Özlem ERKEK, Erdinç ÇAKIROĞLU, Mine IŞIKSAL

A Study On Pre-Service Teachers' Spatial Visualization Ability and Spatial Anxiety

Bu çalışmanın amacı öğretmen adaylarının cinsiyetlerini ve lisans programlarını dikkate alarak uzamsal görselleştirme yetenekleri ve uzamsal kaygı seviyelerini incelemektir. Veriler ilköğretim matematik, fen bilgisi ve okulöncesi öğretmenliği bölümlerinde üçüncü ve dördüncü sınıfta okuyan 1007 öğretmen adayından toplanmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak Uzamsal Görselleştirme Testi ve Uzamsal Kaygı Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Bulgular katılımcıların uzamsal görselleştirme ve uzamsal kaygı puanlarının cinsiyetlerine ve lisans programlarına göre anlamlı düzeyde farklılaştığını göstermiştir.

Öğretmen Adaylarının Uzamsal Görselleştirme Yetenekleri ve Uzamsal Kaygıları Üzerine Bir Çalışma

This study aims to investigate the pre-service teachers' spatial visualization ability and spatial anxiety levels with respect to their gender and undergraduate programs. Data were collected from 1007 third and fourth year undergraduate pre-service teachers enrolled in elementary mathematics, science, and early childhood education programs from four universities in Ankara, Turkey. Spatial Visualization Test and the Spatial Anxiety Scale were used as data collection instruments. The results revealed a statistically significant difference between the spatial visualization ability and spatial anxiety scores of participants in terms of both gender and undergraduate program.

PDF

___

Baenninger, M. & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20(5/6), 327-344.
Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 47-60.
Battista, M. T. (1994). On Greeno's environmental/model view of conceptual domains: A spatial/geometric perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(1), 86-99.
Battista, M. T., Clements, D. H., Arnoff, J., Battista, K. & Borrow, C. V. A. (1998). Students' spatial structuring of 2D arrays of squares. Journal for Research in Mathematics Educa- tion, 29(5), 503-532.
Ben-Chaim, D., Lappan, G. & Houang, R. T. (1988). The effect of instruction on spatial visualization skills of middle school boys and girls. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 51-71.
Bishop, A. J. (1973). Use of structural apparatus and spatial ability: A possible relationship. Research in Education, 9, 43-49.
Boulter, D.R. (1992).The effects of instruction on spatial ability and geometry Performance (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Queen's, Ontario.
Campbell, S. M. & Collaer, M. L. (2009). Stereotype threat and gender differences in performance on a novel visuospatial task. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(4), 437-444.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Coluccia, E., & Louse, G. (2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 329-340.
Etaugh, C. & Liss, M. B. (1992). Home, school, and playroom: Training grounds for adult gender roles. Sex Roles, 26, 129-147.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Journal, 14(1), 51-71.
Francis, K., Khan, S. & Davis, B. (2016). Enactivism, spatial reasoning and coding. Digital
Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1-20.
Guay, R. B. & McDaniel, E. D. (1977). The relationship between mathematics achievement and spatial abilities among elementary school children. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(3), 211-215.
Guzel, N. & Sener, E. (2009). High school students' spatial ability and creativity in geometry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1763-1766.
Halpern, D. F., Beninger, A. S., & Straight, C. A. (2011). Sex differences in intelligence. In R. J.
Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence, (pp. 253-272). Cambridge University Press, USA.
Hawes, Z., Tepylo, D. & Moss, J. (2015). Developing spatial thinking. In B. Davis and the Spatial Reasoning Study Group, Spatial Reasoning in Early Years, Principles, Assertions and Speculations, (pp. 29-44). Routhledge, Taylor and Francis Group, NY and London.
Hegarty, M. & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective- taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32(2), 175-191.
Hund, A. M. & Minarik, J. L. (2006). Getting from here to there: Spatial anxiety, way finding strategies, direction type, and way finding efficiency. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 6, 179-201.
Jakubowski, E. & Unal, H. (2004). Promoting and awakening mathematical creativity. Paper presented at the Florida Council of Teachers of Mathematics Annual Meeting, Miami.
Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35, 211-223.
Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30(11/12), 765-779.
Lawton, C. A. & Kallai, J. (2002). Gender differences in wayfinding strategies and anxiety about wayfinding: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 47, 389-401.
Levine, S.C., Ratliff, K. R.,Huttenlocher, J.,& Cannon, J. (2012). Early puzzle play: A predic- tor of preschoolers' spatial transformation skill. Developmental Psychology, 48, 530-542.
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
Lohman, D. F. (1993, July). Spatial Ability and G. Paper presented at the First Spearman Seminar, Iowa City, Iowa.
Lohman, D. F., & Kyllonen, P. C. (1983). Individual differences in solution strat-egy on spa- tial tasks. In R. F. Dillon & R. R. Schmeck (Eds.), Individual Differences in Cognition, (Vol. 1, pp. 105-135). New York: Academic Press.
Lytton, H. & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents' differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267-296.
Manger, T. & Eikeland, O. (1998). The effects of spatial visualization and students' sex on mathematical achievement. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 17-25.
McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889-918.
Middle Grades Mathematics Project [MGMP] (1983). Spatial Visualization Test. Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University.
Mitchelmore, M. C. (1976). Space and geometry. In J. L. Martin (Ed.), Cross cultural research on concepts of space and geometry (pp. 143-184). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Mohler, J. L. (2008). A review of spatial ability research. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 72(3), 19-30.
Mulligan, J. (2015). Looking within and beyond the geometry curriculum: connecting spatial reasoning to mathematics learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 511-517.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Nemeth, B. (2007). Measurement of the development of spatial ability by mental cutting test. Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae, 34, 123-128.
O'Laughlin, E. M. & Brubaker, B. S. (1998). Use of landmarks in cognitive mapping: Gender differences in self report versus performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(5), 595-601.
Olkun, S. (2003). Making connections: Improving spatial abilities with engineering drawing activities. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning, April, 1-10.
Onyancha, R. M., Derov, M. & Kinsey, B. L. (2009). Improvements in spatial ability as a result of targeted training and computer-aided design software use: Analyses of object geometries and rotation types. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2), 157-167.
Osborne, J. (2001). Testing stereotype threat: Does anxiety explain race and sex differences in achievement? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 291-310.
Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C. & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Spatial anxiety relates to spatial abilities as a function of working memory in children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 474-487.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1994). Gender differences in mental rotation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 435-448.
Robichaux, R. L. R. (2000). The spatial visualization of undergraduates majoring in particu- lar fields of study and the relationship of this ability to individual background characteristics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auburn, Alabama.
Roorda, J. (1994). Visual perception, spatial visualization and engineering drawing. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 58, 12-21.
Schmitz, S. (1997). Gender-related strategies in environmental development: Effects of anxiety on wayfinding in and representation of a three-dimensional maze. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 215-228.
Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604-614.
Sorby, S. A. (1999). Developing 3-D spatial visualization skills. Engineering Design Grap- hics Journal, 63(2), 21-32.
Sorby, S. A., Leopold, C., & Gorska, R. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons of gender differences in the spatial skills of engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5, 279-291.
Sundberg, S. E. (1994). Effect of spatial training on spatial ability and mathematical achievement as compared to traditional geometry instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertati- on). University of Missouri, Kansas City.
Tracy, D. M. (1987). Toys, spatial ability, and science and mathematics achievement: Are they related? Sex Roles, 17, 115-138.
Whiteley, W., Sinclair, N. & Davis, B. (2015). What is spatial reasoning. In B. Davis and the Spatial Reasoning Study Group, Spatial Reasoning in Early Years, Principles, Assertions and speculations, (pp. 3-14). Routhledge, Taylor and Francis Group, NY and London.