SÜREKLİ DEĞERLENDİRMENİN FİZİKOKİMYA ÖĞRETİMİNDE REHBER OLARAK KULLANIMI: BİR DURUM ÇALIŞMASI

Bu çalışmanın amacı, değerlendirme esaslı öğretim yönteminin bir sınıfta nasıl işlediğini ortaya koymak ve bu yöntemin öğrenciler ve sınıf atmosferi üzerine etkisini tespit etmektir. Çalışmanın örneklemini, Atatürk Üniversitesi K.K. Eğitim Fakültesi Kimya Öğretmenliği Anabilim Dalında okuyan toplam 38 üçüncü sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmada 12 hafta boyunca Fizikokimya dersinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yoruma dayalı araştırma metodunun kullanıldığı çalışmada elde edilen verilerin analizinden beş ampirik iddia ileri sürüldü. Değerlendirme esaslı öğretim yönteminin öğrencilerin öğrenmesi ve sınıf atmosferi üzerine olumlu bir etkiye sahip olduğu sonucuna varıldı.

USING CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT AS A GUIDE IN PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY TEACHING: A CASE STUDY

In this case study, it was aimed to explore the effect of assessment embedded in teaching on students’ learning and class atmosphere and to determine how it works in a physical chemistry classroom. The research sample consists of 38 undergraduate chemistry students attending physical chemistry course in Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, Ataturk University. The study was carried out in Physical Chemistry course through 12 weeks. From the analysis of the results, it was suggested five empiric assertions. It was concluded that assessment embedded teaching has positive effects on proving class atmosphere and students’ understanding.

___

  • Bodner, G.M., 1986, Constructivism: A Theory Of Knowledge”, Journal Of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873-878.
  • Regis, A., Albertazzi, P.G. And Roletto, E., 1996, Concept Maps In Chemistry Education, Journal Of Chemical Education, 73(11), 1084-1088.
  • Francisco, J.S. And Nicoll G., 1998, Integrating Multiple Teaching Methods Into A General Chemistry Classroom, Journal Of Chemical Education, 75(2), 210-213.
  • Kılıç, G.B., 2001, Oluşturmacı Fen Öğretimi, Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi,1, 9-21.
  • Linn, R.L. and Gronlund, 1995, N.E., Measurement And Assessment In Teaching, 7th ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, USA
  • Biggs, J., 1998, Assessment And Classroom Learning: A Role For Summative Assessment?, Assessment In Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1),103-111.
  • Heverly, M. And Fitt, D.X., 1994, Classroom Assessment Of Student Competencies, Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 19(3),215- 225.
  • Morrison, K., 1994, Uniformity And Diversity In Assessment: An International Perspective And Agenda, A Journal Of Comparative Education, 24(1), 5-16.
  • Brookhart, S.M., 1997, Effects Of The Classroom Assessment Environment On Mathematics And Science Achievement, Journal of Educational Research, 90(6),323-331.
  • Fowell, S.L., Southgate, L.J. And Bligh, J.G.,1999, Evaluating Assessment: The Missing Link?, Medical Education,33,276-281.
  • Black, P.,2001, Dreams, Strategies And Systems: Portraits Of Assessment Past, Present And Future, Assessment In Education, 8(1),65-85.
  • Struyf, E.,Vandenberghe, R. And Lens, W., 2001, The Evaluation Practice Of Teachers As A Learning Opportunity For Students, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 215- 238.
  • English, L., Bonanno, H., Ihnatko, T., Webb, C. And Jones, J., 1999, Learning Through Writing In A First-Year Accounting Course, Journal Of Accounting Education, 17, 221-254.
  • Columba, L., 2001, Daily classroom assessment, Education, 122(2), 372-375.
  • Treagust, D.F., Jacobowitz, R., Gallager, J.J. And Parker, J., 2001, Using Assessment As A Guide In Teaching For Understanding: A Case Study of Middle School Science Class Learning About Sound, Sci.Edu., 85,137-157.
  • Holliday, W.G.,Yore, L.D. And Alvermann, D.E., 1994,The Reading-Science LearningWriting Connection: Breakthroughs, Barriers And Promises, Journal Of Research In Science Teaching,31,877-894.
  • Rivard, L., P., 1994, A Review Of Writing To Learn In Science: Implications Of Practice And Research, Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 31, 969- 984.
  • Sambell, K., McDowell, L. and Brown, S., 1997,”But is it fair”: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349-371.
  • Feller, M., 1994, Open-Book Testing And Education For Future, Studies In Educational Evaluation,20,235-238.
  • Tillema, H.H. and Smith, K., 2000, Learning From Portfolios: Differential Use Of Feedback In Portfolio Construction, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26,193- 210.
  • Thomson, K. and Falchikov, N., 1998,”Full On Until The Sun Comes Out”: The Effects Of Assessment On Student Approaches To Studying, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 379-391.
  • Gallager, J.J., 2000,Teaching For Understanding And Application Of Science Knowledge, School Science And Mathematics, 100(6), 310-318.
  • Brookhart, S.M., 1997, Effects Of The Classroom Assessment Environment On Mathematics And Science Achievement, Journal of Educational Research, 90(6),323-331.
  • Brookhart, S.M. and DeVoge, J.G., 1999, Testing A Theory About The Role Of Classroom Assessment In Student Motivation And Achievement, Applied Measurement in Education, 12(3), 409-426.
  • Klecker, B.M., 2000, Assessing Students In A Graduate Tests And Measurement Course: Changing The Classroom Climate, College Student Journal, 34(1),155- 161.
  • Sozbilir, M., 2001, A Study of Undergraduates' Understandings of Key Chemical ideas in Thermodynamics (D. Phil. thesis), Department of Educational Studies, University of York, York, UK.
  • Ericson, F., 1986, Qualitative Methods In Research On Teaching, In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook Of Research On Teaching, 119-161.
  • Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner J.W. and Marek E.A., 1992, Understanding And Misunderstanding Of Eight Graders Of Five Chemistry Concepts Found In Textbooks, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2),105-120.
  • Duschl, R.A. And Gitomer, D.H., 1997, Strategies And Challenges To Changing The Focus Of Assessment And Instruction In Science Classroom, Educational Assessment, 4,37-73.
  • Wiggins, G., 1993, Assessment, Authenticity, Context And Validity, Phi Delta Kappan, 75,200- 214.
  • Guskey, T.R., 2001, Use Test Results As Tools To Improve Teaching, Education Digest, 66(5), 25-29.
  • Hinde, R.J. And Kovac, J.,2001, Student Active Learning Methods In Physical Chemistry, Journal Of Chemical Education, 78(1), 93-99.
  • Black, P., 2000, Research And The Development Of Educational Assessment, Oxford Review Of Education, 26(3/4), 407-420.
  • Campbell, C. and Evanz, J.A., 2000, Investigation Of Preservice Teachers’ Classroom Assessment Practices During Student Teaching, The Journal of Educational Research 93(6),350-355.