Ortaokul Matematik Öğretmeni Adaylarının Problem Çözme Sürecindeki Düşünme Yolları, Anlama Yolları ve Pedagojik Yaklaşımları

Bu çalışmada ortaokul matematik öğretmeni adaylarının problem çözme bağlamındaki

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Problem çözme, düşünme yolları, anlama yolları

Pre-Service Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Ways of Thinking, Ways of Understanding and Pedagogical Approaches in Problem-Solving Process

The aim of this study is to investigate pre-service middle school mathematics teachers’ways of thinking (WoT), ways of understanding (WoU) and pedagogical approaches as well asthe relationships among them in the context of problem-solving within the DNR framework. Inthis qualitatively designed study, the data was collected through clinical interviews with fourpre-service middle school mathematics teachers and analyzed through open and axial codingapproach. The results of the analysis indicated that pre-service mathematics teachers’ WoTs inthe context of problem-solving were fell into two categories. This study also revealed that WoTsand particularly proof schemes in the context of problem-solving might play effective role inpre-service middle school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical approaches.

Keywords:

Keywords: Problem solving ways of thinking, ways of understanding, pre-service mathematics teachers.,

PDF

___

Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P. and Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curricula. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 375-402.
English, L. D., Lesh, R. and Fennewald, T. (2008). Future directions and perspectives for problem-solving research and curriculum development. In M. Santillan (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th ICME (pp. 6-13), Monterrey, Mexico.
Fraenkel, J. R. and Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education (3th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Harel, G. (2008). DNR perspective on mathematics curriculum and instruction, Part I: focus on proving. ZDM, 40(3), 487-500.
Harel, G. and Lim, K. H. (2004). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge base: Preliminary results. In M.J. Hoines & A.B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the ICME (Vol. 3(3), pp. 25 - 32). Bergen, Norway.
Harel, G. and Sowder, L. (1998). Students' proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education III (pp. 234-283). Province, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Koichu, B. and Harel, G. (2007). Triadic interaction in clinical task-based interviews with mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 349-365.
Lesh, R. and Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, modeling, and local conceptual development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2-3), 157-189.
Lim, K. H. (2006). Students’ mental acts of anticipating in solving problems involving alge-braic inequalities and equations. Unpublished dissertation, San Diego State University.
Lim, K. H., Morera, O. and Tchoshanov, M. (2009). Assessing problem-solving dispositions: Likelihood-to-act survey. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson and S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Pro-ceedings of the 31th of the PME-NA (pp. 700-708). Atlanta: Georgia State University.
Lim, K. H. and Selden, A. (2009). Mathematical habits of mind. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stin-son and S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31th of the PME-NA (pp. 1576-1583). Atlanta: Georgia State University.
Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton. New Jersey: Princeton University.
Ramnarain, U. (2014). Empowering educationally disadvantaged mathematics students through a strategies-based problem solving approach. The Australian Educational Research-er, 41(1), 43-57.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathemat-ics teaching and learning: A Project of the NCTM (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.
Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and pro-cedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Viholainen, A. (2011). Critical features of formal and informal reasoning in the case of the concept of derivative. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of 35th PME (pp. 305-312). Ankara, Turkey.
Watson, A., and Harel, G. (2013). The role of teachers’ knowledge of functions in their teach-ing: A conceptual approach with illustrations from two cases. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 154-168.