___

• Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C.S. (2000). Occupational identity of management accountatnts in Britain and Germany. European Accounting Review; 9(4), 477-498
• Ahrens, T., & Chapman , C.S. (2002). The structure of legimate performance measures and management: day-to-day contests of accountability in a UK restaurant chain. Management Accounting Research, 13(2), 151-171
• Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C.S. (2004). Accounting for flexibilitiy and efficiency: a field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemproray Accounting Reseach, 21(2), 151-171.
• Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C.S. (2005). Accounting and the crafting of strategy: a practice-based view. In C.S. Chapman (Ed.), Management accounting and strategy (pp. 106-124). Oxford: Oxford University Pres
• Ahrens, T., & Dent, J. F. (1998). Accounting and organizations: realizing the richness of field research. Journal of Management Accounting Researh, 10, 1-39.
• Alac, M., & Hutchins, E. (2004). I see what you are saying: action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(3), 629-662
• Ansari, S. & Euske, K. (1987). Rational, rationalizing, and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations. Accounting, Organization and Society, 12(6), 549-570
• Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: the problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bariff, M. & Galbraith, J.R. (1978). Intraorganizational power considerations for desinging information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3(1), 15-27
• Barnes, B. (2001). Practice as collective action. In T.R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemprary theory (pp. 17-28). London: Routledge
• Berry, A.J., Capps, T., Cooper, D., Ferguson, P., Hopper, T. & Lowe, E.A. (1985). Management control in an area of the NCB: Rationales of accounting practices in a public enterprise. Accounting, Organization and Society, 10(1), 3-28
• Biernacki, R. (1999). Method and metaphor after new cultural history. In V.E. Bonnell & L.Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn: New directions in the study of society and culture (pp. 62-92). Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
• Bloch, M. (1991). Language, anthropology and cognitive science. Man, 183-198
• Bloomfield, B.P., Coombs, R., Cooper, D.J. & Rea, D. (1992). Machines and manoeuvre: responsibility accounting and the construction of hospital information systems. Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 2, 197-219
• Boland, R., & Pondy, L.(1983). Accounting in organizations: a union of natural and rational perspectives. Accounting, Organization and Society, 8(2/3), 223-245.
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. (R.Nice, Trans.), Vol.16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bower, J.(1970). Managing the resource allocation process. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Scholl Press.
• Briers, M., & Chua, W.F. (2001). The role of actor Networks and boundary objects in management accounting change. A field study of an implementation of activity-based costing. Accountning, Organizations and Society, 26(3), 237-269
• Brunsson, N. (1990). Deciding for responsibility and legitimization: alternative interpretations of organizational. Accounting, Organization and Society, 15(1/2), 47-60
• Burchell, S., Clubb, C. & Hopwood, A.G. (1985). Accounting in its social context: towards a history of value-added in the United Kingdom. Accounting, Organization and Society, 10(4), 381-413
• Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A.G., Hughes, J. & Nahapiet, N. (1980). The roles of accounting in organization and society. Accounting, Organization and Society, 5(1), 5- 27
• Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of stratejic choice. Sociology, 6, 1-22
• Chua, W.F. (1995). Experts, Networks and inscriptions in the fabrication of accounting images: a story of the representation of three public hospitals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 111-145
• Cohen, M., March, J.G., & Olson, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1-25
• Cooper, D. (1980). Discussion of towards a political economy of accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society, 5(1), 161-166.
• Dechow, N., & Mouritsen, J. (2005). On enterprise resource planning systems: the quest for integration and management control. Accounting, Organization and Society, 30(7-8), 691-733
• Den Hertog, J.F. (1978). The role of information and control systems in the process of organizational renewal: roadblock or road bridge?, Accounting, Organization and Society,3(1), 29-45
• Dent, J.F. (1986). Organizational research in accounting: perspectives, issues and a commentary. In M. Bromwich & A. G. Hopwood (Eds.), Research and current issues in management accounting. London: Pitman.
• Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1988). Mind over machine: the power of human intution and expertise in the era of computer (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
• Ezzamel, M., & Bourn, M. (1990). The roles of accounting information systems in a organization experincing financial crisis. Accounting, Organization and Society,15(5), 399-424.
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Proffesional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633
• Hedberg, B., & Jönsson, S. (1978). Desining semi-confusing information systems for organizations in changing environments. Accounting, Organization and Society, 3(1), 47-64.
• Hedberg, B., Nystrom, C. & Starbuck, W. (1976). Camping on seesaws: prescriptions for self-designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 41-66.
• Hopwood, A. G. (1987). The archaelology of accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 207-234.
• Hopwood, A. G. (1989). Organisational contingencies and accounting configurations. In B. Fridman, L. Ostman(Eds.), Accounting development-some perspectives-in honour of Sven-Eric Johansson (pp. 23-44) Stockholm.
• Hopwood, A. G., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1994). Accounting as social and institutional practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
• Hoskin, K. _., & Macve, R. H. (1986). Accounting and the examination: a genealogy of disciplianry power. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(2), 105-136.
• Hoskin, K. _., & Macve, R. H. (1988). The genesis of accountability: the west point connections. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(1), 37-73.
• Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19(3), 265-288.
• Kaplan, R. S. (1994). Management accounting (1984-1994): development of new practice and theory. Management Accounting Research, 5(3-4), 247-260.
• Kaplan, R. S. (1998). Innovation action research: creating new management theory and practice. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10(Fall), 89-118.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, S. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Latour, B. (1996a). Aramis or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Latour, B. (1996b). On actor-network theory: a few clarifications. Soziale Welt 47(4), 369-381.
• Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 15-25). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Law, J. (1991). Introduction: monsters, machines and socio-technical relations. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essasys on power, technology and domination (pp. 1-25). London: Routledge.
• Law, J., & Hassard, J. (Eds). (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
• March, J. G. (1987). Ambiguity and accounting: the elusive link between information and decision making. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 153-168.
• Markus, M., &Pfeffer, J. (1983). Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2/3), 205- 218.
• Miller, P. (2001). Governing by numbers: Why calculative practices matter. Social Research, 68(2), 379-396.
• Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of teh governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 235-265.
• Miller, P. & O’Leary, T. (1990). Making accounting practical. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(5), 479-498.
• Miller, P. & O’Leary, T. (1994). Accounting, “economic citizenship” and the spatial reordering of manufacture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(1), 15-43.
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19(1), 1- 31.
• Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., &Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of unstructured decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246-275.
• Mouritsen, J. (1999). The flexible firm: strategies for a subcontractor’s management control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(1), 31-55.
• Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: an ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
• Ortner, S. B. (1984). Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126-166.
• Pinch, T., Mulkay, M., & Ashmore, M. (1989). Clinical budgeting: experimentation in the social sciences: a drama in five acts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14(3), 271-301.
• Preston, A., Cooper, D., & Coombs, R. W. (1992). Fabricating budgets: a study of the production of management budgeting in the National Health Service. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 561-593.
• Quattrone, P., & Hopper, T. (2005). A “time-space odyssey”: management control systems in two multinational organisations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(7-8), 735-764.
• Radcliffe, V. S. (1998). Efficiency audit: an assembly of rationalities and programmes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(4), 377-410.
• Robson, K. (1992). Accounting numbers as “Inscription”: Action at a distance and the development of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(7), 685-708.
• Roseberry, W. (1982). Balinese cookfights and the seduction of anthropology. Social Research, 49(4), 1013-1028.
• Schatzki, T. R. (2001a). Practice mind-ed orders. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 42-55). London and New York: Routledge.
• Schatzki, T. R. (2001b). Practice theory: an introduction. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.
• Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: a philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
• Schatzki, T. R. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies. 26(3), 465- 484.
• Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• Star, S. L., & Greisemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundar objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907- 1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
• Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273-286.
• Swieringa, R., & Weick, K. (1987). Management accounting and action. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 293-308.
• Vera-Munoz, S. (1998). The effects of accounting knowledge and context on the omission of opportunity costs in resorurce allocation decisions. The Accounting Review, 73(1), 47-72.
• Vera-Munoz, S., Kinney, W., Jr., &Bonner, S. E. (2001). The effects of domain experience and task presentation formation on accountant’s information relevance assurance. The Accounting Review, 76(3), 405-429.
• Whittington, R. (2006). Conpleting the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613-634.
• Wildavsky, A. (1978). Policy analysis is what information systems are not. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3(1), 77-88.
• Young, J.J. (1996). Institutional thinking: the case of financial instruments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(5), 487-512.