Burcu ONUK, Ahmet ÇOLAK, Serhat ARSLAN, Sedef Selviler SİZER, Murat KABAK

The Effects of Clay Modeling and Plastic Model Dressing Techniques on Veterinary Anatomy Training

In addition to classical anatomy applications, particularly in medicine education, the contribution of different methods (3D modeling, body painting and clay modeling) has been investigated for the purpose of anatomy training. In recent years, clay modeling which is the one of these methods is frequently used. The aim of the present study was to determine the contribution of clay modeling and plastic model dressing methods to veterinary anatomy training. The ruminant forelimb’s bones, joints, muscles and nerves were chosen as the topic of this study. Clay material was used for bone models, coloured play dough were used for joints, and Colored Eva Sponges were used for muscles and nerves. Students were divided into two groups as new method group and classical method group. The students were given exams and the results of exams were evaluated at the end of each application. It was detected that the student success rate increased when clay modelling and plastic model dressing methods were employed (P0.05). With this study, the clay modeling and plastic model dressing methods applied for the first time in veterinary anatomy training was found to increase student achievement and motivation significantly. Furthermore, we believe that organ models prepared by this method will contribute to education.

Kil Modelleme ve Plastik Model Giydirme Tekniğinin Veteriner Anatomi Eğitimine Etkisi

Anatomi eğitiminde, özellikle tıp fakültelerinde klasik anatomi uygulamaların yanında farklı yöntemlerinde (3D modelleme, vücut boyama, vb) eğitime katkısı araştırılmaktadır. Son yıllarda bu yöntemlerden kil modelleme yöntemi sık kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışma ile kil modelleme ve plastik giydirme yöntemlerinin veteriner anatomi eğitimine katkısının belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Konu olarak ruminant ön bacak kemikleri, eklemleri, kasları ve sinirleri seçildi. Kemik modellemeleri için kil materyal, eklem için renkli oyun hamurları, kas ve sinir için ise renkli eva süngerleri kullanıldı. Öğrenciler yeni yöntem grubu ve klasik yöntem grubu olarak ikiye ayrıldı. Her uygulama sonu sınav yapıldı ve sonuçları değerlendirildi. Başarının, kil ve plastik model giydirme yöntemi ile arttığı saptandı (P0.05). Veteriner anatomi eğitiminde ilk kez uygulanan ve eğitime katkısının araştırıldığı bu çalışmanın öğrenci başarısını ve motivasyonunu oldukça arttırdığı saptandı. Ayrıca bu yöntem ile hazırlanacak olan organ modellerinin de eğitime katkısının olacağını düşünmekteyiz.

PDF

___

1. Nakiboğlu M: Kuramdan uygulamaya beyin fırtınası yöntemi. TEBD, 1 (3): 341-350, 2003.

2. Kinnison T, Forrest DN, Frean SP, Baillie S: Teaching bovine abdominal anatomy: Use of a haptic simulator. Anat Sci Educ, 2, 280-285, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/ase.109

3. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A: The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ, 3, 83-93, 2010. DOI: 10.1002/ ase.139

4. Bareither ML, Arbel V, Growe M, Muszczynski E, Rudd A, Marone JR: Clay modeling versus written modules as effective interventions in understanding human anatomy. Anat Sci Educ, 6, 170-176, 2013. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1321

5. Preece D, Wiliams SB, Lam R, Weller R: “Let’s get physical”: Advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ, 6, 216-224, 2013. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1345

6. Raffan H, Guevar J, Poyade M, Rea PM: Canine neuroanatomy: Development of a 3D reconstruction and interactive application for undergraduate veterinary education. Plos One, 12 (2): e0168911, 2017. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168911

7.Cankur NŞ: Anatomiye giriş ve temel kavramlar. http://anatomi.uludag. edu.tr/anatomiye%20giris%20ve%20temel%20kavramlar.doc; Accessed: 10 February 2018.

8. Demir BD: Anatomiye Giriş. http://www.slideshare.net/ByOzi1903/tds1-anatomiye-giriş; Accessed: 02 April 2018.

9. Turan Özdemir S: Tıp eğitimi ve yetişkin öğrenmesi. Uludağ Univ Tıp Fak Derg, 29 (2): 25-28, 2003.

10. Rizzola LJ, Stewart WB: Should we continue teaching anatomy by dissection when? Anat Rec B New Anat, 289B, 215-218, 2006. DOI: 10.1002/ ar.b.20117

11. Türk Kaya S, Arıcan İ: Veteriner anatomi’de bilgisayar destekli illüstrasyon uygulamaları. Uludag Univ J Fac Vet Med, 33 (1-2): 49-55, 2014. DOI: 10.30782/uluvfd.384775

12. Böttcher P, Maıerl J, Schiemann T, Glaser C, Weller R, Hoehne KH, Reiser M, Liebich HG: The visible animal project: A three-dimensional, digital database for high quality three-dimensional reconstructions. Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 40 (6): 611-616, 1999. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.1999. tb00887.x

13. Thomas DB, Hiscox JD, Dixon BJ, Potgieter J: 3D scanning and printing skeletal tissues for anatomy education. J Anat, 229, 473-481, 2016. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12484

14. Lombardi SA, Hicks RE, Thompson KV, Marbach-Ad G: Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions. Adv Physiol Educ, 38, 80-86, 2014. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00154.2012

15. Peker T, Gülekon İN, Özkan S, Anıl A, Turgut HS: Karmaşık anatomik yapıların üç boyutlu anaglif stereo yöntemi kullanılarak öğrencilere anlatılması ve bunun geleneksel iki boyutlu ders anlatımı ile karşılaştırılması. Acta Odontol Turc, 31 (2): 80-85, 2014. DOI: 10.17214/ aot.06914

16. Crowther E, Baillie S: A method of developing and ıntroducing casebased learning to a preclinical veterinary curriculum. Anat Sci Educ, 9, 8089, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1530

17. Küçük S, Kapakin S, Göktaş Y: Medical faculty students views on anatomy learning via mobile augmented reality technology. J High Educ Sci, 5 (3): 316-323, 2015. DOI: 10.5961/jhes.2015.133

18. Azer SA, Azer S: 3D anatomy models and impact on learning: A review of the quality of literature. Health Prof Educ, 2, 80-98, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpe.2016.05.002

19. Estai M, Bunt S: Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat, 208, 151-157, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat. 2016.02.010

20. Motoike HK, O’Kane RL, Lenchner E, Haspel C: Clay modeling as a method to learn human muscles: A community college study. Anat Sci Educ, 2, 19-23, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/ase.61

21. Oh CS, Kim JY, Choe YH: Learning of cross-sectional anatomy using clay models. Anat Sci Educ, 2, 156-159, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/ase.92

22. Christensen R: Analysis of variance, design, and regression: Linear modeling for unbalanced data. 2nd ed., 638, Chapman&Hall/CRC, New York, 2015.

23. Naug HL, Colson NJ, Donner DG: Promoting metacognition in first year anatomy laboratories using plasticine modeling and drawing activities: A pilot study of the ‘‘blank page’’ technique. Anat Sci Educ, 4, 231-234, 2011. DOI: 10.1002/ase.228

24. Waters JR, Meter PV, Perrotti W, Drogo S, Cyr RJ: Cat dissection vs. sculpting human structures in clay: An analysis of two approaches to undergraduate human anatomy laboratory education. Adv Physiol Educ, 29, 27-34, 2005. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00033.2004

25. DeHoff ME, Clark KL, Meganathan K: Learning outcomes and student-perceived value of clay modeling and cat dissection in undergraduate human anatomy and physiology. Adv Physiol Educ, 35, 68-75, 2011. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00094.2010

26. Finn GM, McLachlan JC: A qualitative study of student responses to body painting. Anat Sci Educ, 3, 33-38, 2010. DOI: 10.1002/ase.119

27. Küçük S, Kapakin S, Göktaş Y: Learning anatomy via mobila augmented reality: Effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anat Sci Educ, 9, 411-421, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1603

28. Çevik Demirkan A, Akalan MA, Özdemir V, Akosman MS, Türkmenoğlu İ: Gerçek iskelet modellerinin anatomi teorik ve pratik derslerinde kullanımının veteriner fakültesi öğrencilerin öğrenimi üzerine etkilerinin araştırılması. Kocatepe Vet J, 9 (4): 266-272, 2016.