Nikolina RUSENOVA, Svetozar KRUSTEV, Anatoli ATANASOV, Anton RUSENOV, Spaska STANILOVA

Staphylococcus intermedius Grubundaki (SIG) Staphylococcus pseudintermedius’un Geleneksel ve Moleküler Yöntemlerle Ayırdedilmesi

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, benzer fenotipik özelliklere sahip temsilciler içeren Staphylococcus intermedius grubunun (SIG) bir üyesidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, köpek ve kedilerden elde edilen klinik örneklerde SIG grubu ataması için temel biyokimyasal testleri takiben PCR-RFLP analizine dayanarak S. pseudintermedius’un doğru şekilde ayırdedilmesi için bir yöntemi optimize etmek ve SIG grubunun diğer üyelerine kıyasla S. pseudintermedius’un yaygınlığını belirlemekti. Bu amaçla, köpeklerden elde edilen 158 ve kedilerden elde edilen 17 izolat, 4 referans suş - S. intermedius ATCC 29663, S. pseudintermedius LMG 22219, Staphylococcus delphini ATCC 49171, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25922 ve S. aureus’un 5 saha suşu analiz edildi. Oluşturulan PCR-RFLP profili (pta geni, MboI kısıtlama enzimi), S. pseudintermedius’u sahip olduğu 213 ve 107 bp’lik iki farklı bantla SIG grubu içinde belirgin şekilde ayırdetti. Veriler, köpeklerden alınan klinik örneklerde S. pseudintermedius’un baskın olduğunu gösterirken, kedi örneklerinde S. pseudintermedius belirlenmedi. Sonuç olarak, bazı S. pseudintermedius izolatlarında bulunan atipik biyokimyasal reaksiyonlar (%14.6) nedeniyle kesin tanı, kapsamlı bir fenotipik test ile birlikte kullanılacak moleküler biyolojik bir yöntem veya sadece moleküler yönteme dayanmalıdır.

Differentiation of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in the Staphylococcus intermedius Group (SIG) by Conventional and Molecular Methods

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is a member of the Staphylococcus intermedius group (SIG) comprising representatives with similarphenotypic characteristics. The purpose of this study was to optimise a method for accurate differentiation of S. pseudintermedius in clinicalsamples from dogs and cats based on PCR-RFLP analysis, following the key biochemical tests for SIG group assignment, and to determinethe prevalence of S. pseudintermedius compared to other members of the SIG group. To implement this, 158 isolates from dogs and 17 fromcats, 4 reference strains - S. intermedius ATCC 29663, S. pseudintermedius LMG 22219, Staphylococcus delphini ATCC 49171, Staphylococcusaureus ATCC 25922 and 5 field strains of S. aureus were analysed. The generated PCR-RFLP profile (pta gene, MboI restriction enzyme) clearlydifferentiated S. pseudintermedius within the SIG group by having two distinctive bands of 213 and 107 bp, respectively. The data showeda predominance of S. pseudintermedius in clinical samples from dogs, while no S. pseudintermedius were found among the cat’s samples. Inconclusion, due to the atypical biochemical reactions found in some S. pseudintermedius isolates (14.6%), precise identification should bebased on an extensive phenotypic assay together with a molecular biological method or the latter alone.

PDF

___

1. Velázquez-Guadarrama N, Olivares-Cervantes AL, Salinas E, Martinez L, Escorcia M, Oropeza R, Rosas I: Presence of environmental coagulase-positive staphylococci, their clonal relationship, resistance factors and ability to form biofilm. Rev Argent Microbiol, 49, 15-23, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ram.2016.08.006
2. Devriese LA, Vancanneyt M, Baele M, Vaneechoutt, M, De Graef E, Snauwaert C, Cleenwerck I, Dawyndt P, Swings J, Decostere A, Haesebrouck F: Staphylococcus pseudintermedius sp. nov., a coagulasepositive species from animals. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 55, 1569-1573, 2005. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.63413-0
3. Sasaki T, Tsubakishita S, Tanaka Y, Sakusabe A, Ohtsuka M, Hirotaki S, Kawakami T, Fukata T, Hiramatsu K: Multiplex-PCR method for species identification of coagulase-positive staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol, 48, 765-769, 2010. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01232-09
4. Szczuka E, Jabłonska L, Kaznowski A: Coagulase-negative staphylococci: Pathogenesis, occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes and in vitro effects of antimicrobial agents on biofilm-growing bacteria. J Med Microbiol, 65, 1405-1413, 2016. DOI: 10.1099/JMM.0.000372
5. Vandenesch F, Célard M, Arpin D, Bes M, Greenland T, Etienne J: Catheter-related bacteremia associated with coagulase-positive Staphylococcus intermedius. J Clin Microbiol, 33, 2508-2510, 1995.
6. Wang N, Neilan AM, Klompas M: Staphylococcus intermedius infections: Case report and literature review. Infect Dis Rep, 22, 5:e3, 2013. DOI: 10.4081/IDR.2013.E3
7. Bannoehr J, Ben Zakour NL, Waller AS, Guardabassi L, Thoday KL, van den Broek AHM, Fitzgerald JR: Population genetic structure of the Staphylococcus intermedius group: Insights into agr diversification and the emergence of methicillin-resistant strains. J Bacteriol, 189, 8685-8692, 2007. DOI: 10.1128/JB.01150-07
8. Sasaki T, Kikuchi K, Tanaka Y, Takahashi N, Kamata S, Hiramatsu K: Reclassification of phenotypically identified Staphylococcus intermedius strains. J Clin Microbiol, 45, 2770-2778, 2007. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00360-07
9. Fitzgerald JR: The Staphylococcus intermedius group of bacterial pathogens: Species re-classification, pathogenesis and the emergence of methicillin resistance. Vet Dermatol, 20, 490-495, 2009. DOI: 10.1111/ J.1365-3164.2009.00828.x
10. Devriese LA, Hermans K, Baele M, Haesebrouck F: Staphylococcus pseudintermedius versus Staphylococcus intermedius. Vet Microbiol, 133, 206-207, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.06.002
11. Kizerwetter-Świda M, Chrobak-Chmiel D, Rzewuska M, Antosiewicz A, Dolka B, Ledwoń A, Czujkowska A, Binek M: Genetic characterization of coagulase-positive staphylococci isolated from healthy pigeons. Pol J Vet Sci, 18, 627-634, 2015. DOI: 10.1515/pjvs-2015-0081
12. Becker K, Harmsen D, Mellmann A, Meier C, Schumann P, Peters G, von Eiff C: Development and evaluation of a quality-controlled ribosomal sequence database for 16S ribosomal DNA-based identification of Staphylococcus species. J Clin Microbiol, 42, 4988-4995, 2004. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.4988-4995.2004
13. Bannoehr, J, Franco A, Iurescia M, Battisti A, Fitzgerald JR: Molecular diagnostic identification of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. J Clin Microbiol, 47, 469-471, 2009. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01915-08
14. Nisa S, Bercker C, Midwinter AC, Bruce I, Graham CF, Venter P, Bell A, French NP, Benschop J, Bailey KM, Wilkinson DA: Combining MALDI-TOF and genomics in the study of methicillin resistant and multidrug resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in New Zealand. Sci Rep, 9:1271, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37503-9
15. Markey B, Leonar, F, Archambault M, Cullinane A, Maguire D: Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. 2nd ed., 105, Mosby, Elsevier Ltd, 2013.
16. Chrobak D, Kizerwetter-Swida M, Rzewuska M, Moodley A, Guardabassi L, Binek M: Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains isolated from clinical samples of animal origin. Folia Microbiolol, 56, 415-422, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s12223-011- 0064-7
17. Geraghty L, Booth M, Rowan N, Fogarty A: Investigations on the efficacy of routinely used phenotypic methods compared to genotypic approaches for the identification of staphylococcal species isolated from companion animals in Irish veterinary hospitals. Ir Vet J, 66:7, 2013. DOI: 10.1186/2046-0481-66-7
18. Sareyyüpoğlu B, Müştak HK, Cantekin Z, Diker KS: Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from shelter dogs in Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 20, 435-438, 2014. DOI: 10.9775/ kvfd.2013.10364
19. Rusenova NV, Rusenov AG: Detection of Staphylococcus aureus among coagulase positive staphylococci from animal origin based on conventional and molecular methods. Mac Vet Rev, 40, 29-36, 2017. DOI: 10.1515/macvetrev-2016-0095
20. Bierowiec K, Miszczak M, Biskupska M, Korzeniowska-Kowal A, Tobiasz.A, Rypula K, Gamian A: Prevalence of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in cats population in Poland. Int J Infect Dis, 79, 70-71, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.11.180