___

• Akpınar, M. E. (2022). Machine Selection application in a hard chrome plating industry using fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy ARAS methods. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 29(1), 107-119. doi: https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.848811
• Alvand, A., Mirhosseini, S. M., Ehsanifar, M., Zeighami, E. & Mohammadi, A. (2021). Identification and assessment of risk in construction projects using the integrated FMEA-SWARA-WASPAS model under fuzzy environment: a case study of a construction project in Iran. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1877875
• Ansari, Z. N., Kant, R. & Shankar, R. (2020). Evaluation and ranking of solutions to mitigate sustainable remanufacturing supply chain risks: A hybrid fuzzy SWARA-fuzzy COPRAS framework approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 13(6), 473-494. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1758973
• Ar, İ. M., Baki, B. ve Özdemir, F. (2014). Kuruluş yeri seçiminde bulanık AHS-VIKOR yaklaşımının kullanımı: Otel sektöründe bir uygulama. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (13), 93-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.18092/ijeas.07453
• Aro, J. L., Selerio Jr, E., Evangelista, S. S., Maturan, F., Atibing, N. M., & Ocampo, L. (2022). Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-CODAS-SORT for characterizing the challenges of circular public sector supply chains. Operations Research Perspectives, 9, 100246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2022.100246
• Arslan, H. M., Durak, İ. ve Özdemir, Y. (2021). Entropi-Aras hibrit yöntemi ile bilişim işletmeleri için en uygun teknopark bölgesinin belirlenmesi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 17(3), 734-753. doi: https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.839584
• Asori, M., Dogbey, E., Morgan, A. K., Ampofo, S. T., Mpobi, R. K. J., & Katey, D. (2022). Application of GIS-based multi-criteria decision making analysis (GIS-MCDA) in selecting locations most suitable for siting engineered landfills–the case of Ashanti Region, Ghana. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33 (3), 800-826. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2021-0159
• Aydınoğlu, A. Ç., Şişman, S. ve Ergül, İ. (2022). Sezgisel ağ tabanlı konum tahsis analiz algoritmaları ile tesis yeri optimizasyonu: İtfaiye tesisleri yer seçimi örneği. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 6(1), 955-976.
• Aytekin, A. (2018). Using hybrid method in selecting timber factory location. Drvna Industrija, 69(3), 273-281. doi: https://doi.org/10.5552/drind.2018.1736
• Cedolin, M., Göker, N., Dogu, E., & Esra Albayrak, Y. (2017). Facility location selection employing fuzzy DEA and fuzzy goal programming techniques. In Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017 (pp. 466-476). Springer, Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66830-7_42
• Chang, N. B., Parvathinathan, G., & Breeden, J. B. (2008). Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. Journal of Environmental Management, 87(1), 139-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.011
• Chakraborty, S., Kumar, R. & Athawale, V. M. (2010). Facility location selection using the UTA method. The IUP Journal of Operations Management, 9(4), 21-34. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1744706
• Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy sets and systems, 114(1), 1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1
• Chithambaranathan, P., Rajkumar, A., Prithiviraj, D., & Palpandi, M. (2022). A multi criteria decision based approach for facility location selection with flexible criteria weights. Materials Today: Proceedings. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.467
• Chou, T. Y., Hsu, C. L., & Chen, M. C. (2008). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for international tourist hotels location selection. International journal of hospitality management, 27(2), 293-301. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.07.029
• Dağ, S. ve Önder, E. (2013). Decision-making for facility location using VIKOR method. Journal of International Scientific Publication: Economy & Business, 7(1), 308-330. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2382495
• Deveci, M., Simic, V., & Torkayesh, A. E. (2021). Remanufacturing facility location for automotive Lithium-ion batteries: An integrated neutrosophic decision-making model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317, 128438. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128438
• Dey, B., Bairagi, B., Sarkar, B., & Sanyal, S. K. (2016). Warehouse location selection by fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodologies based on subjective and objective criteria. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 11(4), 262-278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2015.1086964
• Durak, İ., Arslan, H. M. ve Özdemir, Y. (2022). Application of AHP–TOPSIS methods in technopark selection of technology companies: Turkish case. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(10), 1109-1123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1925242
• Effatpanah, S. K., Ahmadi, M. H., Aungkulanon, P., Maleki, A., Sadeghzadeh, M., Sharifpur, M., & Chen, L. (2022). Comparative analysis of five widely-used multi-criteria decision-making methods to evaluate clean energy technologies: a case study. Sustainability, 14(3), 1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031403
• Ertuğrul, İ., & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2008). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(7), 783-795. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8
• Feng, J., Xu, S. X., Xu, G., & Cheng, H. (2022). An integrated decision-making method for locating parking centers of recyclable waste transportation vehicles. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 157, 102569. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102569
• Gao, Z., Yoshimoto, K., & Ohmori, S. (2010). Application of AHP/DEA to facility layout selection. In 2010 Third International Joint Conference on Computational Science and Optimization, China (Vol. 2, pp. 252-254). IEEE.
• Ghasemian Sahebi, I., Arab, A., & Toufighi, S. P. (2020). Analyzing the barriers of organizational transformation by using fuzzy SWARA. Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications, 1(2), 84-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2020.249191.1010
• Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 50(3), 25-44. Retrieved from https://eds.p.ebscohost.com/eds/ pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=f2b23750-01d9-4c63-a3d0-f2178fa19221%40redis
• Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Hooshmand, R., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2017). Fuzzy extension of the CODAS method for multi-criteria market segment evaluation. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(1), 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1278559 Gorcun, O. F., Senthil, S., & Küçükönder, H. (2021). Evaluation of tanker vehicle selection using a novel hybrid fuzzy MCDM technique. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 140-162. doi: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame210402140g
• Görçün, Ö. F., Zolfani, S. H., & Çanakçıoğlu, M. (2022). Analysis of efficiency and performance of global retail supply chains using integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy EATWOS methods. Operations Management Research, 1-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00261-z
• Güneş, M. (2019). KOBİ’ler için girişimcilik. İstanbul: Türkmen Kitabevi.
• Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Tikniouine, A., & Agouti, T. (2016). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2131-7
• Maghsoodi, A.I, Maghsoodi, A.I, Poursoltan, P., Antucheviciene, J., & Turskis, Z. (2019). Dam construction material selection by implementing the integrated SWARA—CODAS approach with target-based attributes. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 19(4), 1194-1210. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016 /j.acme.2019.06.010
• Kabadayı, N. ve Esen, T. E. Ç. (2021). Gri İlişkisel temelli TOPSIS yöntemi ile depo yeri seçimi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 169-184. doi: https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.761624
• Karagoz, S., Deveci, M., Simic, V., Aydin, N., & Bolukbas, U. (2020). A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul. Waste Management & Research, 38(6), 660-672. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X19899729
• Karagöz, S., Deveci, M., Simic, V., & Aydin, N. (2021). Interval type-2 Fuzzy ARAS method for recycling facility location problems. Applied Soft Computing, 102, 107107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107107
• Karaşan, A., Kaya, İ., & Erdoğan, M. (2020). Location selection of electric vehicles charging stations by using a fuzzy MCDM method: a case study in Turkey. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(9), 4553-4574. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3752-2
• Kannan, D., Moazzeni, S., Mostafayi Darmian, S., & Afrasiabi, A. (2021). A hybrid approach based on MCDM methods and Monte Carlo simulation for sustainale evaluation of potential solar sites in east of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 122368. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122368
• Karande, P., & Chatterjee, P. (2018). Desirability function approach for selection of facility location: A case study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Paris, France (pp. 1700-1708).
• Kaul, A., Darbari, J. D., & Jha, P. C. (2020). A fuzzy MCDM model for facility location evaluation based on quality of life. In Soft Computing for Problem Solving (pp. 687-697). Springer, Singapore. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0035-0_56
• Katrancı, A. ve Kundakcı, N. (2020). Bulanık CODAS yöntemi ile kripto para yatırım alternatiflerinin değerlendirilmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(4), doi: 958-973. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.599757
• Keleş, M. K., Özdağoğlu, A. ve Işıldak, B. (2021). Yolcular Açısından Havalimanlarının Değerlendirilmesine Yönelik Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Bir Uygulama. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 419-456. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub /ahbvuibfd/issue/64683/795201
• Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243-258. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12
• Kieu, P. T., Nguyen, V. T., Nguyen, V. T., & Ho, T. P. (2021). A spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (SF-AHP) and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) algorithm in distribution center location selection: A case study in agricultural supply chain. Axioms, 10(2), 53. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10020053
• Krajewski, L. J., Ritzman, L. P., & Malhotra, M. K. (2010). Operations management: Processes and supply chains. 9th Edition, New Jersey: Pearson. Çeviri Editörü: Semra Birgün, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara
• Kumar, K., & Kumanan, S. (2011). An Integrated Fuzzy QFD and AHP Approach for Facility Location Selection. IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(4), 30-41. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2138805
• Kuo, M. S., & Liang, G. S. (2011). A novel hybrid decision-making model for selecting locations in a fuzzy environment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54(1-2), 88-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.01.038
• Liu, Z., Huang, R., & Shao, S. (2022). Data-driven two-stage fuzzy random mixed integer optimization model for facility location problems under uncertain environment. AIMS Mathematics, 7(7), 13292-13312. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022734
• Mavi, R. K., Goh, M., & Zarbakhshnia, N. (2017). Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91(5), 2401-2418. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9880-x
• Miç, P., & Antmen, Z. F. (2021). A Decision-making model based on TOPSIS, WASPAS, and MULTIMOORA methods for university location selection Problem. SAGE Open, 11(3), 21582440211040115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040115
• Moniri, M. R., Tabriz, A. A., Ayough, A., & Zandieh, M. (2021). Turnaround project risk assessment using hybrid fuzzy SWARA and EDAS method: case of upstream oil process industries in Iran. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(4), 966-988, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-07-2020-0287
• Mucuk, İ. (2018). Modern işletmecilik (21. Baskı). İstanbul: Türkmen Kitabevi.
• Nacar, E. N. ve Erdebilli, B. (2021). Tesis yeri seçimine yeni bir bakış: katmanlı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemi. Verimlilik Dergisi, (4), 103-117. doi: https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.832480
• Nong, T. N. M. (2022). A hybrid model for distribution center location selection. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 38(1), 40-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.10.003 Özbek, A. (2019). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ve Excel ile Problem Çözümü. 2. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. ISBN:9789750245138
• Panchal, D., Chatterjee, P., Shukla, R. K., Choudhury, T. & Tamosaitiene, J. (2017). Integrated fuzzy AHP-CODAS framework for maintenance decision in urea fertilizer industry. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 3(51), 179-196. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cys/ecocyb /v50y2017i3p179-196.html
• Pourrezaie-Khaligh, P., Bozorgi-Amiri, A., Yousefi-Babadi, A., & Moon, I. (2022).: A case study. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 102, 243-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.09.022
• Rahman, M. S., Ali, M. I., Hossain, U., & Mondal, T. K. (2018). Facility location selection for plastic manufacturing industry in Bangladesh by using AHP method. International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering, 7(3), 307-319. doi:https://doi.org/10.22105/riej.2018.135742.1049
• Seker, S., & Aydin, N. (2020). Hydrogen production facility location selection for Black Sea using entropy based TOPSIS under IVPF environment. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(32), 15855-15868. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.183
• Sennaroglu, B., & Celebi, G. V. (2018). A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 160-173.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.022
• Simic, V., Karagoz, S., Deveci, M., & Aydin, N. (2021). Picture fuzzy extension of the CODAS method for multi-criteria vehicle shredding facility location. Expert Systems with Applications, 175, 114644. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114644
• Singh, S., Upadhyay, S. P., & Powar, S. (2022). Developing an integrated social, economic, environmental, and technical analysis model for sustainable development using hybrid multi-criteria decision making methods. Applied Energy, 308, 118235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118235
• Soyşekerci, S. ve Erturgut, R. (2011). Genel işletme. İstanbul: Kriter Yayınları.
• Steyn, J. & Buys, C. (2017). Project optimisation techniques: Site selection for process plants, Owner Team Consulatation, Retrieved from https://www.ownerteamconsult.com/site-selection-for-process-plants/ Suman, M. N. H., MD Sarfaraj, N., Chyon, F. A., & Fahim, M. R. I. (2021). Facility location selection for the furniture industry of Bangladesh: Comparative AHP and FAHP analysis. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13, 18479790211030851. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211030851
• Terme, B., Çiçek, İ., & Kiraz, A. Entegre Bulanık AHP ve Bulanık VIKOR Yöntemleriyle Tesis Yeri Seçimi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 383-398. doi: https://doi.org/10.21605/ cukurovaumfd.1146098
• Torkayesh, A. E., & Simic, V. (2022). Stratified hybrid decision model with constrained attributes: Recycling facility location for urban healthcare plastic waste. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77, 103543. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103543
• Tripathi, A. K., Agrawal, S., & Gupta, R. D. (2021). Comparison of GIS-based AHP and fuzzy AHP methods for hospital site selection: a case study for Prayagraj City, India. GeoJournal, 1-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10445-y
• Tuzkaya, G., Önüt, S., Tuzkaya, U. R., & Gülsün, B. (2008). An analytic network process approach for locating undesirable facilities: An example from Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 970-983. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.05.004
• Türk, A., & Özkök, M. (2020). Shipyard location selection based on fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 39(3), 4557-4576. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-200522
• Ulutaş, A. (2020). SWARA tabanlı CODAS Yöntemi ile kargo şirketi seçimi. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(3), 1640-1647. doi: https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.559351
• Vojinović, N., Stević, Ž., & Tanackov, I. (2022). A Novel IMF SWARA-FDWGA-PESTEL analysis for assessment of healthcare system. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 5(1), 139-151. doi: https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta070422211v
• Vrtagić, S., Softić, E., Subotić, M., Stević, Ž., Dordevic, M., & Ponjavic, M. (2021). Ranking road sections based on MCDM model: New ımproved Fuzzy SWARA (IMF SWARA). Axioms, 10(2), 92. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10020092
• Wang, C. N., Huang, Y. F., Chai, Y. C., & Nguyen, V. T. (2018). A multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) for renewable energy plants location selection in Vietnam under a fuzzy environment. Applied Sciences, 8(11), 2069. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112069
• Xuan, H. A., Trinh, V. V., Techato, K., & Phoungthong, K. (2022). Use of hybrid MCDM methods for site location of solar-powered hydrogen production plants in Uzbekistan. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52, 101979. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.101979
• Yalçın, N., & Yapıcı Pehlivan, N. (2019). Application of the fuzzy CODAS method based on fuzzy envelopes for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: A case study on a personnel selection problem. Symmetry, 11(4), 493,1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11040493
• Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. ve Önder, E. (2016). Solving facility location problem for a plastic goods manufacturing company in turkey using AHP and TOPSIS methods. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(28), 223-249. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/660898
• Yenilmezel, S. ve Ertuğrul, İ. (2022). Çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ile bir mermer fabrikası için kesintisiz güç kaynağı seçimi. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(3), 251-266. doi: 10.52791/aksarayiibd.1009308
• Yeşilkaya, M. (2018). Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Kağıt Fabrikası Kuruluş Yeri Seçimi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(4), 31-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.21605/ cukurovaummfd.521775
• Yong, D. (2006). Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28(7), 839-844. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2436-5
• Yücenur, G. N., Çaylak, Ş., Gönül, G., & Postalcıoğlu, M. (2020). An integrated solution with SWARA&COPRAS methods in renewable energy production: City selection for biogas facility. Renewable Energy, 145, 2587-2597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.011