Konuralp SEZGİLİ

525109

Paternalist Liderliğin Örgütsel Kronizm Üzerindeki Rolünü Anlamak: Görgül Bir Araştırma

Çalışma yaşamında belirli kişi ve tarafların kayırılması, toplumsal ve yapısal etkilerinin yanı sıra çalışanların işe, örgüte ve diğer kişilere ilişkin tutum ve davranışları üzerinde yıkıcı etkilere sebep olmaktadır. Bununla ilgili olarak, örgütlerde işlemlerde ve kararlarda arkadaşların, siyasi ve profesyonel bağlantıların kayırılması olarak tarif edilen kronizm, örgütsel davranış araştırmalarında merak uyandıran konulardan biridir. Bu konuda yapılan araştırmalar, ağırlıklı olarak örgütlerde kronizm algısı ile çeşitli sonuç değişkenlerini ilişkilendirirken daha seyrek olarak kültür ve liderlik gibi öncülleri de inceleme odağına almıştır. Bu çabanın bir parçası olarak bu çalışmada, diğerlerinden farklı olarak, Türkiye’de baskın bir form olan paternalist liderliğin örgütsel kronizm algısı üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir. Çalışma için kamu ve özel sektörde çalışan 210 kişiden veri toplanmıştır. Kullanılan kavramların yapısı doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri ile test edildikten sonra hiyerarşik regresyon analizleri ile paternalist liderliğin örgütsel kronizm algısı üzerindeki etkileri gösterilmiştir. Bulgular, “iş yerinde aile ortamı”nın örgütsel kronizm algısını azalttığını göstermektedir. Öte yandan, paternalist liderliğin ikili doğasına uygun olarak, “sadakat beklentisi” ise bu algıyı artırmaktadır. Çalışmanın bulguları ilgili yazına başvurarak tartışılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Örgütsel kronizm, Paternalist liderlik, Sadakat beklentisi, İş yerinde aile ortamı

Understanding the Role of Paternalistic Leadership on Organizational Cronyism: An Empirical Study

Favoritism in the workplace has negative impacts on employees' behaviors and attitudes toward work, the organization, and other people, as well as social and structural consequences. In this regard, cronyism, defined as favoring friends, political and professional connections in organizational activities and decisions, is an intriguing issue in organizational behavior studies. Studies on this topic focus mostly on the relationship between the perception of cronyism in organizations and various outcome variables, with less emphasis on antecedents such as culture and leadership. As part of this effort, this study examined the impact of paternalistic leadership, which is prevalent in Turkey, on the perception of organizational cronyism, filling a research gap. Data was collected from 210 employees working in the public and private sectors. After testing the structure of the concepts with confirmatory factor analysis, hierarchical regression analyses revealed the impacts of paternalist leadership on the perception of organizational cronyism. Findings show that creating a "family atmosphere at work" has a negative influence on the perception of organizational cronyism. However, in accordance with the dualistic nature of paternalistic leadership, "loyalty expectation" has a negative impact on this perception. The findings of the study were discussed using the relevant literature.
Keywords:

Organizational cronyism, Paternalistic leadership, Loyalty expectation, Family atmosphere at work,

PDF

___

  • Aktaş, H. (2020). Paternalist liderlik. S. Polatçı. (Ed.) Kuramsal temelleriyle örgütsel davranış ölçekleri rehberi. (ss. 610-634). Ankara: Nobel.
  • Akuffo, I.N. and Kivipõld, K. (2017), “Leadership behaviour in the context of nepotism, cronyism, and favouritism: a review of the literature”. S. Morison. (Ed.), Leadership for improvement perceptions, influences and gender differences (ss. 255-282), Nova Publishers.
  • Akuffo, I. N., & Kivipõld, K. (2019). Influence of leaders’ authentic competences on nepotism-favoritism and cronyism. Management Research Review, 43(4), 369-386. http://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2019-0078
  • Ali, S., Shahzad, F., Hussain, I., Yongjian, P., Khan, M. M., & Iqbal, Z. (2022). The outcomes of organizational cronyism: A social exchange theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 805262-805262. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805262
  • Alpar, R. (2017). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler. Ankara: Detay
  • Araslı, H., & Tümer, M. (2008). Nepotism, favoritism and cronyism: A study of their effects on job stress and job satisfaction in the banking industry of north cyprus. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 36(9), 1237-1250. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2008.36.9.1237
  • Asunakutlu, T., & Avcı, U. (2010). Aile işletmelerinde nepotizm algısı ve iş tatmini ilişkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 93-109.
  • Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10‐country comparison. Applied psychology, 49(1), 192-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00010
  • Aycan, Z. (2001). Human resource management in turkey ‐ Current issues and future challenges. International Journal of Manpower, 22(3), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720110398347
  • Aycan, Z. (2006) Paternalism: towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. K.S. Yang, K. K. Hwang ve Kim, U. (Eds.) Scientific Advances in Indigenous Psychologies: Empirical, Philosophical and Cultural Contributions. (ss. 445–466), Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_20
  • Aycan, Z. (2015). Paternalistic leadership. C. Cooper (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Management, Wiley & Sons.
  • Aycan, Z., Schyns, B., Sun, J. M., Felfe, J., & Saher, N. (2013). Convergence and divergence of paternalistic leadership: A cross-cultural investigation of prototypes. Journal of International Business Studies, 44, 962-969. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.48
  • Balliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 140(6), 1556. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0037737
  • Bedi, A. (2019). A meta‐analytic review of paternalistic leadership. Applied Psychology, 69(3), 960-1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12186
  • Begley, T., Khatri, N., & Tsang, E. (2010). Networks and cronyism: A social exchange analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(2), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9137-4
  • Bellow, A. (2003). In praise of nepotism: A natural history. Doubleday.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
  • Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective trust in chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of management, 40(3), 796-819. doi: 10.1177/0149206311410604
  • Cheng, B.S., Chou, L.F., & Farh, J.L. (2000). A triad model of paternalistic leadership: The constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14, 3–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410604
  • Cingöz, A., & Akıllı, H. S. (2015). a study on examining the relationship among cronyism, self reported job performance and organizational trust. WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings. (ss. 7-11), Viyana, Avusturya. http://www.westeastinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Ayse-and-Serkan.pdf
  • Cobanoglu, C., Moreo, P. J., & Warde, B. (2001). A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods. International journal of market research, 43(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530104300401
  • Colella, A., Garcia, F., Reidel, L., & Triana, M. (2005, August). Paternalism: Hidden discrimination. In meeting of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, Hawaii, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri.
  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  • De Clercq, D., Fatima, T., & Jahanzeb, S. (2022). Cronies, procrastinators, and leaders: A conservation of resources perspective on employees’ responses to organizational cronyism. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(1), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1928076
  • Dedahanov, A. T., Fayzullaev, A. K. U., Abdurazzakov, O. S., Rakhmonov, D. A., & Zakirova, O. (2022). Paternalistic Leadership Styles and Employee Voice: The Roles of Trust in Supervisors and Self-Efficacy. Sustainability, 14(19), 12805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912805
  • Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005
  • Elibol, G., & Sever, E. (2022). Örgütsel kronizmin işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinde, işe yabancılaşmanın aracı rolü. İktisat İşletme ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 1(1), 18-38.
  • Erden, P., & Otken, A. B. (2019). The dark side of paternalistic leadership: Employee discrimination and nepotism. European Research Studies, 22(2), 154-181.
  • Ertureten, A., Cemalcilar, Z., & Aycan, Z. (2013). The relationship of downward mobbing with leadership style and organizational attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1468-2
  • Farh, L. J., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in chinese organizations. J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui ve E. Weldon (Ed.), Management and organizations in the chinese context (ss. 84-127), Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511590_5
  • Farh, J.L., Cheng, B.S., Chou, L.F., & Chu, X.P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: Employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in China. Tsui, A. S., Y. Bian ve L. Cheng (Ed.) China’s domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance (ss. 230–260). Sharpe. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315705804
  • Gerçek, M. (2018). Yöneticilerin babacan (paternalist) liderlik davranışlarının psikolojik sözleşme bağlamındaki beklentileri üzerindeki etkilerine yönelik bir çalışma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.390533
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2014). Pearson new international edition. Multivariate data analysis, seventh edition. Pearson.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Hofstede, G. H., & Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.
  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
  • Hudson, S. ve Claasen, C. (2017). Nepotism and cronyism as a cultural phenomenon?. M. S. Aßländer ve S. Hudson (Ed.). The handbook of business and corruption (ss. 95-118). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78635-445-720161006
  • Jackson, T. (2016). Paternalistic leadership: The missing link in cross-cultural leadership studies?. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 16(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595816637701
  • Jaskiewicz, P., Uhlenbruck, K., Balkin, D. B., & Reay, T. (2013). Is nepotism good or bad? Types of nepotism and implications for knowledge management. Family Business Review, 26(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486512470841
  • Jawahar, I. M., Bilal, A. R., Fatima, T., & Mohammed, Z. J. (2021). Does organizational cronyism undermine social capital? Testing the mediating role of workplace ostracism and the moderating role of workplace incivility. Career Development International, 26(5), 657-677. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-09-2020-0228
  • Jones, R.G., & Stout, T. (2015). Policing nepotism and cronyism without losing the value of social connection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2014.3
  • Keles, H. N., Ozkan, T. K., & Bezirci, M. (2011). A study on the effects of nepotism, favoritism and cronyism on organizational trust in the auditing process in family businesses in Turkey. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 10(9), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v10i9.5622
  • Khatri, N., & Tsang, E. W. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of cronyism in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023081629529
  • Khatri, N., Tsang, E. W., & Begley, T. M. (2006). Cronyism: a cross-cultural analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400171
  • Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2013). Does an educated mind take the broader view? A field experiment on in-group favouritism among microcredit clients. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 45, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2013.02.021
  • Lazar, J., & Preece, J. (1999). Designing and implementing web-based surveys. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 39(4), 63-67.
  • Mendonca, M., Kanungo, R. N., & Aycan, Z. (1999). Culture: The forgotten factor in human resource management. Vision, 3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/097226299900300202
  • Merriam-Webster. (t.y.). Favoritism. İçinde Merriam-Webster.com thesaurus. Erişim tarihi Ağustos 26, 2022, erişim adres https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/favoritism.
  • Merriam-Webster. (t.y.). Cronyism. İçinde Merriam-Webster.com thesaurus. Erişim tarihi Ağustos 26, 2022, erişim adresi https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/cronyism.
  • Niu, C. P., Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2009). Effectiveness of a moral and benevolent leader: Probing the interactions of the dimensions of paternalistic leadership. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(1), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.01267.x
  • Online Etymology Dictionary. (t.y.). Cronyism. İçinde Etymonline.com. Erişim tarihi Ağustos 26, 2022, erişim adresi https://www.etymonline.com/cronyism.
  • Osborn, R. N., Uhl-Bien, M., & Milosevic, I. (2014). The context and leadership. D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (ss. 589-612), Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.001.0001
  • Osland, J. S., De Franco, S., & Osland, A. (1999). Organizational implications of latin american culture: Lessons for the expatriate manager. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/105649269982018
  • Ötken, A. B., & Cenkci, T. (2012). The impact of paternalistic leadership on ethical climate: The moderating role of trust in leader. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 525-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1108-2
  • Özen, Y., & Gül, A. (2007). Sosyal ve eğitim bilimleri araştırmalarında evren-örneklem sorunu. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (15), 394-422.
  • Paşa, S., H. Kabasakal and M. Bodur. (2001). Society, organisations, and leadership in turkey, Applied Psychology: An International Review 50(4), 559-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00073
  • Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316063
  • Pellegrini, E. K., Scandura, T. A., & Jayaraman, V. (2010). Cross-cultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: An expansion of leader-member exchange theory. Group & Organization Management, 35(4), 391-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110378456
  • Pelletier, K. L., & Bligh, M. C. (2008). The aftermath of organizational corruption: Employee attributions and emotional reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 823-844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9471-8
  • Pelenk, S. E., & Acaray, A. (2019). Paternalist liderliğin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları üzerine etkisi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 14(5). 184-189. https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.23015
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  • Porter, L. W., & McLaughlin, G. B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 559–557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.002
  • Reis, Harry T. & Judd, C. M. (2013). Conducting research on the internet. H. T. Reis ve C. Judd. (Ed.) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. (ss. 443–470), Cambridge University Press.
  • Riaz, A. (2018). Impact of ethical leadership on organizational cronyism through mediating role of ethical culture and moderating role of leader member exchange. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12(3), 831-850.
  • Saleem, M. A., Yaseen, A., & Zahra, S. (2018). Predictors of organizational commitment in public sector hospitals of Pakistan -A moderated mediation study. Journal of Health Management, 20(2), 206-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063418763656
  • Shaheen, S., Bashir, S., & Khan, A. K. (2017). Examining organizational cronyism as an antecedent of workplace deviance in public sector organizations. Public Personnel Management, 46(3), 308-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026017716655
  • Shaheen, S., Zulfiqar, S., Saleem, S., & Shehazadi, G. (2020). Does organizational cronyism lead to lower employee performance? Examining the mediating role of employee engagement and moderating role of islamic work ethics. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 579560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579560
  • Smierciak, S. (2021). Cronyism and Elite Capture in Egypt: From Businessmen Cabinet to Military Inc. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003185345
  • Soylu, S. (2011). Creating a family or loyalty-based framework: The effects of paternalistic leadership on workplace bullying. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0651-6
  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2015). Çok değişkenli istatistiklerin kullanımı. Nobel Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Tekin, E. (2019). Paternalist liderliğin iş tatmini ve çalışan performansına etkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 54(1), 178-204. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.19.03.1087
  • Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. New York: Irwin. Turhan, M. (2014). Organizational cronyism: A scale development and validation from the perspective of teachers. Journal of business ethics, 123, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1839-3
  • Turhan, M., & Erol, Y. C. (2019). Öğretmen görüşlerine göre eğitim örgütlerinde kronizm, sessizlik ve sinizm arasındaki ilişki. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(4), 874-886.
  • The jamovi project (2022). Jamovi. (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org. Wagstaff, M. F., Collela, A., Triana, M. D. C., Smith, A. N., & Watkins, M. B. (2015). Subordinates’ perceptions of supervisor paternalism: a scale development. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(6), 659-674. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0287
  • Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.634
  • Wated, G., & Sanchez, J. I. (2015). Managerial tolerance of nepotism: The effects of individualism–collectivism in a Latin American context. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2195-7
  • Wu, M., & Xu, E. (2012). Paternalistic leadership: from here to where?. X. Huang ve M. Bond. (Ed.). Handbook of Chinese Organizational Behavior: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice (s. 449-466), Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857933409.00032
  • Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
  • Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 66-85. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0088
  • Yürür, S. (2021) Sosyal mübadele kuramı. İçinde: S. Yürür (Eds.) Örgütsel davranış kuramları (ss.245-280).
  • Zhu, J., Song, L. J., Zhu, J., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). Visualizing the landscape and evolution of leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.003
Journal of Organizational Behavior Review-Cover
  • ISSN: 2687-2609
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2019
  • Yayıncı: Sema POLATCI
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Şirket (Ekip) Kaynak Yönetimi (EKY) İle Tedarik Zinciri Entegrasyonunun (TZE) Güçlendirilmesi: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve Önerisi

Yasemin ÜLKER

Sessiz İstifa: Sonun Başlangıcı mı Yeniden Diriliş mi?

Kadir ÇALIŞKAN

Paternalist Liderliğin Örgütsel Kronizm Üzerindeki Rolünü Anlamak: Görgül Bir Araştırma

Konuralp SEZGİLİ

Uzun Formundan Kısa Formlarına Ölçek Revizyonu: Pozitif Liderlik Ölçeği Uygulaması

Ali Murat ALPARSLAN, Nisa EKŞİLİ

Aile İşletmelerinde Başarının Anahtarı: Kişisel Niteliklerin, Yönetim Becerilerinin ve Fırsat Farkındalığının İncelenmesi

Begüm AL