USABILITY COMPARISON OF LARGE TOUCHSCREEN SYSTEMS VERSUS DESKTOP-SIZE AND MOBILE-SIZE SCREEN SYSTEMS

Öz In computer graphics, proposing efficient and usable human-computer interaction design solutions is a challenging task. Well defined guidelines and principles are very useful for designers to design new solutions for systems. To create these guidelines and principles, firstly differences among systems should be identified. In this study, we focused on comparing large screen systems and mobile-size/desktop-size screen systems by observing users while they interact with all three different size screens. We noticed that there are physical differences between these systems such as viewing distance, pixel count and weight. We also noticed that there are different applications for different usage areas. According to this, eight types of differences are defined and usability differences are categorized into these difference types. As a result, we conclude that large touchscreen systems need separate interaction design guidelines and principles.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Large Screen Systems, Large Screen Usability Differences, Human

PDF

___

Shneiderman, B., & Ben, S. (2003). Designing the user interface. Pearson Education India., pp. 75-97

Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering.Elsevier., pp. 124-145

Nielsen, J. (1994, April). Usability inspection methods.In Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 413414).ACM.

Elrod, S., Bruce, R., Gold, R., Goldberg, D., Halasz, F., Janssen, W., ...& Welch, B. (1992, June). Liveboard: a large interactive display supporting group meetings, presentations, and remote collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 599-607). ACM.

Somervell, J. P., Wahid, S., &McCrickard, D. S. (2003, September). Usability Heuristics for Large Screen Information Exhibits. In INTERACT (pp. 904-907).

Kim, H., & Snow, S. (2013, February). Collaboration on a large-scale, multi-touch display: asynchronous interaction and multiple-input use. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion (pp. 165-168). ACM.

Jagodic, R. (2011). Collaborative interaction and display space organization in large high-resolution environments.

Woods, V., Hastings, S., Buckle, P., & Haslam, R. (2002). Ergonomics of using a mouse or other non-keyboard input device. © Health and Safety Executive.

Word Processing. (2015, April19). Retrieved from http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/word_processing.aspx

Maarse, F. J., Mulder, L. J. M., Brand, A. N., &Akkerman, A. E. (2006). Clinical assessment, computerized methods, and instrumentation. Psychology Press., pp. 182-183

Gartner Says Touchscreen Mobile Device Sales Will Grow 97 Percent in 2010. (2015, June 8). Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/1313415

Statistics on mobile usage and adoption to inform your mobile marketing strategy. (2015, July 2). Retrieved from http://www.smartinsights.com/mobile-marketing/mobile-marketinganalytics/mobile-marketing-statistics/

Karlson, A. K., &Bederson, B. B. (2007). ThumbSpace: generalized one-handed input for touchscreen-based mobile devices. In HumanComputer Interaction–INTERACT 2007 (pp. 324-338).Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Park, Y. S., & Han, S. H. (2010). Touch key design for one-handed thumb interaction with a mobile phone: Effects of touch key size and touch key location. International journal of industrial ergonomics, 40(1), 68-76.

Isokoski, P., &Raisamo, R. Device Independent Text Input: A Rationale and an Example; May 23-26, 2000. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces AVI2000 (pp. 76-83).

Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering-Cover

ISSN: 1304-2025
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2003
Yayıncı: Milli Savunma Üniversitesi Deniz Harp Okulu Dekanlığı

Arşiv