___

• Ankrah, S., Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities—industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31, 387—408
• Ankrah, S. N., Burgess, T. F., Grimshaw, P., Shaw, N. E. (2013). Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: What single-group studies of motives omit. Technovation, 33(2-3): 50—65
• Argyris, C., Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. MA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
• Bekkers, R. N. A., Freitas, I. M. B. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10): 1837-1853.
• Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7): 858–68.
• Cresswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research. 2nd Sage; Thousand Oaks: CA.
• Cricelli, L., Grimaldi, M. (2010). Knowledge-based inter-organizational collaborations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(3): 348—358.
• D’este, P., Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3): 316-339.
• DGCA. (2017). Sivil havacilik genel müdürlüğü faaliyet rapor. Retrieved from http://web.shgm.gov.tr/documents/sivilhavacilik/files/pdf/kurumsal/faaliyet/2017.pdf.
• Draghici, A, Baban, C. F., Gogana, M. L., Ivascua, L. V. (2015). A knowledge management approach for the university-industry collaboration in open innovation. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23: 23-32
• Dutrénit, G., De Fuentes, C., Torres, A. (2010). Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy, 37(7): 513-526.
• George, G., Zahra, S. A., Wood, D. R. (2002). The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6): 577-609.
• Gopalakrishnan, S., Santoro, M. D. (2004). Distinguishing between knowledge transfer and technology transfer activities: The role of key organisation factors. IEEE Transaction of Engineering Management, 51(1):57-69.
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4): 375—387.
• Guimón, J. (2013). Promoting university-industry collaboration in developing countries. World Bank. Retrieved from http://innovationpolicyplatform.org/sites/default/files/rdf_imported_documents/PromotingUniversityIndustryCollaborationInDevelopingCountries.pdf
• Harman, G., Sherwell, V. (2002). Risks in university–industry research links and the implications for university management. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(1): 37-51.
• Joseph, K. J., Abraham, V. (2009). University-industry interactions and innovation in India: patterns, determinants, and effects in select industries. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22(4): 467-498.
• Klofsten, M., Jones-Evans, D., Lindell, P. (1996). Growth factors in technology-based spin-offs: A Swedish study. Piccola Impresa/Small Business Journal, 10(3): 1-25.
• Lee, J., Win, H. N. (2004). Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore. Technovation, 24(5), 433-442.
• Levin, R. C. (1988). Appropriability, R&D spending and technological performance. The American Economic Review, 78(2): 424-428.
• Logar, C. M., Ponzurick, T. G., Spears, J. R., France, K. R. (2001). Commercializing intellectual property: A university—industry alliance for new product development. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(4): 206-217.
• Muscio, A., Vallanti, G. (2014). Perceived obstacles to university–industry collaboration: Results from a qualitative survey of Italian academic departments. Industry and Innovation, 21(5): 410-429.
• OSYM. (2018). Merkezi yerlestirme ile ogrenci alan yuksekogretim lisans programları. Retrieved from https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2018/YKS/YER/Tablo4MinMax_31082018.pdf
• Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6): 343-373.
• Pavitt, K. L. R. (1988). International patterns of technological accumulation. In Hood, N & Vahlne J. E. (Eds), Strategies in global competition. London: Croom Helm.
• Rasiah, R., Govindaraju, V. G. R. (2009). University - industry R&D collaboration in the automotive, biotechnology and electronics firms in Malaysia. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22(4): 529-550.
• Salter, A. J., B. R. Martin (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30(3): 509-539.
• Santoro, M. D., Betts, S. C. (2002). Making industry-university partnerships work. Research Technology Management, 45(3): 42- 46.
• Santoro, M. D., Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry—university interactions. Research Policy, 31(7): 1163—1180.
• Santoro, M. D., Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry—university collaborative ventures. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(3-4): 299—319.
• Schiller, D. (2006). Nascent innovation systems in developing countries: University responses to regional needs in Thailand. Industry and Innovation, 13(4): 481-504.
• Schiller, D., Lee, K. (2015). Are university-industry linkages meaningful for catch-up? A comparative analysis of five Asian countries. In Albuquerque, E., Wilson, S., Kruss,G. Lee, K. (Eds.) Developing National Systems of Innovation: University–Industry Interactions in the Global South (pp. 55-92). Cheltenham: Elgar.
• Sherwood, A. L., Butts, S. B., Kacar, S. L. (2004). Partnering for knowledge: A learning framework for university—industry collaboration. Midwest Academy of Management, 2004 Annual Meeting, 1—17.
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1): 27-48.
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2): 115-142.
• Smirnova, Y. V. (2015). University–industry knowledge transfer in an emerging economy: Evidence from Kazakhstan. Science and Public Policy, 43(5): 702–712.
• Striukova, L., Rayna, T. (2015). University-industry knowledge exchange: An exploratory study of open innovation in UK universities. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(4): 471-492.
• Teece, D. (1987). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. In: Teece, D. (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge. Ballinger, Cambridge: MA.
• Ulrich, D. (1998). Intellectual Capital = Competence X Commitment. Sloan Management Review, 39: 15-26.
• Welsh, R., Glenna, L., Lacy, W. (2008). Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism. Research Policy, 37(10): 1854–1864.