___

• Çalışkan MK. Endodontide Tanı ve Tedaviler. Endodontik tedavi sonrası restorasyon. İstanbul, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2006, 466.
• Hansen EK. In vivo cusp fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with MOD amalgam or MOD resin fillings. Dent Mat J. 1988; 4: 169-73.
• Hansen EK, et al. In vivo fractured of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored amalgam. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990; 6:
• Smidt A, Venezia E. Techniques for immediate core build up of endodontically treated teeth. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34: 258-268.
• Kantor ME, Pines MS. A comparative study of techniques for pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1977; 38: 405-412.
• Chan RW, Bryant RW. Post-core foundations for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 48: 401-406.
• Hoag EP & Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 47(2): 177-181.
• Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984a; 51: 780-784.
• Taleghani M, Morgan RW. Reconstructive materials for endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57: 446-449.
• Wilson NH, Setcos JC, Dummer PM et al. A split-shank prefabricated post system: A critical multidisciplinary rewiev. Quintessence Int. 1997; 28: 737-743.
• Bonilla ED, Mardirossian G & Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of variosus core build-up materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 9 (1): 14
• Cho GC, Kaneko LM, Donoven TE & White SN. Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials. J Prosthet Dent. ; 82 (3): 272-276. Gelfand M, Goldman M & Sunderman EJ. Effect of complete veneer crowns on the compressive strength of endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52 (5): 635-638.
• Kostka E, Roulet JF.: Textbook of endodontology (Ed. by Bergenholtz G, Bindsley PH and Reit C), 1st Ed, Singapore, Blackwell Publishing Co, 2003, 177-191.
• Ziebert AJ, Dhuru VB. The Fracture toughness of various core materials. Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 4: 33-37.
• Yıldız M. Sonlu elemanlar ve mekanik stres analiz yöntemleri kullanılarak davranışlarının incelenmesi, Doktora Tezi, Erzurum, 1997.
• Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials, 11 th ed, St. Louis, 2002, Mosby Co, 247.
• Nyyar A. Coronal-radicular built up for endodontically treated teeth. Clinically Dent. 1983; 4 (26): 1-27.
• Kane JJ, Burgess JO and Summitt JB. Fracture resistance of amalgam coronal radicular restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 613.
• Alaçam T, Nalbant L, Alaçam A. İleri Restorasyon Teknikleri, 1. Baskı, Ankara, Polat Basımevi, 1998, 47-135.
• Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal Cycling Procedures for Laboratory Testing of Dental Restorations. J Dent. 1999; 27: 89-99.
• Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dent Mater. 2006; 22: 477 – 485.
• Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. ; 8: 59–67. Burke FJ, Watts DC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int. 1994; 25: 335–340.
• Capp NJ, Warren K. An advantage of the direct post and core technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 712–713.
• Hudis SI, Goldstein GR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 55: 33–38.
• Nissan J, Dmitry Y, Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86: 304–308.
• Naasan MA, Watson TF. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 1998; 11: 36–45. kuvvet altındaki