Alper SARI, Elif DİZEN KAZAN

How readable are antihypertensive drug inserts?

Aim: Patients can be protected against possible complications when antihypertensive drugs are regularly and properly used for the treatment of hypertension. The readability of package inserts increases treatment compliance. In the present study, the purpose was to determine the readability level of antihypertensive package inserts. Materials and Method: A total of 64 commonly used antihypertensive drugs were selected for this study. The readability scores of the package inserts for the selected drugs were calculated according to the Readability Scales developed by Atesman and Bezirci-Yılmaz. Results: The readability level for the selected package inserts were found to be suitable for an average of 11-12 years of education and high school education level according to the Atesman and Bezirci-Yılmaz Readability Scales, respectively. Conclusion: When it is considered that the average schooling year in Turkey is 6.5 years, the readability level of antihypertensive package inserts is highly above this level. It is recommended to simplify the package inserts to increase readability and drug compliance and prevent incorrect drug use.

Keywords:

Hypertension Drug package insert, Readability level,

PDF

___

Wermelt JA, Schunkert H. Management of arterial hypertension. Herz 2017; 42: 515–26.
Paudel P, Chalise S, Neupane DR, Adhikari N, Paudel S, Dangi NB. Prevalence of hypertension in a community. J Nepal Med Assoc 2020; 58: 1011–17.
Verma N, Rastogi S, Chia YC, et al. Non-pharmacological management of hypertension. J Clin Hypertens 2021; 23: 1275–83.
Lou M, Zong XF, Wang LL. Curative treatment of hypertension by physical exercise. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017; 21: 3320–6.
Aydogdu S, Güler K, Bayram F, et al 2019 Turkish hypertension consensus report. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2019; 47: 535–46.
Iptes S, Khorshid L. Üniversite ögrencilerinin ilaç kullanim durumlarının incelenmesi. EGEHFD 2004; 20 : 97–106.
Karakurt P. Hacıhasanoglu R, Yıldırım A, Sağlam R. Medication use among university students. TAF Prev Med Bull 2010; 9 : 505-12 .
Özçetin K, Karakuş N. Readability of the 8th grade turkish textbooks. Türkiye Egitim Dergisi 2020; 5: 175-90.
Carkıt C, Bahadır HI. An investigation on the readability levels of the national struggle and Atatürk theme texts in secondary school turkish textbooks. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education 2022; 11: 103–11.
Ateşman E. Türkçede okunabilirliğin ölçülmesi. Dil Dergisi 1997; 58: 71–4.
Bezirci B, Yılmaz E.. Metinlerin okunabilirliğinin ölçülmesi üzerine bir yazılım kütüphanesi ve Türkçe için yeni bir okunabilirlik ölçütü. DEÜ Fen ve Mühendislik Derg 2010; 12: 49–62..
Walsh TM, Volsko TA. Readability assessment of Internet-based consumer health information. Respir Care 2008; 53: 1310–5
Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948; 32: 221–33.
Kasar KS, Karadakovan A. Elderly individuals investigation of antihypertensive drugs use error. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2017; 8: 20–7
Solmaz T, Akın B. Medication use and ability of self-medication use in elderly living at home.Turkish Journal Of Geriatrics 2009; 12: 72–81
Ay İE, Duranoğlu Y. Göz damlalarinin prospektüs formlarin okunabilirlik düzeyinin değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Klin Tıp Bilim Derg 2021; 1: 55–9.
Dural IE. Are consent forms used in cardiology clinics easy to read? Archives Turkish Soc Cardiol 2022; 50: 590-4.
Boztaş N, Özbilgin S, Öçmen E, et al. Evaluating the readibility of informed consent forms available before anaesthesia: a comparative study. Turk J Anaaesth Reanim 2014; 42: 140–4.
Ebem E, Tutar MS, Yıldız M, Canıtez A, Kara Ö, Kozanhan B. A readability assessment of intramuscular and intravenous injection informed consent forms. Anadolu Klin Tıp Bilim Derg 2019; 24: 132–6.
Kara I, Kökoğlu K, Şan F, Orhan I. Türkiye' de kbb hastalıkları alanında sık kullanılan onam formlarının okunabilirliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. KBB Forum 2020; 19: 153-60
Yeşilyurt ME, Karadeniz O, Gülel FE, Çağlar A, Kangallı Uyar SG. Mean and expected years of schooling for provinces in Turkey. Pamukkale J Eurasian Socioecon Stud 2016; 3: 1–7.