___

• Ahlholm, P., Sipilä, K., Vallittu, P., Jakonen, M., Kotiranta, U., 2018. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J. Prosthodont. 27, 35-41.
• Alghazzawi, T.F., 2016. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J. Prosthodont. Res. 60, 72-84.
• Arısan, V., Karabuda, C.Z., Özdemir, T., 2010a. Implant surgery using bone‐and mucosa‐supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post‐operative outcomes of computer‐aided vs. standard techniques. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 21, 980-988.
• Arısan, V., Karabuda, Z.C., Özdemir, T., 2010b. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer‐aided implant placement: a computed tomography‐based clinical comparative study. J. Periodontol. 81, 43-51.
• Block, M.S., Emery, R.W., 2016. Static or dynamic navigation for implant placement—choosing the method of guidance. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 74, 269-277.
• Buser, D., Martin, W., Belser, U.C., 2004. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants. 19, 43-61.
• Coachman, C., Calamita, M.A., Coachman, F.G., Coachman, R.G., Sesma, N., 2017. Facially generated and cephalometric guided 3D digital design for complete mouth implant rehabilitation: a clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent. 117, 577-586.
• D'haese, J., Ackhurst, J., Wismeijer, D., De Bruyn, H., Tahmaseb, A., 2017. Current state of the art of computer‐guided implant surgery. Periodontol. 2000. 73, 121-133.
• De Angelis, P., Passarelli, P.C., Gasparini, G., Boniello, R., D'amato, G., De Angelis, S., 2020. Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 123, 252-256.
• Dörner, K., Edelman, D., 2015. What ‘digital’really means. McKinsey Digital. Dostępny w Internecie: https://www. mckinsey. com/industries/high-tech/our-insights/what-digital-really-means.
• Ender, A., Attin, T., Mehl, A., 2016a. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J. Prosthet. Dent. 115, 313-320.
• Ender, A., Mehl, A., 2013. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 16, 11-21.
• Ender, A., Mehl, A., 2015. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence. Int. 46, 9-17.
• Ender, A., Zimmermann, M., Attin, T., Mehl, A., 2016b. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin. Oral. Investig. 20, 1495-1504.
• Ender, A., Zimmermann, M., Mehl, A., 2019. Accuracy of complete-and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 22, 11-19.
• Esposito, M., Ekestubbe, A., Gröndahl, K., 1993. Radiological evaluation of marginal bone loss at tooth surfaces facing single Brånemark implants. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 4, 151-157.
• Fasbinder, D.J., 2006. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. The J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 137, 22S-31S.
• Fasbinder, D.J., 2013. Computerized technology for restorative dentistry. Am J Dent. 26, 115-120.
• Giménez, B., Özcan, M., Martínez‐Rus, F., Pradíes, G., 2015. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 17, e54-e64 . Gimenez‐Gonzalez, B., Hassan, B., Özcan, M., Pradíes, G., 2017. An in vitro study of factors influencing the performance of digital intraoral impressions operating on active wavefront sampling technology with multiple implants in the edentulous maxilla. J. Prosthodont. 26, 650-655.
• Grunder, U., Gracis, S., Capelli, M., 2005. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int. J. Periodontics. Restorative. Dent. 25, 113-119.
• Haddadi, Y., Bahrami, G., Isidor, F., 2018. Effect of software version on the accuracy of an intraoral scanning device. Int. J. Prosthodont. 31, 375-376.
• Joda, T., Brägger, U., 2015. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 26, 1430-1435.
• Joda, T., Brägger, U., 2016. Time‐efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 27, 1401-1406.
• Joda, T., Derksen, W., Wittneben, J.G., Kuehl, S., 2018. Static computer‐aided implant surgery (s‐CAIS) analysing patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs), economics and surgical complications: A systematic review. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 29, 359-373.
• Joda, T., Ferrari, M., Brägger, U., 2017a. Monolithic implant‐supported lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete digital workflow: A prospective clinical trial with a 2‐year follow‐up. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 19, 505-511.
• Joda, T., Lenherr, P., Dedem, P., Kovaltschuk, I., Bragger, U., Zitzmann, N.U., 2017b. Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 28, 1318-1323.
• Joda, T., Zarone, F., Ferrari, M., 2017c. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC. Oral. Health. 17, 124.
• Katsoulis, J., Pazera, P., Mericske‐Stern, R., 2009. Prosthetically driven, computer‐guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 11, 238-245.
• Mangano, F., Gandolfi, A., Luongo, G., Logozzo, S., 2017. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC. Oral. Health. 17, 149. Margvelashvili-Malament, M., Att, W., 2019. Current workflows for computer-aided implant surgery: a review article. Curr. Oral. Health. Rep. 6, 295-305.
• Miyazaki, T., Hotta, Y., 2011. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust. Dent. J. 56, 97-106.
• Mizumoto, R.M., Yilmaz, B., 2018. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 120, 343-352.
• Mühlemann, S., Kraus, R.D., Hämmerle, C.H., Thoma, D.S., 2018. Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant‐supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 29, 184-195.
• Patzelt, S.B., Emmanouilidi, A., Stampf, S., Strub, J.R., Att, W., 2014a. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin. Oral. Investig.. 18, 1687-1694.
• Patzelt, S.B., Lamprinos, C., Stampf, S., Att, W., 2014b. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am. Dent. Assoc. 145, 542-551.
• Patzelt, S.B., Vonau, S., Stampf, S., Att, W., 2013. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws J Am. Dent. Assoc. 144, 914-920.
• Rekow, E.D., 2020. Digital dentistry: The new state of the art—Is it disruptive or destructive? Dent. Mater. 36, 9-24.
• Sailer, I., Mühlemann, S., Fehmer, V., Hämmerle, C.H., Benic, G.I., 2019. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: Time efficiency of complete-arch digital scans versus conventional impressions. J. Prosthet. Dent. 121, 69-75.
• Selz, C.F., Vuck, A., Guess, P.C., 2016. Full-mouth rehabilitation with monolithic CAD/CAM-fabricated hybrid and all-ceramic materials: A case report and 3-year follow up. Quintessence. Int. 47, 115-121.
• Stapleton, B.M., Lin, W.S., Ntounis, A., Harris, B.T., Morton, D., 2014. Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent. 112, 402-408.
• Tahmaseb, A., Wu, V., Wismeijer, D., Coucke, W., Evans, C., 2018. The accuracy of static computer‐aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 29, 416-435.
• Tapiea, L., Lebonb, N., Mawussic, B., Chabouisd, H.F., Durete, F., Attalf, J., 2015. Understanding dental CAD/CAM for restorations–the digital workflow from a mechanical engineering viewpoint. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 18, 21-44.
• Tarnow, D., Cho, S., Wallace, S., 2000. The effect of inter‐implant distance on the height of inter‐implant bone crest. J. Periodontol. 71, 546-549. Ting‐Shu, S., Jian, S., 2015. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J. Prosthodont. 24, 313-321.
• Van Noort, R., 2012. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent. Mater. 28, 3-12.
• Widmann, G., Bale, R.J., 2006. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery--a review. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants. 21, 305-313.
• Yuzbasioglu, E., Kurt, H., Turunc, R., Bilir, H., 2014. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC. Oral. Health. 14, 10.