Coding Schemes in 5G Networks for Error-free Communication

The fifth-generation mobile communication network (5G) technology is a significant topic in today`s mobile communication industry. However, due to difficulties in the wireless channel generally, error-free communication is a big challenge. Thus, channel coding is a technology incorporated in the 5G mobile systems for achieving reliable and error-free two-way connections. In terms of data rate, capacity, coverage, latency, energy consumption, and cost, the fifth-generation (5G) communication systems must outperform previous fourth-generation (4G) systems. In this paper, we attempt to compare and evaluate the main characteristics of 5G channel and the performance of channel coding candidates. Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes and polar are two capacity-achieving channel coding schemes that we concentrated on here. Block error rate (BLER), bit error rate (BER), computational complexity, and flexibility are all considered while analyzing the system. The results indicate that polar codes outperform the LDPC code systems, although LDPC is reasonable compared to other code systems.

Coding Schemes in 5G Networks for Error-free Communication

The fifth-generation mobile communication network (5G) technology is a significant topic in today`s mobile communication industry. However, due to difficulties in the wireless channel generally, error-free communication is a big challenge. Thus, channel coding is a technology incorporated in the 5G mobile systems for achieving reliable and error-free two-way connections. In terms of data rate, capacity, coverage, latency, energy consumption, and cost, the fifth-generation (5G) communication systems must outperform previous fourth-generation (4G) systems. In this paper, we attempt to compare and evaluate the main characteristics of 5G channel and the performance of channel coding candidates. Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes and polar are two capacity-achieving channel coding schemes that we concentrated on here. Block error rate (BLER), bit error rate (BER), computational complexity, and flexibility are all considered while analyzing the system. The results indicate that polar codes outperform the LDPC code systems, although LDPC is reasonable compared to other code systems.

___

  • Tsakmalis, A., Chatzinotas, S., and Ottersten, B. (2014). ”Modulation and Coding Classification for Adaptive Power Control in 5G Cognitive Communications. 2014 IEEE 15Th International Workshop On Signal Processing Advances In Wireless Communications (SPAWC).” doi: 10.1109/spawc.2014.6941505
  • Abdulwhab, W., and Kadhim, A. (2018). ”Comparative Study of Channel Coding Schemes for 5G. Journal Of Electronic Systems,” 8(3), 95. doi: 10.6025/jes/2018/8/3/95-102
  • Iscan, O., Lentner, D., and Xu, W. (2016). ”A Comparison of Channel Coding Schemes for 5G Short Message Transmission. 2016 IEEE Globe-com Workshops (GC Wkshps).” doi: 10.1109/glocomw.2016.7848804
  • Kim, H. (2015). ”Coding and modulation techniques for high spectral efficiency transmission in 5G and satcom. 2015 23Rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).” doi: 10.1109/eu-sipco.2015.7362884
  • Maunder, R. (2016). ”A Vision for 5G Channel Coding.” Accelercomm White Paper.
  • Fadlallah, Y., Tulino, A., Barone, D., Vettigli, G., Llorca, J., and Gorce, J. (2017). ”Coding for Caching in 5G Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine,” 55(2), 106-113. doi: 10.1109/mcom.2017.1600449cm
  • Gamage, H., Rajatheva, N., and Latva-aho, M. (2017). ”Channel coding for enhanced mobile broadband communication in 5G systems. 2017 European Conference On Networks And Communications (Eucnc).” doi: 10.1109/eucnc.2017.7980697
  • Kaykac Egilmez, Z., Xiang, L., Maunder, R., and Hanzo, L. (2020). ”The Development, Operation and Performance of the 5G Polar Codes. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials”, 22(1), 96-122. doi: 10.1109/comst.2019.2960746
  • Ligurgo, M. (2017). ”IoT for 5G: candidate coding schemes.” TORINO: POLITECNICO DI TORINO.
  • Do-Duy, T., and Vazquez Castro, M. (2018).” Design of network coding functionality for 5G networks”. Barcelona.
  • Sharma, A., and Salim, M. (2018). ”On The Feasibility of Polar Code as Channel Code Candidate for the 5G-IoT Scenarios. International Journal Of Future Generation Communication And Networking ” 11(3), 11-20. doi: 10.14257/ijfgcn.2018.11.3.02
  • Vukobratovic, D., Tassi, A., Delic, S., and Khirallah, C. (2018). ”Random Linear Network Coding for 5G Mobile Video Delivery. Information,” 9(4), 72. doi: 10.3390/info9040072
  • Arora, K., Singh, J., and Randhawa, Y. (2019). ”A survey on channel coding techniques for 5G wireless networks. Telecommunication Systems,” 73(4), 637-663. doi: 10.1007/s11235-019 00630-3
  • Bae, J., Abotabl, A., Lin, H., Song, K., and Lee, J. (2019). ”An overview of channel coding for 5G NR cellular communications. APSIPA Transactions On Signal And Information Processing,” 8. doi: 10.1017/atsip.2019.10
  • Mota, M., Araujo, D., Costa Neto, F., de Almeida, A., and Cavalcanti, F. (2019). ”Adaptive Modulation and Coding Based on Reinforcement Learning for 5G Networks. 2019 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).” doi: 10.1109/gcwkshps45667.2019.9024384
  • Pillet, C., Bioglio, V., and Condo, C. (2020). ”On List Decoding of 5G-NR Polar Codes. 2020 IEEE Wireless Communications And Networking Conference (WCNC).” doi: 10.1109/wcnc45663.2020.9120686
  • Shah, P., Vyavahare, P., and Jain, A. (2020). ”Performance Evolution of Modern Error Controlling Codes for future generation (5G) cellular systems: LDPC code.” doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-22526/v1