___

• Beckert, J. (1996), “What Is Sociological about Economic Sociology? Uncertainty and the Embeddedness of Economic Action”, Theory and So- ciety 25, 803–840.
• Beckert, J. (2003), “Economic Sociology and Embeddedness: How Shall We Conceptualize Economic Action?” Journal of Economic Issues 37: 3, 769-87.
• Bernstein, R. J. (1983), Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Bögenhold, D. (2010), “From Heterodoxy to Othodoxy and Vice Versa: Economics and Social Sciences in the Division of Academic Work”, Ame- rican Journal of Economics and Sociology, 69: 5, 1566-1590.
• Caille, A. (2007), “Sociology as Anti-Utilitarianism”, European Journal of Social Theory, 10: 2, 277-286.
• Clarke, S. (1982), Marx, Marginalism and Modern Sociology, London: Macmillan
• Colander, D. (2000) The death of neoclassical economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22, 127–143.
• Colander, D., Holt, R. P. F. and Rosser, J. B., (2004), “The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics”, Review of Political Economy, 16: 4, 485-499.
• Davis, J. B. (2006), “The Nature of Heterodox Economics”, Post-Autistic Economics Review, 40, 23-30.
• Davis, J. B. (2008), “The Turn in Recent Economics and Return of Ort- hodoxy”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, 349-366.
• Dow, S. C. (2011), “Heterodox Economics: History and Prospects”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35, 1151-1165.
• Frey, B. and Benz, M. (2004), “From Imperialism to Inspiration: A Survey of Economics and Psychology”, D. J., Marciano, A. and R. J. (eds), The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
• Granovetter, M. (1992), “Economic Institutions as Social Constructions: A Framework for Analysis”, Acta Sociologica, 35, 3-11.
• Groenewegen, J., C. Pitelis, and S-E. Sjostrand (eds.) (1995), On Eco- nomic Institutions, Theory and Application, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
• Heiskala, R. (2007), “Economy and Society: from Parsons through Ha- bermas to Semiotic Institutionalism”, Theory and Methods, 46: 2, 243-272.
• Hodgson, G. M. (1994), “The Return of Institutional Economics”, N.Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds.) The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Hodgson, G. M. (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics, Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, London: Routlege.
• Hodgson, G. M. (2008), “Prospects for Economic Sociology”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 38: 1, 133-149.
• Ingham, G. (1996), “Some Recent Changes in the Relationship Between Economics and Sociology”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20, 243-275.
• Joas, H. (1993), Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Joas, H. (1996), The Creativity of Action. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Kalberg, S. (2007), “A Cross-National Consensus on a Unified Sociolo- gical Theory? Some Inter-Cultural Obstacles”, European Journal of Social Theory, 10: 2, 206-219.
• Kilpinen, E. (2003), “Does Pragmatism Imply Institutionalism.” Journal of Economic Issues, 37: 2 291-304.
• Lawson, T. (2006), “The Nature of Heterodox Economics”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 483-505.
• Lee, F. S. (2010), “A Case for Ranking Heterodox Journals and Depart- ments”, On the Horizon, 16: 4, 241-251.
• O’Hara, P. A. (2010), “Can the Principles of Heterodox Political Economy Explain Its Own Re-Emergence and Development?”, On the Horizon, 16: 4, 260-278.
• Parsons, T. ([1937] 1968), The Structure of Social Action, New York: The Free Press.
• Robbins, L. (1932), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Eco- nomic Science. London: Macmillan
• Rorty, R. (1981), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Prin- ceton University Press.
• Rutherford, M. (2011), The Institutionalist Movement in American Eco- nomics, 1918-1947, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Smelser, N. J. And R. Swedberg (1994), “The Sociological Perspective on the Economy”, N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princetion: Princeton University Press.
• Swedberg, R. (1991), “Major Traditions of Economic Sociology”, Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 251-276.
• Swedberg, R. (2003), Principles of Economic Sociology, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Veblen, T. B. ([1923] 1964) Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
• Veblen, T. B. ([1919] 1990), The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
• Veblen, T. B. ([1921] 1990), The Engineers and the Price System. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
• Veblen, T. B. ([1899] 1994), The Theory of Leisure Class. New York: Dover Publications.
• Velthuis, O. (1999), “The Changing Relationship Between Economic Sociology and Institutional Economics: From Talcott Parsons to Mark Gra- novetter”, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58: 4, 629-649.
• Yılmaz, F. (2003), “İktisat ve Sosyoloji: Rakip Kardeşlerin Hakimiyet Kavgası”, Toplum ve Bilim, 95, 61-84
• Yılmaz, F. (2007), “Veblen and the Problem of Rationality”, Journal of Economic Issues, 41: 3, 841-862.
• Yılmaz, F. (2011), “Düşünceden Kaçış Çabasının Öyküsü: İktisadın Fel- sefeden Kopuşu”, O. İşler ve F. Yılmaz (der.) İktisadı Felsefeyle Düşünmek, İstanbul: İletişim
• Yonay, Y. and Breslau, D. (2006), “Marketing Models: The Culture of Mathematical Economics”, Sociological Forum, 21: 3, 345-386.
• Young, C. (2009), “The Emergence of Sociology from Political Economy in the United States: 1890 to 1940”, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 45: 2, 91-116.
• Zafirovski, M. (2004), “Paradigms for Analysis of Social Institutions: A case for sociological institutionalism”, International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 14:3, 363-397.