Dilek DEMİRBAŞ, Laura HOLLEVILLE, David BENNETT

41117

Evaluation and Comparison of Lean Manufacturing Practices in Britain and France: A Case Study of a Printing Solutions Organisation

Evaluation and Comparison of Lean Manufacturing Practices in Britain and France: A Case Study of a Printing Solutions Organisation

Purpose: The objective of this research is to investigate and analyse theimplementation of Lean philosophy in two production plants SMEs –onein Britain and one in France- both belonging to the same global Americanprinting solutions and technology services organısation. The aim of the studyis to analyse the impact of lean practices on employees and on the organisationitself as well as the critical factors for a successful implementation.Design/methodology/approach: Using a case study approach, thecollection of primary data for this dissertation consisted of semi-structuredface-to-face interviews – seven in Britain and five in France - as well asobservations in both SMEs during the visits on-site.Findings; The evaluation of Lean practices in both companies revealedsignificant similarities concerning the principal Lean practices implementedand a general agreement about the importance of Lean in the current workplace. On the other hand, the study indicated differences in terms of culturalissues and internal barriers for a successful Lean adoption.Research Limitations/Implications: The samples between both companieswere different in terms of job position distribution. This study providesrecommendations beneficial to other organisations adopting Lean.Originality/Value: The novelty of this study stems from the exploration ofworkers’ points of view in relation to Lean practices, their implementation andtheir value in the work environment. Although the investigation undertakenin this research is based on only two SMEs with different backgrounds, thisstudy would recommend how SMEs can develop and improve their Leanpractices in the working place.
PDF

___

  • Achanga, P., Shehab, E., Roy, R., & Nelder, G. (2006). Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(4), 460–471. http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/17410380610662889
  • Ahlstrom, P. (1998). Sequences in the implementation of lean production. European Management Journal, 16(3), 327–334.
  • Atkinson, P. (2010). ‘Lean’ is a cultural issue. Management Services, 54(2), 35–42.
  • Bamber, L., & Dale, B. G. (2000). Lean production: A study of application in a traditional manufacturing environment. Production Planning and Control, 11(3), 291–298.
  • Bhasin, S. (2012). An appropriate change strategy for lean success. Management Decision, 50(3), 439– 458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216223
  • Bhasin, S. (2012). Prominent obstacles to lean. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(4), 403–425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410401211212661
  • Bhasin, S., & Burcher, P. (2006). Lean viewed as a philosophy. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(1), 56–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410380610639506
  • Biazzo, S., & Panizzolo, R. (2000). The assessment of work organization in lean production: The relevance of the worker’s perspective. Integrated Manufacturing System, 11(1), 6–15.
  • Bicheno, J. (2004). The new lean toolbox - towards fast, flexible flow. Buckingham, UK: PICSIE Books.
  • Bicheno, J., & Holweg, M. (2009). The lean toolbox - the essential guide to lean transformation. Buckingham, UK: PICSIE Books.
  • Black, J. (2007). Design rules for implementing the Toyota production system. International Journal of Production Research, 45(16), 3639–3664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207540701223469
  • Brown, K. A., & Mitchell, T. R. (1991). A comparison of JIT and batch manufacturing: The role of performance obstacles. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 906–917.
  • Browning, T. R., & Heath, R. D. (2009). Reconceptualizing the effects of lean on production costs with evidence from the F-22 program. Journal of Operations Management, 23–44. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.03.009
  • Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (2004). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Coates, N., & Sloan, D. (2012). The Newcastle Business School Masters Dissertation. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
  • Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2009). Business Research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Corbett, S. (2007). Beyond manufacturing: The evolution of lean production. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 95–105.
  • de Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006). Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational, and levels-of-analysis issues. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 99–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.04.001
  • Delbridge, R., Lowe, J., & Oliver, N. (2000). Shopfloor responsibilities under lean teamworking. Human Relations, 53(11), 1459–1479.
  • Doolen, T. L., & Hacker, M. E. (2005). A Review of Lean Assessment in Organizations An Exploratory Study of Lean Practices by Electronics Manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 24(1), 55–67.
  • Eswaramoorthi, M., Kathiresan, G. R., Prasad, P., & Mohanram, P. (2011). A survey on lean practices in Indian machine tool industries. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52(9–12), 1091–1101.
  • Ghauri, P., & Gronhaug, K. (2010). Research methods in business studies. Harlow,UK: Pearson.
  • Gurumurthy, A., & Kodali, R. (2011). Design of lean manufacturing systems using value stream mapping with simulation a case study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22(4), 444–473.
  • Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004). Learning to evolve A review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 994–1011.
  • Hines, P., Martins, A. L., & Beale, J. (2010). Testing the boundaries of lean thinking: Observations from the legal public sector. Public Money & Management, 28(1), 35–40. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00616.x
  • Holweg, M. (2007). The genealogy of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 420–437.
  • Jayaraman, K., Kee, T. L., & Soh, K. L. (2012). The perceptions and perspectives of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) practitioners an empirical study in Malaysia. The TQM Journal, 24(5), 433–446.
  • Jha, S., Noori, H., & Michela, J. L. (1996). The dynamics of continuous improvement - aligning organizational attributes and activities for quality and productivity. International Journal of Quality, 1(1), 19–47.
  • Karlsson, C., & Åhlström, P. (1996). Assessing changes towards lean production. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2), 24–41.
  • Krafcik, J. F. (1988). Triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 41–52.
  • Landsbergis, P. A., Cahill, J., & Schnall, P. (1999). The impact of Lean production and related new systems of work organisation on worker health. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4(2), 108–130.
  • Li, S., Rao, S. S., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. (2005). Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices. Journal of Operations Management, 23(6), 618–641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.01.002
  • Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way: 14 Management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Losonci, D., Demeter, K., & Jenei, I. (2011). Factors influencing employee perceptions in lean transformations. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 30–43.
  • Maleyeff, J., Arnheiter, E. A., & Venkateswaran, V. (2012). The continuing evolution of Lean Six Sigma. The TQM Journal, 24(6), 542–555.
  • Mehri, D. (2006). The darker side of lean: An insider’s perspective on the realities of the Toyota production system. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 21–42.
  • Meiling, J., Backlund, F., & Johnsson, H. (2012). Managing for continuous improvement in off-site construction Evaluation of lean management principles. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(2), 141–158.
  • Nasab, H. H., Bioki, A. T., & Zare, K. H. (2012). Finding a probabilistic approach to analyze lean manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 29(30), 73–81.
  • Olivella, J., Cuatrecasas, L., & Gavilan, N. (2008). Work organisation practices for lean production. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 19(7), 798–811.
  • Pavnaskar, S. J., Gershenson, J. K., & Jambekar, A. B. (2003). Classification scheme for lean manufacturing tools. International Journal of Production Research, 41(13), 3075–3090.
  • Perez, M. P., & Sanchez, A. M. (2000). Lean production and supplier relations: A survey of practices in the Aragonese automotive industry. Technovation, 20(2), 665–676.
  • Pettersen, J. (2009). Defining lean production: some conceptual and practical issues. The TQM Journal, 21(2), 127–142.
  • Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative approaches. London, UK: Sage.
  • Salem, O., Solomon, J., Genaidy, A., & Minkarah, I. (2006). Lean construction: From theory to implementation. Journal of Management of Engineering, 22(4), 168–175.
  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students. Edingurgh, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Saurin, T. A., Marodin, G. A., & Ribeiro, J. L. (2011). A framework for assessing the use of lean production practices in manufacturing cells. International Journal of Production Research, 49(11), 3211–3230.
  • Scherrer-Rathje, M., Boyle, T. A., & Deflorin, P. (2009). Lean, take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation. Business Horizons, 52(1), 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. bushor.2008.08.004
  • Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Seppälä, P., & Klemola, S. (2004). How do employees perceive their organization and job when companies adopt principles of lean production? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 14(2), 157–180.
  • Sezen, B., Karakadilar, I. S., & Buyukozkan, G. (2012). Proposition of a model for measuring adherence to lean practices: Applied to Turkish automotive part suppliers. International Journal of Production Research, 50(14), 3878–3894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.603372
  • Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 129–149.
  • Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 785–805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019
  • Sim, K. L., & Rogers, J. W. (2009). Implementing lean production systems: Barriers to change. Management Research News, 32(1), 37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01409170910922014
  • Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. London, UK: Sage.
  • Soderquist, K., & Motwani, J. (1999). Quality issues in lean production implementation: A case study of a French automotive supplier. Total Quality Management, 10(8), 1107–1122. doi:0954- 4127/99/081107-16
  • Sullivan, D. (2012). Exploring text with qualitative data analysis: Using a dialogical approach. London, UK: Sage.
  • Vidal, M. (2007). Lean production, worker empowerment, and job satisfaction: A qualitative analysis and critique. Critical Sociology, 33(1–2), 247–278.
  • Vinodh, S., & Chintha, S. K. (2011). Leanness assessment using multi-grade fuzzy approach. International Journal of Production Research, 49(2), 431–445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207540903471494
  • Vinodh, S., & Joy, D. (2012). Structural Equation Modelling of lean manufacturing practices. International Journal of Production Research, 50(6), 1598–1607.
  • Warnecke, H. J., & Hiiser, M. (1995). Lean production. International Journal of Production Economics, 41, 37–43.
  • Wickramasinghe, D., & Wickramasinghe, V. (2011). Perceived organisational support, job involvement and turnover intention in lean production in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 55, 817–830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3099-z
  • Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking - banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. London, UK: Simon & Schuster UK Ltd.
  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York, NY: Rawson Associates.
  • Woodside, A. G. (2010). Case study research: Theory - methods - practice. Bingley,UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research - design and methods. London, UK: Sage.
  • Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from start to finish. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2010). Business research methods. Mason,Ohio: South Western Cengage Learning.
Journal of Economy Culture and Society-Cover
  • ISSN: 2602-2656
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1960
  • Yayıncı: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınevi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation and Comparison of Lean Manufacturing Practices in Britain and France: A Case Study of a Printing Solutions Organisation

Dilek DEMİRBAŞ, Laura HOLLEVILLE, David BENNETT