Bir Politik “Anamnenis” Örneği Olarak Ayasofya’nın İbadete Açılması Meselesi

The Case of Hagia Sophia's Opening to Worship As an Example of Political “Anamnesis”

Hagia Sophia has a history of 1500 years. It has been used as a church for nearly 1000 years and has become a crucial symbol of the power of the Byzantine Empire as well as being a center of worshipping for Christians. The symbolic power of Hagia Sophia, which was used as a mosque for 482 years and was conquered by Ottomans, is important. The conquest of Istanbul has been designated by Prophet Muhammed as a 'heralded victory' or 'chosen destination' and therefore, it has a very different meaning for the Islamic world. It was converted into a museum on November 24, 1934. This decision can be interpreted as neutralizing the space in terms of religion or as an effort to compromise. The issue of whether Hagia Sophia is to be reopened as a mosque or not is discussed from time to time in nationalist-conservative discourse. It has been a monumental place that has important symbolic meanings for different religions and empires throughout history and has caused victories, sadness, joys, losses and collective traumas. These old-world traumas are instrumentalized again in the new world. In this paper, the subject will be discussed in the context of political anamnesis.

___

  • Agoston, G. and Masters, B.A. (2009). Encylopedia of the ottoman empire. New York, NY: Infobase Publishing.
  • Ağırakça, A. (1996). Konstantiniyye fethi hadisinin İslam fetih hareketlerine etkisi ve oluşturduğu motivasyon [The Impact of the Conquest of Constantinople Hadith on the Islamic Conquest Movements and the Motivation It Created]. In I. Uluslararası İstanbul’un fethi sempozyumu [I. International Symposium for the Conquest of Istanbul]. İstanbul, Turkey: Kültür İşleri Daire Başkanlığı.
  • Akgündüz, A., Öztürk, S., Baş, Y. (2015). Üç devirde bir mabed Ayasofya [A Temple, Three Ages: Hagia Sophia]. İstanbul, Turkey: Osmanlı Araştırmaları Vakfı.
  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Arendt, H. (1996). Geçmişle gelecek arasında [Between past and future]. (S. Şener, Trans.). İstanbul, Turkey: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Bakieva, G.A. (2007). Cultural heritage and contemporary change. Series, IIIC. Central Asia, Vol.3, Washington, DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
  • Bardakçı, M. (2018). Kılıç hakkı [Right of conquest]. Haberturk Gazetesi. https://www.haberturk.com/yazarlar/ murat-bardakci/2144986-kilic-hakki
  • Başbakanlık Cumhuriyet Arşivi [The Prime Ministry Republican Archives]. 03013010249796, 26.11.1934.
  • Bilgin, N. (1994). Kimlik sorunu [Identity crisis]. İzmir, Turkey: Ege Yayıncılık.
  • Bilgin, N. (1999). Kollektif kimlik [Collective identity]. İstanbul, Turkey: Sistem Yayıncılık.
  • Curtis, N. (2004). Art and the immemorial. Space & Culture, 7 (3): 302–312.
  • Çevik, A. (2005). Sahnedeki kültürel travma: oyunlarla yaşayanlar [Cultural trauma on stage: oyunlarla yaşayanlar]. Tiyatro Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20: 41–71.
  • Deringil, S. (2014). İktidarın sembolleri ve ideoloji, II. Abdülhamid dönemi (1876-1909) [Symbols of power and ideology, the reign of Abdulhamid II (1876-1909)]. İstanbul, Turkey: Doğan Kitap.
  • Dikici, A. (2006). İbadet dilinin Türkçeleştirilmesi bağlamında Türkçe ezan denemesi ve buna gösterilen tepkiler [The experiment of the Turkish ezan within the context of conversion of the language of the worship into Turkish and the reactions to this experiment]. Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmaları, 5 (10): 77–104.
  • Dukas, M.V. (1956). Bizans tarihi [Byzantine history]. (V. Mırmıroğlu, Trans.). İstanbul, Turkey: İstanbul Matbaası.
  • Eldem, E. (2015). Ayasofya: Kilise, cami, abide, müze, simge [Hagia Sophia: church, mosque, monument, museum, symbol]. Toplumsal Tarih, 254: 76–85.
  • Faulkner, W. (2011). Requiem for a nun. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
  • Göle, N. (2010). Modern mahrem [The Forbidden Modern]. İstanbul, Turkey: Metis Yayınları.
  • Güngör, F. Ş. (2015). An assessment over the constructive role of the memory in the novel of “in search of lost time” of Marcel Proust. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Tarih Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 55(2): 59–74.
  • Hagia Sophia: A Symbol of Christian Europe, or of Muslim Turkey? http://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/europeanamericanrelationship/content/articles/events/2010foufp/participantpapers/Hagia_Sophia_after_1950.pdf
  • https://ayasofyamuzesi.gov.tr/tr/content/tarihce
  • Ismayilov, M. (2015). Cultural trauma and ‘genocide’ rhetoric as an imagination. Turkish Journal of TESAM Academy, 2 (1): 107–125.
  • İnalcık, H. (2017). Osmanlı ve Avrupa; Osmanlı ve Avrupa-Osmanlı Devleti’nin Avrupa tarihindeki yeri [The Ottoman Empire and Europe; The Ottoman Empire and its place in European history]. İstanbul, Turkey: Kronik Kitap.
  • Kısakürek, N. F. (2018). Ayasofya Hitabesi (Kendi Sesinden) [Speech on Hagia Sophia (From his own voice)]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TfMfrVFtbg
  • Kulat, M.A. (2001). İstanbul’un fethini müjdeleyen hadisin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the hadith that heralds the conquest of Istanbul]. Diyanet İlmi Dergi, 37(2): 5–23.
  • Lee, H. W.S. (2014). The Danger of China’s Chosen Trauma. http://www.chinafile.com/reporting-opinion/ viewpoint/danger-chinas-chosen-trauma
  • Mc Mullin, I. (2011). The amnesia of the modern: Arendt on the role of memory, in the constitution of the political. Philosophical Topics, 39(2): 91–116.
  • Neal, A. G. (1998). National trauma and collective memory: Major events in the American century. New York, NY: Routhledge.
  • Ortaylı, I. (2009). Tarih yazıcılık üzerine [On historiography]. Ankara, Turkey: Cedid Neşriyat.
  • Özekmekçi, M.I. (2016). Türk sağında Ayasofya imgesi [Hagia Sophia image in Turkish right-wing]. In İ. Ö. Kerestecioğlu and G. G. Öztan (Ed.) Türk sağı: Mitler fetişler düşman imgeleri [Turkish right-wing: myths, fetishes, enemy images] (pp. 283–307). İstanbul, Turkey: İletişim Yayıncılık.
  • Öztürk, L. (2005). İlk Osmanlı fetihlerinde kiliselerle ilgili uygulamalar [Policies towards churches in the early Ottoman conquests]. Uluslararası İznik Sempozyumu [International İznik symposium]. https://www.academia. edu/19916983/%C4%B0lk_Osmanl%C4%B1_Fetihlerinde_Kiliselerle_%C4%B0lgili_Uygulamalar
  • Randall, W. L. (2014). The stories we are, an essay on self-creation. London, UK: University of Toronto Press.
  • Smith, M.L. (1998). Ionian vision, Greece in Asia minor:1919-1922. London, UK: Hurst Publishers.
  • Suber, D. (2006). Myth, collective trauma, and war in Serbia: a cultural-hermeneutical appraisal. Anthropology Matters, 8(1): 1–9. https://www.anthropologymatters.com/index.php/anth_matters/article/view/74/145
  • Şenlen, S. (2007). Ottoman Turks in the English renaissance period. AÜDTCF Dergisi, 47(1): 131–139.
  • Volkan, V. (1998). Transgenerational transmissions and chosen traumas: An aspect of large group identity, opening adress. XIII International Congress, International Association of Group Psychotherapy. https://www. researchgate.net/publication/247735625_Transgenerational_Transmissions_and_Chosen_Traumas_ An_ Aspect_of _Large-Group_Identity
  • Volkan, V. (1999). Kanbağı; etnik gururdan etnik teröre [Bloodlines: From ethnic pride to ethnic terrorism]. İstanbul, Turkey: Bağlam Yayınları.
  • Volkan, V. (2000). Large group identity and chosen trauma. Psyche, 54(9): 931–953.
  • Volkan, V. (2002). Bosnia Herzegovina: Chosen trauma and its transgenerational Transmission. In Shatzmiller, M. (Ed.) Islam and Bosnia, conflict resolution and foreign policy in mult-ethnic statesQuebec. Montreal, Québec: Mc Gill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Volkan, V., Atabey, N. (2010). Osmanlı’nın yasından Atatürk’ün Türkiye’sine: onarıcı liderlik ve politik psikoloji [From mourning the Ottomans to Atatürk’s Turkey: reparative leadership and political psychology]. Ankara, Turkey: Kripto Yayınları.
  • Yerasimos, S. (1993). Ayasofya [Hagia Sophia]. In Nuri Akbayar et.al. (Ed.), Dünden Bugüne İstanbul Ansiklopedisi [Encyclopedia of Istanbul from past to today]. Volume I. İstanbul, Turkey: Kültür Bakanlığı Tarih Vakfı Yayınları.
  • Yılmaz, S. (2017). Kaybolan anlamı ararken: Arendt’in düşüncesinde öznellik [In pursuit of the meaning: The problem of subjectivity in Arendt’s thought]. Mülkiye Dergisi, 41 (4): 29–53.
  • Zürcher, E. J. (1998). Modernleşen Türkiye’nin tarihi [Turkey: A modern history]. İstanbul, Turkey: İletişim Yayınları.
Journal of Economy Culture and Society-Cover
  • ISSN: 2602-2656
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1960
  • Yayıncı: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınevi