The Evaluation of Patients Admitted due to Minor Head Trauma with Clinical Decision Rules

Aim: We aimed to identify patients admitted to pediatric emergency service due to head trauma using clinical decision-making rules. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study involving who referred to a tertiary university hospital pediatric emergency service due to minor head trauma. Evaluations were made with PECARN, CATCH and CHALICE clinical decision rules. Results: 326 cases were included in the study. 63.5% (207) of the cases were male, and their ages were 52±52 months (min: 1 day - max: 214 months). 61.9% (202) of the cases were admitted due to a fall. 15.3% (49) cases presenting with minör head trauma had a (computize tomography)CT performed. In cases under the age of three months the CT scan rate was 66.6%, while it was 11% in cases over three months. 50% of the cases who had a CT scan satisfied the clinical decision rules. However, two cases who had traumatic brain injury(TBI) in the CT could not be determined with clinical decision rules. There was a statistically significant correlation between the presence of severe mechanism of injury and TBI findings in the CT(p

___

  • 1. Hess EP, Wyatt KD, Kharbanda AB, et al. Effectiveness of the head CT choice decisionaid in parents of children with minör head trauma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial .Trials. 2014;15:253.
  • 2. Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, et al. Risinguse of CT in child visit stothe emergency department in the United States, 1995–2008. Radiology. 2011;259:793–801.
  • 3. Bozan Ö, Aksel G, Kahraman HA, et al. Comparison of PECARN and CATCH clinical decisionrules in children with minör blunt head trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45:849-855.
Journal of Contemporary Medicine-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: Rabia YILMAZ