Ali Özgür Ersoy, Efser Öztaş, Sibel Özler

7075

Evaluation of The Low Risk Pregnant Women Who Gave Birth to Macrosomic Infants

Evaluation of The Low Risk Pregnant Women Who Gave Birth to Macrosomic Infants

ÖZET Amaç: Fetal makrozomi, maternal, fetal ve neonatal sağlığı etkileyen önemli bir faktördür. Çalışmamızın amacı, fetal makrozomiye yol açan maternal faktörleri ve gebelik sonuçlarını irdelemekti. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Üçüncü basamak referans merkezi olan hastanemize miadında doğum için belirgin bir risk faktörü olmadan başvuran, makrozomik bebek doğuran 348 kadın hasta çalışma grubu, makrozomik olmayan bebek doğuran 474 hasta da kontrol grubu olarak araştırmamıza dahil edildi. Gruplar arasında kişisel özellikler, laboratuvar özellikleri ve yenidoğan sağlığı açısından retrospektif olarak karşılaştırma yapıldı. Bulgular: Çalışma grubundaki kadınların, yaşı, gebelik öncesi ve gebelik sonu vücut kitle endeksleri, gebelikte ağırlık artışı, önceki doğum sayısı kontrol grubuna göre belirgin olarak yüksekti. Bebeklerin doğum ağırlıkları, doğumun gerçekleştiği gebelik haftasıyla ve geçmiş doğum sayısı ile anlamlı pozitif korelasyon göstermekteydi. Açlık kan glukozu makrozomik bebek doğuran grupta belirgin yüksekti. Sonuç: Makrozomik bebek doğuran kadınlar, makrozomik doğurmayanlara göre daha ileri yaşta, daha obez, gebelikte daha fazla kilo almış, daha fazla sayıda doğum yapmış ve daha ileri gebelik haftasında doğurmuş kadınlardır. Diyabetik olmayan gebelerde de olsa, açlık glisemi düzeyi arttıkça bebek doğum ağırlığı artmaktadır. Neonatal hipoglisemi, hiperbilirubinemi riskleri ve yenidoğan yoğun bakım ihtiyacı makrozomi ile artmaktadır.   ABSTRACT Objective: Fetal macrosomia is an important entity that effects maternal, fetal and neonatal well-being. Our aim was to investigate the maternal factors which cause fetal macrosomia and to investigate the pregnancy outcomes. Patients and Methods: Three hundred forty-eight low-risk women who attended to our tertiary care institution for delivery and gave birth to a macrosomic infant were recruited as the study group, and 474 low-risk women who gave birth to a non-macrosomic infant were recruited as the control group. Individual, laboratorial characteristics, and neonatal health variables were compared between two groups. Results: Maternal age, prepregnancy and peripartum body mass indices, weight gain during pregnancy and parity values in the study group were more than the control group. Birth weights of the babies correlated significantly with gestational age at birth and parity values. Fasting blood glucose levels of the mothers in the macrosomia group were significantly higher than the control group. Conclusions: Women who gave birth to a macrosomic infant were older, more obese, gained more weight in the pregnancy period, had more parity, delivered at a later gestational age than women who gave birth to a non-macrosomic infant. Birth weight of the baby increases with increasing fasting blood glucose levels, even if the pregnant woman does not have any type of diabetes in pregnancy. The risks of neonatal hypoglycemia and hyperbilirubinemia, and the need for neonatal intensive care unit were more frequent in macrosomic infants.
Keywords:

Birth weight macrosomia, parity, pregnancy outcome,

PDF

___

  • 1. Alberico S, Montico M, Barresi V, Monasta L, Businelli C, Soini V, Erenbourg A, Ronfani L, Maso G; Multicentre Study Group on Mode of Delivery in Friuli Venezia Giulia. The role of gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on the risk of newborn macrosomia: results from a prospective multicentre study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:23.
  • 2. Pasupathy D, McCowan LM, Poston L, Kenny LC, Dekker GA, North RA; SCOPE consortium. Perinatal outcomes in large infants using customised birthweight centiles and conventional measures of high birthweight. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26:543-52.
  • 3. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2004;27(Suppl 1):S5–10.
  • 4. Başer E, Seçkin KD, Erkılınç S, et al. The impact of parity on perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by advanced maternal age. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013;14:205-9.
  • 5. Rockhill K, Dorfman H, Srinath M, Hogue C. The Effects of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index and Gestational Weight Gain on Fetal Macrosomia Among American Indian/Alaska Native Women. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19:2480-91.
  • 6. Mochhoury L, Razine R, Kasouati J, Kabiri M, Barkat A. Body mass index, gestational weight gain, and obstetric complications in Moroccan population. J Pregnancy. 2013;2013:379461.
  • 7. Li Y, Liu QF, Zhang D, et al. Weight gain in pregnancy, maternal age and gestational age in relation to fetal macrosomia. Clin Nutr Res. 2015;4:104- 9.
  • 8. Shi P, Yang W, Yu Q, et al. Overweight, gestational weight gain and elevated fasting plasma glucose and their association with macrosomia in chinese pregnant women. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18:10-5. 9. İnegöl Gümüş İ, Karakurt F, Kargılı A, Öztürk Turhan N, Erkmen Uyar M. Association between prepregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain, and perinatal outcomes. Turk J Med Sci 2010; 40: 365-370. 10. Denguezli W, Faleh R, Fessi A, et al. Risk factors of fetal macrosomia: role of maternal nutrition. Tunis Med. 2009;87:564-8.
  • 11. Topçu HO, Güzel Aİ, Ozgü E, Yıldız Y, Erkaya S, Uygur D. Birth weight for gestational age: a reference study in a tertiary referral hospital in the middle region of Turkey. J Chin Med Assoc. 2014;77:578-82.
  • 12. Morikawa M, Cho K, Yamada T, Yamada T, Sato S, Minakami H. Fetal macrosomia in Japanese women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39:960-5.
  • 13. Nkwabong E, Nzalli Tangho GR. Risk Factors for Macrosomia. See comment in PubMed Commons belowJ Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015;65(4):226-9.
  • 14. Richardson C, Trotman H. Risk factors for the delivery of macrosomic infants at the University Hospital of the West Indies. See comment in PubMed Commons belowAm J Perinatol. 2014;31:927-32.
  • 15. Mohammadbeigi A, Farhadifar F, Soufi Zadeh N, Mohammadsalehi N, Rezaiee M, Aghaei M. Fetal macrosomia: risk factors, maternal, and perinatal outcome. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013;3:546-50.
  • 16. Gaudet L, Wen SW, Walker M. The combined effect of maternal obesity and fetal macrosomia on pregnancy outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36:776-84.
  • 17. Yumru AE, Dinçgez B, Öndeş B, Atalay N. The Relation Between Gender of Babies, Macrosomia and Cesarean Ratio in 11561 Deliveries in Our Clinic. JAREM 2011; 1: 18-20
  • 18. Fuchs F, Bouyer J, Rozenberg P, Senat MV. Adverse maternal outcomes associated with fetal macrosomia: what are the risk factors beyond birthweight? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13: 90.
  • 19. Yildiz Y, Özgü E, Unlu SB, Salman B, Eyi EG. The relationship between third trimester maternal hemoglobin and birth weight/length; results from the tertiary center in Turkey. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:729- 32.
  • 20. Al-Hashem FH. Is it necessary to consider obesity when constructing norms for hemoglobin or when screening for anemia using hemoglobin levels? Saudi Med J. 2007;28: 41-5.
  • 21. Rasmussen S, Bergsjo P, Jacobsen G, Haram K, Bakketeig LS. Haemoglobin and serum ferritin in pregnancy–correlation with smoking and body mass index. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 123: 27– 34.
  • 22. Fay RA, Hughes AO, Farron NT. Platelets in pregnancy: hyperdestruction in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 238-40.
  • 23. Erikçi AA, Muhçu M, Dündar O, Oztürk A. Could mean platelet volume be a predictive marker for gestational diabetes mellitus? See comment in PubMed Commons belowHematology. 2008; 13: 46-8.
  • 24. Pitkin R, Witte D. Platelet and leukocyte counts in pregnancy. JAMA 1979; 242: 2696 .
  • 25. Coban E, Yilmaz A, Sari R. The effect of weight loss on the mean platelet volume in obese patients. Platelets. 2007; 18: 212-6.
  • 26. Tarim E, Cok T. Macrosomia prediction using different maternal and fetal parameters in women with 50 g glucose challenge test between 130 and 140 mg/dl. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011; 284: 1081-5. 27. Biri A, Korucuoglu U, Ozcan P, Aksakal N, Turan O, Himmetoglu O. Effect of different degrees of glucose intolerance on maternal and perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med 2009; 22: 473–478. 28. Opati P, Zheng R, Wang J, Xin Y, Zhao H, Bi D. Comparison of neonatal outcomes in macrosomic infants of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2015 Mar 10. [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.3233/NPM-15814037.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2010
  • Yayıncı: Sağlık Araştırmaları Derneği
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of The Low Risk Pregnant Women Who Gave Birth to Macrosomic Infants

Ali Özgür Ersoy, Efser Öztaş, Sibel Özler

Labile hemoglobin A1c: A factor affecting the estimation of glycated hemoglobin

Kalpana SİNGH, Bhawna MAHAJAN, Shweta SİNGH, Abbas Ali MAHDİ

Geotrichum candidum: A Rare Infection Agent in Urinary System: Case Report and Review of The Literature

Fulya BAYINDIR BİLMAN, Mevliye YETİK

Relationship Between Tetanus Antitoxin Titration Level and Vaccination History

Meltem Işıkgöz Taşbakan, Raika Durusoy, Selma Tosun

Evaluation of Usefulness of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Education on Public Health Physicians

Ahmet Baydın, Latif Duran, Erdinç Şengüldür

Complications of Acute Otitis Media: A Single Center Experience

Cüneyt KUCUR, İsa ÖZBAY, Muhammet Fatih TOPUZ, Onur ERDOĞAN