___

• • Arnold, A., Grobl, I. and Koziol, P. (2015), Marker discipline across bank governance models: Empirical evidence from German depositors, Department of Socio-Economics Working Paper No. 2, University of Hamburg.
• • Aysan, A., Disli, M., Ozturk, H. and Turhan. I. (2013), Are Islamic banks subject to depositor discipline?, Faculty of Economics Working paper No. 871, Ghent University, Belgium.
• • Barajas, A. and Catalan, M. (2011), Market discipline and conflicts on interest between banks and pension funds, International Monetary Fund (IMF) Working paper No. 282.
• • Berger, A. (1991), Market discipline in banking. Proceedings of a Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
• • Berger, A. and Turk-Ariss, R. (2015), Do depositors discipline banks and did government actions during the recent crisis reduce this discipline? An international perspective, Journal of Financial Services Research. Forthcoming.
• • Caprio, G. and Klingebiel, D. (2003), Episodes of systemic and borderline financial crises. Mimeo, World Bank.
• • Cubillas, E., Fonseca, A. and Gonzales, F. (2012), Banking crises and market discipline: International evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, pp. 2285- 2298.
• • Fama, E. (1980), Banking in the theory of finance, Journal of Monetary Economics, 6, pp. 39-57.
• • Hall, S. and Miles, D. (1991), Monitoring bank risk: A market-based approach, in M. Taylor (ed.) Money and Financial Markets, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 244-243.
• • Hwang, Y. and Min, H. (2013), Market discipline of subordinated debt: Empirical evidence from Japanese commercial banks, Journal of Financial Risk Management, 2, pp. 38-42.
• • Imai, M. (2008), Market discipline and deposit insurance reform in Japan. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, pp. 3422-3452.
• • Ioannidou, V. and de Dreu, J. (2010), The impact of explicit deposit insurance on market discipline, Tilburg University Discussion Paper No. 2006-05.
• • Karas, A., Pyle, W. and Schoors, K. (2012), Deposit insurance, banking crises, and market discipline: Evidence from a natural experiment on deposit flows and rates, Journal of Money, Credit and banking, 45, pp. 179-200.
• • Krishnan, C., P. Ritchken and J. Thomson (2013), Monitoring and controlling bank risk: Does risk debt serve any purpose?, Case Western Reserve University Working Paper No. 12, USA.
• • Laeven, L. and Valencia, F. (2013). Systemic banking crises database. IMF Economic Review, 6, p. 225-270.
• • Levine, R. (2004), Finance and growth: theory and evidence, NBER Working Paper No. 10766.
• • Morgam, D. and J. Stiroh (2011), Market discipline of banks: The best test, Journal of Financial Services Research, 20, pp. 195-208.
• • Murata, K. and Hori, M. (2006), Do small depositors exit from bad banks?: Evidence from small financial institutions in Japan, Japan Economic Review, 57, pp. 260-278.
• • Omet, G. and Fayyoumi, N. (2004) Do depositors discipline for risk and reward for cash prizes: The case of the Jordanian banking sector, ERF 11th Annual Conference: Post Conflict Reconstruction, Lebanon.
• • Shin, S., Min, H. and McDonald, J. (2014), The market-discipline effects of subordinated debt: Enhanced US commercial banking-sector efficiency and stability. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 3, pp. 78-95.
• • Sironi, A. (2012), Strengthening banks’ market discipline and levelling the playing field: Are the two compatible?, Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, pp. 1065- 1091.
• • Thiratanapong, N. (2012), Market discipline in banking: Evidence from Thailand during the 1997 crisis, Applied Economics Letters, 14, pp. 559-563.
• • Zhang, Z., Song, W., Sun, X. and Shi, N. (2014), Subordinated debt as instrument of market discipline: Risk sensitivity of sub-debt yield spreads in UK banking, Journal of Business and Economics, 73, pp. 1-21.