Ysegul Guner

FOREIGN OWNERSHIP AND CORPORATE PERFORMANCE IN TURKEY

This study examines the relationship between the degree of foreign ownership and performance of recipient firms and test whether different levels of foreign ownership have different effects on corporate performance, using a balanced panel of 270 Turkish firms over the period of 2008-2012. It is found that there is a positive and statistically significant relationship between foreign ownership and corporate performance. However, there does not exist a significant difference among firms with different degrees of freedom in terms of corporate performance, except for the major foreign capital and wholly foreign capital firms in profitability.

Keywords:

Foreign ownership, Corporate performance Turkey,

PDF

___

• Akimova, I., and G. Schwödiauer. (2004), “Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance and Enterprise Performance: Empirical Results from Ukraine”, International Advances in Economic Research, 10(1), 28-42.
• Aitken, B., and A. Harrison. (1999), “Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela,” The American Economic Review, 89(3), 605-617.
• Aydın, N., M. Sayım, and A. Yalama. (2007), “Foreign Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 11, 103-110
• Azzama, I., J. Fouadb, and D. K. Ghosch. (2013), “Foreign Ownership and Financial Performance: Evidence from Egypt,” International Journal of Business, 18(3).
• Barbosa, N., and H. Louri. (2005), “Corporate Performance: Does Ownership Matter? Comparison of Foreign and Domestic owned Firms in Greece and Portugal”, Review of Industrial Organization, 27, 73-102.
• Blomström, M., and F. Sjöholm. (1999), “Technology Transfers and Spillovers: Does Local Participation with Multinationals Matter?”, European Economic Review, 43, 915-23.
• Bastı, E. and N. Bayyurt. (2008), “Efficiency Performance of Foreign-Owned Firms in Turkey”, Transformation in Business&Economics, Supplement C, Vol. 7.
• Bastı, E., N. Bayyurt, and A. Akın, 2011, “A Comparative Performance Analysis of Foreign and Domestic Manufacturing Companies in Turkey”, European Journal of Economics and Political Studies, (2).
• Chhibber, P.K., and S.K. Majumdar. (1999), “Foreign Ownership and Profitability: Property Rights, Control, and the Performance of firms in Indian Industry,” Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1), 209 - 238.
• Doms, M., and J.B. Jensen. (1995), “Comparing Wages, Skills, and Productivity between Domestically and Foreign-Owned Manufacturing Establishments in the United States,” in Robert E. Baldwin, Robert E. Lipsey, and J. David Richardson (eds.), Geography and Ownership as Bases for Economic Accounting, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Douma S., Rejie G., Rezaul K. (2006), “Foreign and Domestic Ownership, Business Groups, and Firm Performance: Evidence From a Large Emerging Market”Strategic ManagementJournal, 27, 637-657.
• Erdoğan, A. İ. (2011), “Foreign-Owned Firms and Domestically-Owned Firms In Turkey: An Analysis of the Differentiating Characteristics”, Journal of Money, Investment and Banking Issue 19.
• Greenway D., A. Guariglia, and Z. Yu. (2014), “The More the Better? Foreign Ownership and Corporate Performance in China”, The European Journal of Finance, (20): 681-702.
• Karatas, A. (2005), “Performance of Direct Foreign Investments in Turkey”, Ankara: Capital Markets Board of Turkey Publication, No: 185.
• Kimura, F. and K. Kiyota. (2007), “Foreign-Owned versus DomesticallyOwned Firms: Economic Performance in Japan,” Review of Development Economics 11:31-48.
• Taymaz, E. and S. Özler. (2007), “Foreign Ownership, Competition, and Survival Dynamics”, Review of Industrial Organization, (31): 23-42.