THEORETICAL STRUCTURE FOR THE APPLICATION OF STOCK-FLOW MATRIX

Purpose -  In this study, we tried to determine the invesment goods requirements of the secttors. Stock-flow structure of the Turkish Industry analized with the help of realized investment projects.  Methodology – The sectorel investment crisis periods are determined based on the CMAX methodology and the regression analysis is applied to investiga has been used to find out how much goods and services need to build a unit capital. By this way sector by origin has been determined, this capital structure matrix was multiplied with sectorel capital-output ratios to reach stock-flow coefficients of the models. Findings- From the results of this study it is observed that by using the the stok-flow coefficients of the sectors we come to the concisıons that is requared to invest in industry.  Conclusion- Capital coefficients are an important means to find the future location of the industries and the interrelationships of the industries as they show the relation between stock capital and current production. The capital structure matrix is associated with the SUO. This relationship is obtained by multiplying the matrix K, which is the SUO, with the matrix S, the stock-flow coefficient.  

___

  • Alkin, E. (1970). 1951-1971 Dönemi, Yatırım, Tasarruf ve Sermaye Hasıla Oranları. Istanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Journal, 30( 1- 4), Page 466.
  • Aulin-Ahmavaara, P. (2000). Dynamic Input-Output and capital, Thirteenth International Conference in Input-Output Techniques, Macerata Italy.
  • Barna, T. (1954). Alternative Methods of Measuring Capital , Income and Wealth Series VIII, Editors: Raymond, G. - Sounders, G., London, Page 254-256.
  • Bocutoğlu, E. ve Bulut, E. (2015). 2007 Küresel Finansal Krizi: Ana Akım Konjonktür Teorilerimi Avusturyacı Konjonktür Teorisi mi. KTÜ Sosyal Bilgiler Journal, Page 285-309.
  • Bocutoğlu, E. (1987). Bölgesel Girdi-Çıktı Modellerinin Endüstrilerarası Sistemdeki Yeri. İstanbul Üniversitesi, İktisat Fakültesi Journal, Cilt 43, (Prof.Dr. S.F.Ülgener'e Armagan), İstanbul, Page 223.
  • Bulutay, T. (1972). İktisadi Büyüme Modelleri Üzerine Açıklamalar ve Eleştiriler. A.Ü. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Publishing, No 341, Ankara. Page 29.
  • Çetinkaya, A.T. - Türk, E. (2014).Tasarruf ve Yatırımların Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi-Türkiye Örneği. Kara Harp Okulu Journal, Vol. 24.
  • Çınar, Ç. (1963). A Macro Model For the World. State Planning Organization Publishing, Turkey, 338.984.3.02. Ç.45.
  • Derviş, K.- Melo, J.D.-Robinson, S. (1982). General Equilibrıum Models for Development Policy. Cambridge Univwersity Press, Washington D.C. USA.
  • Domar, E.D. (1958). Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth. The American Econimic Rewiev, Vol.48, No.5, Page 1004-1009.
  • DPTMAKROM (2000.). SPO Publishing, No 339.5, Ankara, Page 2.
  • El Sheiks. S. (2011). The Structure and Determinants of Egypt's Nonagricultual Income: A Time Series Investigation. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, Page 380.
  • Gold,B. (1955). Foundations of Productivity Analysis. University of Pittsburg Press, , Page 29.
  • Harrod, R.F. (1939). An Essay in Dynamic Theory. Economic Journal, Published by: Blackwell Publishing for the Royal Economic Society Vol. 49, No.193, Page 14-33.
  • Kepenek, Y. (1977). Türkiye İmalat Sanayinin Üretim Yapısı. ODTÜ, Ankara, Page 56.
  • Kibritçioğlu, A. (1998). İktisadi Büyümenin Belirleyicileri ve Yeni Büyüme Modellerinde Beşeri Sermayenin Yeri. AÜ Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Journal, 53, No 1-4, Page 208.
  • Korum, U. (1963). Input-Output Analizi. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Publishingı, No 164, Ankara, Page 47.
  • Leontief, W. ( 1978). National Income, Economic Structure and Environmental Externalities. Chapter in NBER book The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance, Editor Milton Moss, Page 570.
  • Leontief, W.W. (1953). Studies In the Structure of the American Economy. Oxford University Press, NewYork, Page 53.
  • Levine,R.-Renelt, D. (1992). A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions. American Economic Review, No 82 (4), Page 943.
  • Maraşlıoğu, H. Bahçeci, S. (1995). 1993 Input-Output Tablosu RAS Yönetimi İle Tahmini. SPO, No 339.23.09561 Mar.2, Page 1.
  • Muth, J.F. (1961). Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements. Econometrica, No 29, Page 315.
  • OECD (2009). Manuel, Measuring Capital, Second Edition, Page 129.
  • Okka, O.( 2013). Finansal Yönetim. Nobel Publishing, Ankara, Page 9.
  • Okpigher, S.O. (2015). The Seven Factors of Production. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, Vol.5( 3), Page 217.
  • Ozaki,İ -Shimizu, M. (1984). Technological Change and the Pattern of Economic Development. Proceeding of the Seventh International Conferance on Input-Output Technique, United Nation, Page 256.
  • Ökçün, G. (1997). Türkiye İktisat Kongresi 1923- İzmir Haberler-Belgeler-Yorumlar. SPK Publishing, No 59, 4, Page 209.
  • Polat, M. (1979). Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Sermaye Yapısı Matrisinin Kurulması ve Dinamik Girdi-Çıktı Model Denemesi. DPT, Publishing, No 1676, Ankara, Page 27.
  • Robinson, J. (1956). The Accumulation of Capital. MacMillan Press, London, Page 121.
  • Rodrik, D. (2009). Tek Ekonomi Çok Recete- Küreselleşme, Kurumlar ve Ekonomik Büyüme. Translated Neşenur Domaniç, Efil Publishing, Ankara, Page 46.
  • Rostow, W.W. (1966). İktisadi Gelişmenin Merhaleleri. TBB Yayını, Ankara, Page 4.
  • Samuelson, P.A. (1976). Economics- An Intrductury Analaysis. McGraw-Hill Book Company, NewYork, Page 48-49.
  • Siegel, I.H. (1980). Company Productivity Measurement for Improvement. W.E. Upjohn Instutute for Employment Research, KalamazooMichigan, Page 4.
  • Turhan, M. (1980). Ekonomik Gelişmeler Işığında Bankalarda Örgütsel Yönetim. Beta Publishing, İstanbul, İstanbul, Page 49.
  • Ülgener, S.( 1976). Milli Gelir, İstihdam ve İktisadi Büyüme. Der Publishing, İstanbul, Page 456.
  • Yayın, S.-Uras,N.( 1971). Üçüncü Beş Yıllık kalkınma Planı Döneminin marjinal Sermaye -Üretim İlişkisi. DPT, Ankara, Page 19.