Şükran DOĞRU, Fatih AKKUŞ, Aslı ALTINORDU ATCI

YouTube gebelik döneminde covid 19 aşılaması üzerine etkili mi

Amaç: YouTube® dünya çapında en sık kullanılan sosyal medya platformlarından biridir. Videoların kalitesi, hamile kadınlara doğru bilgi verilmesi ve COVID-19 gibi hayatı tehdit eden hastalıkların teşhisi, tedavisi ve önlenmesi açısından son derece önemlidir. Bu çalışma, hamile kadınların covid-19 aşıları için bilgi kaynağı olarak kullandığı YouTube videolarının içerik ve kalitesini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamıştır. Materyal metod: YouTube'da "hamilelik ve covid aşısı", "covid aşısı gebelikte riskli midir?" gibi anahtar kelime ve ifadelerle arama yapıldı. Toplam 54 İngilizce video analiz edildi. Video kaynakları hastaneler, meslek odaları, hamileler, doktorlar ve haber kanalları olarak 5 gruba ayrıldı. İçeriklerin kalitesi DISCERN, GQS ve bu amaçla geliştirdiğimiz gebelik covid aşı indeksi (CAI) ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Bu videolardan 20'sinin (%37) hastaneler tarafından, 5'inin (9) paylaşıldığını tespit ettik. %) doktorlar tarafından, 5'i (%9) hamile kadınlar tarafından, 22'si (%41) haber programları veya haber programı sunucuları tarafından ve 2'si (%4) tabip odaları tarafından paylaşılmıştır. Ortalama DISCERN skoru 33.2±17 idi. Gebe grup GQS açısından diğer gruplardan anlamlı olarak farklıydı (p=0.048). Gruplar arasında gebelikte covid aşı indeksi açısından anlamlı fark bulunmadı (p= 0,501). Sonuç: Bu çalışma, videoların içeriklerinin takip eden kişiler için acilen tıbbi kılavuza göre düzenlenmesi gerektiğini ortaya koydu.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

aşılama, covid-19, gebelik, youtube

Is youTube effective on covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy

Aim: YouTube® is one of the most frequently used social media platforms worldwide. The quality of the videos is of utmost significance in terms of the accurate information for pregnant women and in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of life-threatening diseases such as COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos that pregnant women make use of as a source of information for covid-19 vaccines. Methods: A search was made on YouTube with the keywords and phrases such as "pregnancy and covid vaccination", "is the covid vaccine risky in pregnancy?". A total of 54 videos in English were analyzed. Video sources were divided into 5 groups as hospitals, professional medical chambers, pregnant women, physicians and news channels. The quality of the contents was evaluated with DISCERN, GQS and the pregnancy covid vaccine index (CVI) we have developed for this purpose.Results: Of these videos, we have detected that 20 (37%) were shared by hospitals, 5 (9%) were shared by physicians, 5 (9%) were shared by pregnant women, 22 (41%) were shared by news programs or news program hosts, and 2 (4%) were shared by medical chambers. The mean DISCERN score was 33.2±17. The pregnant group was significantly different from the other groups in terms of GQS (p=0.048). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of covid vaccination index during pregnancy (p= 0.501).Conclusion: This study revealed that There is an urgent need to regulate the content of videos pursuant to medical guideline.

Keywords:

covid-19 pregnancy, vaccination, , YouTube,

PDF

___

REFERANCES 1. Szmuda T, Rosvall P, Hetzger TV, et al. YouTube as a source of patient information for hydrocephalus: a content-quality and optimization analysis. World neurosurgery. 2020;138:e469-e477.
2. Szmuda T, Ali S, Słoniewski P. Letter to the Editor Regarding" A Quality Analysis of Disk Herniation Videos on YouTube". World neurosurgery. 2019;130:570-572.
3. Chang W-H. A review of vaccine effects on women in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020.
4. Heath PT, Le Doare K, Khalil A. Inclusion of pregnant women in COVID-19 vaccine development. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;20(9):1007-1008.
5. Pettirosso E, Giles M, Cole S, et al. COVID‐19 and pregnancy: a review of clinical characteristics, obstetric outcomes and vertical transmission. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020;60(5):640-659.
6. Masarwa R, Levine H, Gorelik E, et al. Prenatal exposure to acetaminophen and risk for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autistic spectrum disorder: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of cohort studies. American journal of epidemiology. 2018;187(8):1817-1827.
7. Rasmussen SA, Kelley CF, Horton JP, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and pregnancy: what obstetricians need to know. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2021;137(3):408.
8. Graham Jr JM. Update on the gestational effects of maternal hyperthermia. Birth defects research. 2020;112(12):943-952.
9. Chan C, Sounderajah V, Daniels E, et al. The Reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of public health information regarding COVID-19 vaccination: cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 2021;7(7):e29942.
10. Paden CR, Tao Y, Queen K, et al. Rapid, sensitive, full-genome sequencing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Emerging infectious diseases. 2020;26(10):2401.
11. Shimabukuro TT, Kim SY, Myers TR, et al. Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons. The New England journal of medicine. 2021;384(24):2273-2282.
12. Tartof SY, Slezak JM, Fischer H, et al. Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine up to 6 months in a large integrated health system in the USA: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England). 2021;398(10309):1407-1416.
13. Lagan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. Internet use in pregnancy informs women's decision making: a web-based survey. Birth (Berkeley, Calif). 2010;37(2):106-115.
14. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, et al. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health informatics journal. 2015;21(3):173-194.
15. Yuksel B, Cakmak K. Healthcare information on YouTube: Pregnancy and COVID-19. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2020;150(2):189-193.
16. Roberts M, Callahan L, O'Leary C. Social Media: A Path to Health Literacy. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2017;240:464-475.
17. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, et al. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. Journal of medical Internet research. 2013;15(4):e85.
18. Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A. Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review. JMIR medical education. 2018;4(1):e3.