Oral DUZDEMIR

Using Path Coefficient Analysis to Determine the Relationship between Yield and Yield Components of Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

This study was conducted to determine relationship between yield and yield components of 10 dry bean varieties for 2 years. Field trials were carried out under Tokat-Turkey ecological conditions and utilized a randomized complete blocks design with 3 replications. The relationship between total seed yield and plant height, number of pod per plant, number of seed per pod, number of seed per plant, seed yield per plant, 1000 seed weight, and total biological yield were investigated. Significant and positive relationship were found between total seed yield and number of pod per plant (0.594**), seed yield per plant (0.527*), total biological yield (0.877**), number of seed per pod (0.455*), number of seed per plant (0.420*). Negative and non-significant relationships were determined between total seed yield and plant height (-0.234). There was positive but no significant relationship between total seed yield and 1000 seed weight (0.245). According to path analysis results, the most important characteristics determining seed yield in dry bean were total biological yield and number of seed per pod

PDF

___

[1]. Dolekoglu, CO. 2004. Dry bean. AERI/View. (http://www.aeri.org.tr).
[2]. Sehirali, S. 1988. Yemeklik Tane Baklagiller. A.U. Ziraat Fakultesi Yayinlari No: 1089, Ankara.
[3]. Anonymous, 2007. Pulses. (www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id =56)
[4]. Dolekoglu, CO. 2007. Pulses. AERI/View. (http://www.aeri.org.tr).
[5]. Sayili, M, Duzdemir O, Akca H. 2008. Economic and technical analysis of dry bean production (Case of Turkey). Proceedings of 43rd Croatian and 3rd Internatıonal Symposium on Agriculture, 203-206.
[6]. Yucel OD, Anlarsal AE, Yucel C. 2006. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis of yield, and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 30: 183-188.
[7]. Ciftci V, Togay N, Togay Y, Dogan Y. 2004. Determining relationships among yield and some yield components using path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 3(5): 632-635.
[8]. Dixet P, Dubey DK. 1984. Path analysis in lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.). Lens Newsletter, 11: 15-17.
[9]. Guler M, Adak MS, Ulukan H. 2001. Determining relationships among yield and some yield components using path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). European Journal of Agronomy, 14: 161-166.
[10]. Nienhuis J, Singh SP. 1988. Genetics of seed yield and its components in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Middle-American origin: I. General combining ability. Plant Breeding, 101: 143-154.
[11]. Adams MW. 1967. Basis of yield component compensation in crop plant with special reference to the field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Crop Science, 7: 505-510.
[12]. Wasterman DT, Crothers SE. 1977. Plant population effects on the seed yield components of beans. Crop Science, 17: 493-496.
[13]. Ozcelik, H. 1993. Kuru tane olarak tuketilen fasulyelerde islah yonunden onemli morfolojik ve fizyolojik karakterler uzerinde calismalar. A.U. Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, Doktora Tezi, Ankara.
[14]. Bozoglu, H. 1995. Kuru fasulyede (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) bazi tarimsal ozelliklerinin genotip x cevre interaksiyonu ve kalitim derecelerinin belirlenmesi uzerine bir arastirma. O.M.U. Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, Doktora Tezi, Samsun.
[15]. Peksen E, Gulumser A. 2005. Relationships between seed yield and yield components and path analysis in some common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Journal of Faculty of Agriculture of O.M.U., 20(3): 82-87.
[16]. Ciftci YC, Sehirali S. 1984. Fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cesitlerinde degisik ozelliklerin fenotipik ve genotipik farkliliklarinin saptanmasi. A.U. Fen Bilimleri Ens. Yayin No: TB4, Ankara.
[17]. Scully BT, Wallace DH. 1990. Variation in relationship of biomass, growth rate, harvest index, and phenology to yield of common bean. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 115(2): 218-225.
[18]. Anonymous, 1998. Devlet Meteoroloji Isleri Genel Mudurlugu, Tokat Ili Iklim Verileri, Tokat.
[19]. Brohi AR, Aydeniz A. 1991. Gubreler ve Gubreleme. Cumhuriyet Universitesi Ziraat Fakultesi Yayinlari: 10, Ders Kitabi: 3, Tokat.
[20]. Akcin A. 1988. Yemeklik Tane Baklagiller. S.U. Ziraat Fakultesi Yayinlari No: 8, Konya.
[21]. Duzgunes O, Kesici T, Kavuncu O, Gurbuz F. 1987. Arastirma ve Deneme Metotlari. A.U. Ziraat Fak. Yayinlari: 1021, Ders Kitabi No: 295, Ankara.
[22]. Williams WA, Jones MB, Demment MW. 1990. A concise table for path analysis statistics. Agronomy Journal, 82: 1022-1024.
[23]. Yucel, C. 2004. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of seed yield components in the narbon bean (Vicia narbonensis L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 28: 371-376.
[24]. Albayrak S, Tongel O. 2006. Path analysis of yield and yield-related traits of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) under different rainfall conditions. Journal of Faculty of Agriculture of OMU, 21(1): 27-32.
[25]. Ribeiro ND, Júnior LH, Stroschein MRD, Possebon S.B. 2003. Genotype x environment interaction in common bean yield and yield components. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 3(1): 27-34.