Export Competitiveness of Türkiye Agri-food Products in the European Union and The Shanghai Cooperation Markets

Export Competitiveness of Türkiye Agri-food Products in the European Union and The Shanghai Cooperation Markets

The purpose of this study was to investigate the competitive advantage and long-term viability of Türkiye agri-food exports to the European Union (EU) and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) markets. The Lafay index and trade ratios were utilized to investigate comparative and competitive advantage, while the survival function was employed to estimate export competition for the EU and SCO markets. The results indicate that Türkiye has a competitive edge in the export of fruits and vegetables to the EU and SCO states. However, the period of comparative advantage experienced by EU and SCO countries was not similar, nor was the benefit consistent. Despite fluctuations in Türkiye’s international trade balance with SCO members, its foreign trade with EU members has increased. Hence, Türkiye should continue to trade in agri-food with the EU while simultaneously expanding business networks with SCO countries.

___

  • Balassa B (1965). “Trade liberalization and “revealed” comparative advantage”. The Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies 33(3): 99–123.
  • Balassa B. (1977). Revealed comparative advantage revisited. The Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies 45(4): 327–344.
  • Benesova I, Maitah M, Smutka L, Tomsik K & Ishchukova N (2017). Perspectives of the Russian agricultural exports in terms of comparative advantage. Agricultural Economics ‐ Czech 63(7): 318–330.
  • Bojnec S & Fertö I (2009). Agro-food trade competitiveness of Central European and Balkan countries. Food Policy 34(5): 417–425.
  • Cagatay S & Guzel A (2003). Review of agriculture and trade policies in Turkey, BSEC Trade Facilitation Project, FAO TCP/REP/2901.
  • Cleves M A, Gould W W & Gutierrez R G (2010). An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using STATA. Stata Press, College Station, Texas.
  • Erdem T (2020). Competitiveness of dried sector: A case study of World and Turkey. Agricultural Economics ‐ Czech 66(8): 365–372.
  • Bashimov G (2017). Comparative advantage in agro-food products of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 4(3):319–330.
  • Isik N (2016). The analyzing of foreign trade flows between Turkey and Shanghai Cooperation Organization. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies 1(17):151-174. (in Turkish).
  • Kaplan E L & Meier P (1958). Nonparametric estimation from ıncomplete observations. Journal of The American Statistical Association 53(282):457-481.
  • Lafay G (1992). The measurement of revealed comparative advantages. In: Dagenais M G, Plunet, P.-A. (Eds.), International TradeModelling. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 209–236.
  • Liefert W M & Liefert O (2020). Russian agricultural trade and world markets. Russian Journal of Economics 6(1): 56–70.
  • Liu H, Minoru T & Dongsheng S (2009). Changing patterns in comparative advantage for agricultural trade in East Asian countries. China Agricultural Economic Review 1(2):227 – 238.
  • Nakiboglu A, Turan Z & Levent M (2017). The economic performance of Russıa in Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Route Educational and Social Science Journal 4(2):13-32. (in Turkish).
  • Pantucci R & Petersen A (2013). Turkey: abandoning the EU for the SCO? Retrieved in May, 09, 2021 from https://thediplomat.com.
  • Telatar G (2019). The rise of Eurasia option in Turkish foreign policy. The International Journal of Economic and Social Research 3(15): 351-369.
  • TSI (2019). Turkey Foreign Trade Statistics Database. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara. (in Turkish).
  • Yercan M & Isikli E (2009). Domestic resource cost approach for the international competitiveness of Turkish horticultural products. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4(9):864-869.
  • Zaghini A (2003). Trade advantages and specialization dynamics in acceding countries. WorkingPaper No. 249, European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main: 4–15.
Journal of Agricultural Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7580
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Ankara Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The Effect of Cultivar and Stage of Growth on the Fermentation, Aerobic Stability and Nutritive Value of Ensiled Quinoa

İbrahim ERTEKİN, İbrahim ATIŞ, Şaban YILMAZ

Evaluation of Irrigation Experiments with GGE Biplot Method and Economic Analysis of Drip Irrigation System: A Case Study of Peanut Production

İsmail TAS

Current antibiotic sensitivity of Lactococcus garvieae in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farms from Southwestern Turkey

Sabahat Selmin SEZGİN, Mesut YILMAZ, Tülin ARSLAN, Ayşegül KUBİLAY

Probiotic Fermentation and Organic Acid Profile in Milk Based Lactic Beverages Containing Potential Prebiotic Apple Constituents

Tülay ÖZCAN, Lütfiye YILMAZ ERSAN, Arzu AKPINAR BAYİZİT, Berrak DELİKANLI KIYAK, Gökçe KESER, Melike CİNİVİZ, Abdullah BARAT

The Massive Impact of Ram’s Sperm Starvation on the Fertilization and Blastocyst Rates in Terms of Sperm Quality and Capacitation

Saıf AL-HADITHY, Fatin CEDDEN

Assessment of Growth, Metallic Ion Accumulation, and Translocation of Lavandin (Lavandula × intermedia) Plant in Cadmium Stress

Yakup ÇIKILI, Halil SAMET

Evaluation of Image Processing Technique on Quality Properties of Chickpea Seeds (Cicer arietinum L.) Using Machine Learning Algorithms

İhsan Serkan VAROL, Necati ÇETİN, Halil KIRNAK

Effect of Priming on Germination Traits and Antioxidant Enzymes of Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) Seeds with Different Vigor under Drought Stress

Parisa JAHED, Mohammad SEDGHİ, Raouf SEYED SHARİFİ, Omid SOFALİAN

Prevalence, Serotype Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance of Salmonella Among Poultry Meat and Eggs in Turkiye: A Meta-analysis

Gizem ÇUFAOĞLU, Pınar AMBARCIOĞLU, Aşkın Nur DERİNÖZ, Naim Deniz AYAZ

Does Dry or Fresh Bee Bread Contain Clinically Significant, and Antimicrobial Agents Resistant Microorganisms?

Fatma MUTLU SARIGUZEL, Sibel SİLİCİ, Ayşe Nedret KOÇ, Pınar SAĞIROĞLU, Bedia DİNÇ