Kaynağında ayrılmış idrardan magnezyum amonyum fosfat çöktürülmesi

Kaynağında ayrılmış ve ayrı toplanmış insan idrarının tarımsal alanlarda gübre olarak kullanılması son yıllarda önem kazanmıştır. Evsel atıksu içinde hacimsel olarak %1’in altında bulunmasına rağmen, evsel atıksudaki azotun %80’i ve fosforun %60’ı idrardan gelmektedir. İdrarın kaynağında ayrılması ve depolanarak tarımsal alanlara uygulanması yararlı bir sistem gibi görünse de sistemin bir takım zorlukları ve riskleri mevcuttur. Bu çalışmada öncelikle idrar kompozisyonunun depolama süresince değişimi incelenmiş, daha sonra idrarın kaynağında ayrılması, depolanması ve tarımsal alanlara uygulanması sırasında karşılaşılan zorlukları azaltmak için idrardaki $NH_3-N $ ve $PO_4^ {3-}-P$, magnezyum amonyum fosfat hekzahidrat (MAF) formuna dönüştürülmüştür. 4/1 oranında seyrelmiş olan idrardaki $NH_3-N $ molar konsantrasyonu 6 haftalık depolama süresi sonunda 0.009’dan 0.08 mol/l’ye yükselmiştir. pH 9.5 ve 10’da gerçekleştirilen çöktürme reaksiyonlarında idrardaki $NH_3-N$’unun %87’sinin reaksiyonda yer aldığı saptanmıştır. Minimum MAF çözünürlüğünün gerçekleştiği pH olan pH 10.7’de ise $NH_3-N $ geri kazanımı %85.8’e düşmüş, buna karşılık $PO_4^ {3-}-P$ ve Mg’un geri kazanılma yüzdeleri sabit kalmıştır (sırasıyla %99.3 ve %99.7). Ayrıca, reaksiyona giren $NH_3-N $,$PO_4^ {3-}-P$ ve Mg’un başlangıç molar konsantrasyon oranlarının reaksiyon verimini etkilediği, magnezyumun molar konsantrasyonunun diğer reaktanlara kıyasla fazla olması durumunda $NH_3-N $ ve $PO_4^ {3-}-P$ geri kazanımının arttığı saptanmıştır. İdrardaki $NH_3-N $’un başlangıç konsantrasyonunun diğer reaktanlara göre fazla olması durumunda elde edilen çökeltinin MAF açısından daha saf olduğu görülmüştür. Elde edilen tüm katı fazlar kristal MAF olarak tanımlanmıştır.

Precipitation of magnesium ammonium phosphate from source-separated urine

In recent years, utilization of source-separated human urine in agricultural farmlands instead of artificial mineral fertilizers has become a favourite method. Urine contributes about 80% of nitrogen and 60% of phosphorus to household wastewater, although it occupies less than 1% of the wastewater volume. Thus, separating urine from household wastewater and recovering the urinary nutrients can be considered as the most important step towards sustainable water and agriculture concepts. Urine fraction utilized in agriculture for vegetation must be free of faeces. To ensure this criterion, urine and faeces are separated at specially designed toilets. Separation of urine in toilets is also known as source separation. Source separating toilets have two bowls where urine and a small amount of flush water are collected in front part of the bowl and the faeces in the back. After the separation urine and mixture passes flush water passes through a separate pipe system to a holding tank. Urine is collected by trucks and transported to storage tanks. When fertilizing season comes, urine is again transported by trucks and applied directly to farmland after being diluted with water. Source separation and separate collection of human urine is mostly preferred in rural area, because small and simpler treatment units are used. Besides, nutrient discharges are minimized (eutrophication is reduced) and nutrient cycle is almost closed. Water is saved and fresh water which is used for flushing is reduced. Finally, the amount of artificial fertilizers which are used for vegetation is lowered. Although source separation is beneficial, there are some disadvantages and risks regarding with the storage, transportation and application of human urine. Researches which have been performed up to now showed that transforming the urinary nutrients into solid state by certain processes minimize the drawbacks. If urine is processed to obtain a urine based solid fertilizer, urinary ammonia which is unstable in the holding tank is stabilized. The amount of urine which is needed to fertilize a farmland is reduced. Ammonia which loss during application is high if urine is applied to the farmland directly. This loss is much more lower when urine based solid fertilizer is preferred. Besides, the amount of urine which is stored and transported decreases. Due to high pH and high $NH_3-N $ concentration of stored urine, magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate (MAP) precipitation method is selected as the most appropriate processing method for stabilizing the urinary ammonia. MAP is a white crystalline compound having magnesium, nitrogen and phosphorus in equal molar concentrations. Apart from being a well known kidney stone, this compound is also known to form scales in wastewater treatment plants. MAP is a sparingly soluble salt and solubility decreases with increasing pH. Thus, its low solubility in water enables it to be used as a slow release fertilizer. The present study involves the investigation of the unstable ammonia behaviour during the storage period and the precipitation of MAP from 4 times diluted and stored urine. As a first step, the change in $NH_3-N $ concentration during the storage period was recorded. After determining the final $NH_3-N $, $PO_4^ {3-}-P$ and Mg concentrations, MAP precipitation was achieved and optimum process conditions were identified. Each precipitate was identified by X-ray diffraction. FT-IR instrument was used to define the functional groups in each precipitate. According to the results, 6 weeks stored urine contained 0.08 mol/l $NH_3-N $. As the storage period was extended to 14.5 weeks, the $NH_3-N $ concentration reached up to 0.14 mol/l. During this period, pH of urine increased with time and the color of urine got darker. As a result of the pH increase, spontaneous precipitation of MAP and hydroxyapatite $(Ca_5(PO_4)_3OH)$ was observed. 86.7% of urinary $NH_3-N $ was reacted in precipitation reactions where the pH was adjusted as 9.5 and 10 separately. The percentage recovery of $NH_3-N $ decreased to 85.8% at pH 10.7 which was known as the pH of minimum MAP solubility. In contrast, the percentage recovery of $PO_4^ {3-}-P$ and Mg were constant in this pH range. Initial molar concentration ratio of $NH_3-N $, $PO_4^ {3-}-P$ and Mg affected precipitation efficiency. According to the results, the percentage recovery of $NH_3-N $ and $PO_4^ {3-}-P$ increased when the initial molar concentration of Mg was in excess. All the solid phases precipitated from the urine were positively identified as crystalline MAP. Furthermore, all of the precipitates contained $PO_4^ {3-}-P$, $NH_4$, O-H and N-H groups which were all detected in FT-IR analyses.

___

  • Adamsson, M. (2000). Potential use of human urine by greenhouse culturing of microalgae (Scenedesmus acuminatus), zooplankton (Daphnia magna) and tomatoes (Lycopersicon), Ecological Engineering, 16, 243-254.
  • APHA., (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th Ed., Washington D.C.
  • Bán, Z.S. ve Dave, G. (2004). Laboratory studies on recovery of N and P from human urine through struvite crystallisation and zeolite adsorption, Environmental Technology, 25, 111-121.
  • Behrendt, J., Arevalo, E., Gulyas, H., Niederste- Hollenberg, J., Niemiec, A., Zhou, J. ve Otterpohl, R. (2002). Production of value added products from separately collected urine, Water Science and Technology, 46, 341-346.
  • Bouropoulos, N.Ch. ve Koutsoukos, P.G. (2000). Spontaneous precipitation of struvite from aqueous solutions, Journal of Crystal Growth, 213, 381-388.
  • Doyle, J.D.ve Parsons, S.A. (2002). Struvite formation, control and recovery, Water Research, 36, 3925-3940.
  • Grases, F.,Söhnel, O., Vilacampa, A.I. ve March, J.G. (1996). Phosphates precipitating from artificial urine and fine structure of phosphate renal calculi, Clinica Chimica Acta, 244, 45-67.
  • Günther, F. (2000). Wastewater treatment by greywater separation: outline for a biologically based greywater purification plant in Sweden. Ecological Engineering, 15, 139-146.
  • Hedberg, T. (1999). Attitudes to traditional and alternative sustainable sanitary systems. Water Science and Technology, 39, 5, 9-16.
  • Heinonen-Tanski, H. ve Wijk-Sijbesma, V.C. (2005). Human excreta for plant production, Bioresource Technology, 96, 403-411.
  • Hellström, D. ve Kärrman, E. (1997). Exergy analysis and nutrient flows of various sewerage systems, Water Science and Technology, 35, 9, 135-144.
  • Hellström, D., Johansson, E., ve Grennberg, K. (1999). Storage of human urine: acidification as a method to inhibit decomposition of urea, Ecological Engineering, 12, 253-269.
  • Hirasawa, I., Kaneko, S., Kanai, Y., Hosoya, S., Okuyama, K. ve Kamahara, T. (2002). Crystallization phenomena of magnesium ammonium phosphate (MAP) in a fluidized-bed-type crystallizer, Journal of Crystal Growth, 237-239, 2183-2187.
  • Höglund, C., Ashbolt, N.,Stenström, T.A., Svensson L. (2002 a). Viral persistence in source separated human urine, Advances in Environmental Research, 6, 265-275.
  • Höglund, C., Stenström, T.A. ve Ashbolt, N. (2002 b). Microbial risk assessment of source-separated urine used in agriculture, Waste Management Research, 20, 150-161.
  • Höglund, C., Vinnerås, B., Stenström, T.A. ve Jönsson, H. (2000). Variation of chemical and microbial parameters in collection and storage tanks for source separated human urine, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, A35, 8, 1463-1475.
  • Jönsson, H., Stenstrom, T.A., Svensson, J. ve Sundin, A. (1997). Source separated urine- nutrient and heavy metal content, water saving and faecal contamination, Water Science and Technology, 35, 9, 145-152.
  • Larsen, T.A., Peters, I., Alder, A., Eggen, R., Maurer, M. ve Muncke, J. (2001). The toilet for sustainable wastewater management, Environmental Science and Technology, May 1, 193A-193A.
  • Larsen, T.A., Lienert, J., Joss, A., Siegrist, H., 2004. How to avoid pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment, Journal of Biotechnology, 113, 295-304.
  • Li, X.Z., Zhao, Q.L. ve Hao, X.D. (1999). Ammonium removal from landfill leachate by chemical precipitation, Waste Manage-ment, 19, 409-415.
  • Liberti, L., Petruzzelli, D. ve DeFlorio, L. (2001). Rem Nut ion exchange plus struvite precipitation process, Environmental Technology, 22, 1313-1324.
  • Lind, B.B., Ban, Z. ve Bydén, S. (2000). Nutrient recovery from human urine by struvite crystallization with ammonia adsorption on zeolite and wollastonite, Bioresource Technology, 73, 169-174.
  • Lind, B.B., Ban, Z. ve Bydén, S. (2001). Volume reduction and concentration of nutrients in human urine, Ecological Engineering, 16, 561-566.
  • Morse, G.K., Brett, S.W., Guy, J.A., Lester, J.N., 1998. Review:Phosphorus removal and recovery technologies, The Science of the Total Environment, 212, 69-81.
  • Nelson, N.O., Mikkelsen, R.L. ve Hesterberg, D.L. (2003). Struvite precipitation in anaerobic swine lagoon liquid:effect of pH and Mg:P ratio and determination of rate constant, Bioresource Technology, 89, 229-236.
  • Ohlinger, K.N., Young, T.M. ve Schroeder, E.D. (1998). Predicting struvite formation in digestion, Water Research, 32, 12, 3607-3614.
  • Ohlinger, K.N., Young, T.M. ve Schroeder, E.D. (1999). Kinetics effects on preferential struvite accumulation in wastewater, Journal of Environmental Engineering, August, 730-737.
  • Otterpohl R. (2002). Options for alternative types of sewerage and treatment systems directed to improvement of the overall performance, Water Science and Technology, 45, 3, 149-158.
  • Pahl-Wostl C., Schönborn, A., Willi N., Muncke J. ve Larsen T.A. (2003). Inves-tigating consumer attitudes towards the new technology of urine separation, Water Science and Technology, 48, 1, 57-65.
  • Rusu, V.M., How Ng, C., Wilke, M., Tiersch, B., Fratzl, P., Peter, M.G., 2005. Size controlled hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as self-organized organic- inorganic composite materials, Biomaterials, 26, 5414-5426.
  • Stratful, I., Scrimshaw, M.D. ve Lester, J.N. (2001). Conditions influencing the precipitation of magnesium ammonium phosphate, Water Research, 35, 17, 4191-4199.
  • Sundin, K.A., Leeming, R.L. ve Stenström, T.A.B. (1999). Degradation of faecal sterols in urine for assessment of faecal cross-contamination in source separated human urine and urine storage tank sediment, Water Research, 33, 9, 1975-1980.
  • Udert, K., Larsen, T.A. ve Gujer, W. (2003 a). Urea hydrolysis and precipitation dynamics in a urine - collecting system, Water Research, 37, 2571-2582.
  • Udert, K., Larsen, T.A. ve Gujer, W. (2003 b). Estimating the precipitation potential in urine – collecting systems, Water Research, 37, 2667-2677.
  • Udert, K.M., Fux, C., Münster, M., Larsen, T.A., Siegrist, H. Ve Gujer, W. (2003 c). Nitrification and autotrophic denitrification of source separated urine, Water Science and Technology, 48, 1, 119-130.
  • Ueno, Y.ve Fujii, M. (2001). Three years experience of operating and selling recovered struvite from full-scale plant, Environmental Technology, 22, 1373-1381.
  • Vinnerås, B. ve Jönsson, H. (2002). The performance and potential of faecal separation and urine diversion to recycle plant nutrients in household wastewater, Bioresource Technology, 84, 275-282.