YASALAR VE GELENEKLER IŞIĞINDA ARKAİK ve KLASİK DÖNEM YUNAN ve CUMHURİYET DÖNEMİ ROMALI KADINLARIN AİLE HAYATI

Tarihe yön vermiş ve birbirleriyle yüzyıllar boyunca hem sosyal ve siyasal anlamda hem dinsel ve kültürel anlamda birbirleriyle etkileşim halinde yaşamış iki büyük medeniyet olan Eski Yunan ve Roma toplumları arasında benzerlikler olduğu kadar doğal olarak farklılıklar da bulunmaktadır. Bu toplumların karakteristik yapısına ve inanç sistemine, yasalarına ve geleneklerine bağlı olarak kadınların aile ve sosyal hayatlarında, konumlarında ve haklarında da belli özellikler ve unsurlar ortaya çıkmıştır. Romalı kadınlar Yunan kadınlarından kısmen daha özgürce yaşamış olsalar da her iki medeniyette de kadınlar erkeğe oranla kısıtlı hayatlar sürmüştür. ‘Aile’ kavramı kutsal ve devletin temeli sayılırken, ailenin en önemli bireylerinden olan kadınlar, soyun devamını sağlama ve evin gözetimi uğruna birçok haktan mahrum bırakılmıştır. Kendileri yeterli eğitim almadığı halde dindar, ahlâklı ve devlete yararlı bireyler yetiştirmekle mesul tutulmuşlardır. Bu çalışmada Arkaik ve Klasik Dönem Yunan kadınların ve Cumhuriyet Dönemi Romalı kadınların yasalar ve geleneklerdeki yerleri incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla Eski Yunan Arkaik Dönemi’nden Hellenistik Dönem sonuna ve Roma Krallık Dönemi’nden İmparatorluk Dönemi’ne kadarki süreçte bazı önemli arkeolojik ve edebî kaynaklara, yasalara ve geleneklere odaklanılmıştır. 

THE FAMILY LIFE OF ARCHAIC AND CLASSICAL GREEK WOMEN AND ROMAN REPUBLICAN WOMEN IN THE LIGHT OF LAWS AND TRADITIONS

Ancient Greek and Roman societies, two big civilizations which involved mutual interactions with each other from social, political, religious and cultural aspects for centuries, naturally had differences as well as similarities. According to the structures, beliefs, laws and traditions of these societies, some specific characteristic elements emerged in these women’s family and social lives. Even though Roman women lived partially freer than Greek women, in both civilizations women had restricted lives in comparison to men. While the notion of ‘family’ was seen as sacred and the basis of the state, women were deprived of so many rights for the sake of home care and the continuation of their family name. Even though they were not educated enough, they were held responsible for bringing up children as virtuous, religious and efficient individuals for the state. In this paper, the position of Ancient Greek women in Archaic and Classical Period and Roman Women in Rebublic Periodin the light of laws and traditions were analyzed. For this reason, there is a focus on some important archaeological and literary sources, laws and traditions from the Archaic era to the Period of the Empire

___

  • Adcock, Frank Ezra (1945). Women in Roman life and letters. Greece and Rome, Vol. XIV, (40), 1-11.
  • Akalın, Ayşe Gül (2003). Eskiçağda Grek kadınının toplumsal yaşantısı. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, XI (33), Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, 17-47.
  • Allison, Craig Y. (1991, May). (review by): Women and law in Classical Greece by Raphael Sealey. Michigan Law Review, Vol. 89, (6), 1610-1617.
  • Ayiter, Kudret (1963). Roma Hukuku Dersleri: Aile Hukuku.2. bs., Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 179, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  • Berger, Adollf (2004). Encyclopedic dictionary of Roman law. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. New Series-Volume 43, Part 2.(First printed in 1953). Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange Ltd.
  • Blundell, Sue (1995). Women in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.
  • Bonfante, Larissa (1986). (Edited By). Etruscan life and afterlife: A Handbook of Etruscan Studies. Detroit: Wayne University Press.
  • Buckland, William Warwick (1963). A text-book of Roman law: from Augustus to Justinian. 3. bs., New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cambiano, Giuseppe (1996). Mensch werden, şurada: Vernant, J.-P. (Hrsg.): Der Mensch der Griechischen Antike (ss.98-139) Frankfurt: Fischer.
  • Carey, Christopher (1998). The shape of Athenian laws.The Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 48,(1), Cambridge University Press on Behalf of The Classical Association, 93-109.
  • Clauss, Manfred (1983). Sparta: Eine einfuhrung in seine geschichte und zivilisation, C. H. Beck (Beck'sche Elementarbücher), München: Verlag.
  • Dashu, Max (2011). Etruscan Women and Social Structure. 21.01.2018, https://www.academia.edu/9831739/Etruscan_Women_and_Social_Structure.
  • Diakov, Vladimir ve Kovalev, Sergey (2008). İlkçağ Tarihi, Cilt:2- Roma. (Özdemir İnce, Fr.’dan çev.), İstanbul: Yordam Kitap.
  • Dougherty, Carol (1993). The poetics of colonization: From city to text in Archaic Greece.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ehrenberg, Victor (1973). From Solon to Socrates: Greek history and civilization during the sixth and fifth centuries B. C..2. pr. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.
  • Ergene, Ayşegül (1998). Eski Roma'da Kadın (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi Eski Çağ Tarihi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.
  • Erişgin, Özlem Söğütlü (2013). Roma Toplumunda Kadının Konumu. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:4, (2), Ankara, 1-31.
  • Gould, John (1980). Law, custom and myth: Aspects of the social position of women in Classical Athens, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 100 (Centennary Issue), 38-59.
  • Gözlü, Ahmet (2015). Antik Yunan(Hellen)da Koloniler ve Bunların Nitelikleri. Folklor/ Edebiyat, Cilt 21 (Sayı 81), Lefkoşa: Uluslararası Kıbrıs Üniversitesi, 179-190.
  • Graham, Alexander John (2001). Collected papers on Greek olonization. Leiden: Brill.
  • Güven, Diler Tamer (1999). Roma Hukukunda Kadının Mirasçılığı, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt 57 (Sayı 1-2), 225-240.
  • Jones, Lloyd Llewellyn (2003). Aphrodite’s tortoise: The veiled woman ofAncient Greece. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.
  • Kapparis, Konstantinos (2003). Women and family in Athenian law. (ed. by: A. Lanni,), Athenian Law in Its Democratic Context (Center for Hellenic Studies On-Line Discussion Series). 01.11.2017, http://www.stoa.org/projects/demos/women_and_family.pdf.
  • Lape, Susan (2004). The Terentian marriage plot: Reproducing fathers and sons. Ramus,33(1-2), Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 35-52.
  • Lefkowitz, Mary R. (1983). Wives and husbands, Greece&Rome, 2. Series, Vol.30, (1), Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Classical Assosiation, Cambridge, 31-47.
  • Lefkowitz, Mary R. ve Fant, Maureen B. (1992). Women’s life in Greece and Rome.2. ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Lerner, Gerda (1986). The creation of patriarchy; Vol. 1: Women and history. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • MacDowell, Douglas M. (1978). The Law in Classical Athens.London: Thames and Hudson.
  • Mantas, Konstantinos (1999). Marriage in the Roman Imperial Period. Polis. Revista de ideas y formas políticas de la Antigüedad Clásica 1999 (11), 111-134.
  • Melville, Robert Dundonald (1915). A Manual of the principles of Roman law relating to persons, property, and obligations. Edinburgh: W. Green& Son Limited Law Publishers.
  • Papayiannis, Joanna (2012). The gynaikonitis: The (un)gendered Greek house (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Advisors: Shear, Theodore L.; Koortbojian, Michael. Princeton University; Art and Archaeology Department, New Jersey.
  • Paribeni, Roberto (1935). Roma Hukukunda Aile Kurumu. (Şemseddin Talip, İtal. Çev.) İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 1 (1), 79-96.
  • Pomeroy, Sarah B. (1995). Goddesses, whores, wives, and slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity.2. Edition (First Edition: 1975). New York: Schocken Books.
  • Powell, Anton (2001). Athens and Sparta. Constructing Greek political and social history from 478 BC, 2. Edition. (First edition: 1988). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Sealey, Raphael (1990). Women and law in Classical Greece. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
  • Sickinger, James P. (2002). Literacy, orality and legislative procedure in Classical Athens.In Epea and Grammata: Oral and Written Communication in Ancient Greece, ss. 147–69, Edited by: Ian Worthington and John Miles Foley, Leiden/Boston:Brill.
  • Smith, William (1890). (Ed. By) William Smith, William Wayte. G. E. Marindin.A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities.Albemarle Street, London: John Murray.
  • Spielvogel, Jackson J. (2015). Western civilization: Volume A: To 1500, Ninth Edition. (First Published in: 1991), Stamford: Cengage Learning.
  • Thomson, George (1990). Aiskhylos ve Atina. (Mehmet H. Doğan, Çev.), İstanbul: Payel Yayınevi.
  • Üskül Engin, Zeynep Özlem & Karaman, Başak (2006). Roma İmparatorluğu ve Roma hukukunda ailenin toplumsal temelleri, Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, (1), 255-313.