TERÖRLE MÜCADELEDE DEVLETİN GÖZETLEMESİ KARŞISINDA BİREYİN ÖZEL HAYATININ GİZLİLİĞİNİN KORUNMASI HAKKININ KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR DEĞERLENDİRMESİ (BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK VE TÜRKİYE)

Giderek artan terör olaylarının önlenmesi amacıyla Birleşik Krallık ve Türkiye’de, telekomünikasyon yoluyla yapılan iletişimin denetlenmesi, internet bağlantı kayıtlarının saklanması, kamusal alanlara kameraların yerleştirilmesi gibi yaygın bir biçimde gözetleme faaliyetleri yürütülmektedir. Gözetlemenin dayandığı hukuki rejimin, özel hayatın gizliliğinin korunması hakkının normatif alanını sınırlandırırken sunduğu güvencelerin hukuk devleti ilkesine uygun olarak keyfiliği önlemesi ve ölçülü olması gerekmektedir. Bu anlamda gözetleyen kurumları denetleyen mekanizmaların da demokratik ve etkili bir şekilde işletilmesi şarttır. Birleşik Krallık ve Türkiye’de gözetlemenin hukuksal çerçevesinin benzer, farklı ve eksik yönlerinin vurgulanacağı bu çalışma, terörle mücadele ve özel hayatın gizliliğinin korunması arasındaki kırılgan dengeyi sergilemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

terörle mücadele, özel hayatın gizliliği, gözetleme, iletişimin denetlenmesi, mobese

A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT ON THE PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND PRIVACY IN FACE OF COUNTER-TERRORISM RELATED STATE SURVEILLANCE (UNITED KINGDOM AND TURKEY)

The main purpose of conducting widespread surveillance activities such as monitoring communications via telecommunications, retaining internet connection records, and placing cameras in public areas is to prevent increasing terrorist incidents in the United Kingdom and Turkey both. The safeguards for the right to respect for private life which are stipulated by surveillance laws should be proportionate and should prevent arbitrariness in accordance with the rule of law. In this sense, it is essential that the oversight mechanisms for security servies should also be operated in a democratic and effective manner. This study, which will emphasise the similar, different and incomplete aspects of surveillance regimes in the UK and Turkey, aims to present the fragile balance between the fight against terror and the protection of private life.

Keywords:

fight agains terrorism, the right to respect for private life, surveillance, interception of communications,

PDF

___

Akad, Mehmet/Vural Dinçkol, Bihterin/Bulut, Nihat: Genel Kamu Hukuku, 2014.
Alder, John: Constitutional and Administrative Law, 10. bs., London, 2015. Amos, Merris: “The Impact of Human Rights Law on Measures of Mass Surveillance in the United Kingdom”, Surveillance, Counter-Terrorism and Comparative Constitutionalism, Ed. Fergal Davis, Nicola McGarrity and George Williams, New York, 2014, ss. 152-172. Anderson, Paul: “Fighting ‘Terrorism’, Repressing Democracy: Surveillance and Resistance in the UK”, Warwick Law School Legal Studies Research Paper, S.1, 2016, ss. 1-29. Aradau, Claudia/van Munster, Rens: “Governing terrorism through risk: Taking precautions, (un)knowing the future”, European Journal of International Relations, C. 13 No.1, 2007, pp. 89–115. Avrupa Konseyi İnsan Hakları Komiseri (Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights), “Milli İstihbarat Kurumlarının Demokratik ve Etkin Denetimi (Democratic and Effective Oversight of National Security Services)”, Issue Paper, 2015 (Çevrimiçi) https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/ Display DCTMContent?documentId=0900001680487770, 1 Aralık 2016. Bal, İhsan: “Türkiye’de Terörle Mücadele: PKK Örneği”, Dünyadan Örneklerle Terörle Mücadele, Ed., İhsan Bal/Süleyman Özeren, Ankara, 2010, ss. 17-79. Bal, Mehmet Ali: Savaş Stratejilerinde Terör, İstanbul, 2003. Barnett, Brooke/Reynolds, Amy: Terrorism and the Press: An Uneasy Relationship, New York, 2009. Barnett, Hilaire: Constitutional and Administrative Law, 10. bs., London, 2013. Beniger, James: Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society, London, 1986. Birnie, Patricia/Boyle, Alan: International Law And The Environment, New York, 2009 Borgers, Matthias/Sliedregt, Elies van: “The Meaning of the Precautionary Principle for the Assessment of Criminal Measures in the Fight Against Terrorism”, Erasmus Law Review, C.2 S. 2., 2009, ss. 172-195. Bradley, A. W./Ewing, K. D./Knight, C. J. S.: Constitutional and Administrative Law, 16. bs., Harlow, 2015. Bronitt, Simon: “Balancing Security and Liberty: Critical Perspectives on Terrorism Law Reform” Fresh Perspectives on the 'War on Terror', Ed. Miriam Gani, Penelope Mathew, Australia, 2008, ss. 65-83 Brown, Ian: “The feasibility of transatlantic privacy-protective standards for surveillance”, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, C. 22 No: 3, 2014, ss. 23-40. Camus, Albert: Sisifos Söyleni, 33. bs., İstanbul, 2016. Cannataci, Joseph A.: “Özel Raportörün Özel Hayatın Gizliliği Hakkına İlişkin Raporu (Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy)”, A/HRC/31/64, 2016. Caşın, Mesut Hakkı: Uluslararası Terörizm, Ankara, 2008. Chesterman, Simon: “Privacy and Surveillance in the Age of Terror”, Survival, 2010, C. 52, No:5, ss. 31-46. Chomsky, Noam: Terör ne?: terörist kim?: Avrupa, Asya ve Ortadoğu, Ankara, Ütopya, 2000. Clapham, Nicholas: “Surveillance: A Separation of Power?” UK Constitutional Law Blog, (Çevrimiçi) http://ukconstitutionallaw.org, 30 Haziran 2016. Coco, Antonio: “The Crime of Terrorism in Times of Armed Conflict as Interpreted by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in R v. Mohammed Gul” Journal of International Criminal Justice, C. 11 S. 2, 2013, ss.425-440. Dicey, A. V.: Lectures Introductory to a Study of the Law of the Constitution, 2. bs., London, 1885. Dönmezer, Sulhi: “Tedhişçilik Üzerine”, Devir Dergisi, C. 6, 1972. Ergil, Doğu: Türkiye’de Terör ve Şiddet, Ankara, 1980. Fenwick, Helen/Phillipson, Gavin: “Legislative over-breadth, democratic failure and the judicial response: fundamental rights and the UK’s antiterrorist legal policy”, Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy, Ed. Victor V. Ramraj/Michael Hor/Kent Roach, Cambridge, 2005, ss. 455-490. Foucault, Michel: Hapishanenin Doğuşu, Çev. Mehmet Ali Kılıçbay, Ankara, 2006.