The hidden value of water flows: the chemical exergy of rivers

The hydroelectricity potential of rivers is a very well-know parameter used to characterize the availability of a river as a function of its flow and its altitude. However, the chemical potential of water flowing through the rivers is commonly ignored. In its source, water presents high quality and, therefore, it owns an important availability that can be expressed through its chemical exergy value. On the opposite, when it flows into the sea and reaches the thermodynamic equilibrium, it can not be further used and it is converted into a null exergy value. Within these two limit values, the exergy state of the river at its different stages can be assessed. On the other hand, water availability for specific uses depends on its quality.In this way, the almost always hidden value of water, its chemical potential, is highlighted and can be compared to the potential component, since they are expressed in the same units (energy units). In this paper, it is shown that potential and chemical exergy values of rivers rise up with values with the same order of magnitude. That is, the chemical value of a river is, from a thermodynamic perspective, as much as its potential value. The main difference lies in the current available technologies to take advantage of those physical disequilibrium: while hydro-power turbines are a completely proved technology, there are not yet commercial devices to take advantage of the hydro-chemical potential.Results of those estimations for a small Spanish river, the Muga river, are presented in this paper in order to prove the accuracy of the methodology. It is shown that the potential exergy of that river ranges from 2.37 to 7.15 MW, while its chemical exergy is comprised between 2.30 and 8.78 MW for the present state of the river. In addition, several exergy indexes are defined as basic parameters to provide information about the advantage taken from the river, that is, about the water uses within the watershed.

___

  • Botero, E. (2000). Valoración exergética de recursos naturales, minerales, agua y combustibles fósiles. Tesis doctoral. Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica. Universidad de Zaragoza. [In Spanish].
  • Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. (2006). Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science, 281 (1- 2): 70-87.
  • Chen, G.Q. (2006). Scarcity of exergy and ecological evaluation based on embodied exergy. Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 11, pp. 531-552. Elsevier.
  • Chen, G.Q. and Ji, X. (2007). Chemical exergy based evaluation of water quality. Ecological Modelling. Pp. 259-268. Elsevier.
  • CWA, Catalan Water Agency (2004). Recull de dades. Els recursos hidrics en regim natural a les conques internes de catalunya (1940-200). Agéncia Catalana de l´Aigua. Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament de Medi Ambient i Habitatge. [In Catalan].
  • CWA, Catalan Water Agency (2008). Análisi Económica per a la planificació hidrológica. Catalunya: L´experiéncia pilot a la Conca de la Muga.Agéncia Catalana de l´Aigua.Generalitat de Catalunya.
  • Departament de Medi Ambient i Habitatge. [In Catalan].
  • Delli Priscoli, J. (2000). Water and civilization: using history to reframe water policy debates and to build a new ecological realism. Water Policy, 1 (6) pp. 623- 636.
  • Gong, M. and Wall, G. (2001). On exergy and sustainable development, Part-2. Exergy, an International Journal 4, pp. 217-233. Elsevier.
  • IHA, 2008. The contribution of hydropower. Factsheets. International Hydropower Association. Available at: www.hydropower.org Jørgensen, S.E. 2006. Eco - Exergy as Sustainability. WIT Press Southampton, Boston.
  • Le Goff, P. (1979) Énergétique industrielle: Analyse thermodynamique et mechanique des economies d'energie. Paris Technique et documentation. Martínez, A. and Uche, J. (2010). Exergy of organic matter in a water flow, Energy 35 (1), pp. 77-84.
  • Martínez, A. (2009). Exergy costs assessment of water bodies: Physical Hydronomics, Ph.D Dissertation, University of Zaragoza. Spain.
  • Martínez, A; Uche, J; Valero, A. and Valero, Al. (2010). Environmental costs of a river watershed within the European water framework directive: Results from Physical Hydronomics. Energy, 35 (2), pp. 1008- 1016.
  • New Scientist (electronic journal): Available at: http://www.newscientist.com. Last access: October 2011.
  • Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordic Energy Solutions website. Available at: www.nordicenergysolutions.org Last access: October 2011.
  • Szargut,J.; Morris, D.R; and Steward, F.R. (1988). Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical and metallurgical processes. New York: Hemisphere. Valero, A. (1998). Thermoeconomics as a conceptual basis for energy ecological analysis. Proceedings of the 1st International workshop Advances in Energy Studies. Pp. 415-444. SG Editoriali Padova.
  • Valero, A., et al. (2009). Physical Hydronomics: Application of the exergy analysis to the assessment of environmental costs of water bodies. The case of the inland basins of Catalonia. Energy 34 (12), pp. 2101- 2107.
  • Valero, A.; Lozano, M.A. and Muñoz, M. (1986). A general theory of exergy saving, I, II and III. Computed Aided Engineering and Energy Systems: Second Law Analysis and Modelling, AES. Vol 2-3 Vol. 2-3, ASME Book H0341C. New York.
  • Valero, A; Uche, J; Valero, Al; Martínez, A; Naredo, J. and Escriu, J. (2009). The Fundamentals of Physical Hydronomics: a novel approach for physico-chemical water valuation. In “Water, Agriculture, and Sustainable Well-Being” Chapter 5, pp. 97-118. Oxford University Press.
  • Ventura, M.; Ribas, A. and Sauri, D. (2000). Gestión del agua y conflictividad social en la Cuenca del Río Muga. Geographicalia, 38 pp. 55-70. [In Spanish].
  • Wall, G. (1986). Exergy -A useful concept. Physical Resource Theory Group. Chalmers Bibliot. Trick. University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden 3,4 EOLSS Publisher.
  • WEC, World Energy Council (2007). Survey of Energy Resources 2007. World Energy Council.
  • Zaleta-Aguilar, A.; Ranz, L. and Valero, A. (1998). Towards a Unified measure of renewable resources availability: The exergy method applied to the water of a river. Energy Conversion Management, 39 (16- 18): 1911-1917