Studying the influence and dimensions of Competitive Intelligence of Coaches on performance of current Soccer teams of The Iranian Premier League According to Component Balanced Scorecard (BSC)

Studying the influence and dimensions of Competitive Intelligence of Coaches on performance of current Soccer teams of The Iranian Premier League According to Component Balanced Scorecard (BSC)

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of coaches competitive intelligence on the football teams performance in the Iranian Premier League based on the Balanced Scorecard component (BSC).This practical research is a descriptive - correlational study in which population consisted of all head coaches and coaches from 16 Iranian Premier Football teams between1392-1393. Two individual from each team were selected as coach and head coach and the sample of 32 students were selected by census method. Questionnaire, 12 balls Fehy (2007) was used to measure competitive intelligence Coaches variables and ¬ 20 items of the questionnaire Neon (2003) was used to measure team performance. The results showed that the competitive intelligence team football coaches could affect performance and internal team performance will significantly increase. Also the team awareness condition, technical knowledge, Opponents situation awareness, and awareness strategy of the coaches had the greatest impact on team performance. In fact, coaches who having high level of competitive intelligence will use the environmental threats as opportunities for improvement and uses it to enhance team performance.
Keywords:

-,

___

  • Ahiauzu, A. L. (2012). The Nature and Fundamental principle of competency-Based public
  • Administration, A workshop paper on Transformational managerial leadership in competency based public service administration for senior civil servants of Imo state. Nigeria. Ardeshir Cham, A. (2009). Explanation of competitive intelligence capabilities. Journal of Commerce, 5 (9), 115-102.
  • David, F. R. (2000). Strategic Management. Translated by Mohammad Ali Parsaeian and Arabs. Tehran: Office of Cultural Research.
  • Eskandari, K., & Rumi, Z. (2009). Examine the relationship between competitive intelligence managers Small Industries Development. Tehran: Fourth International Conference Management.
  • Fahey, L. (2007). Connecting strategy and competitive intelligence: refocusing intelligence to produce critical strategy inputs, Strategy Leadership, 35(1), 4-12.
  • Huang, H. C. (2009). A balance scorecard perspective ,Exepert system with application,
  • Desining a knowledge-based system for strategic planning, 36(1), 204-218. Javadipourfar, M. (2011). The relationship between competitive intelligence and performance of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Management, 2 (10), 10-26.
  • Jazayeri, S. A. (2008). Assessment of human resource performance. Second edition, Tehran:
  • Office of Cultural Research. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into
  • Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Kazemi, S. M., & Tafresh, M. H. (2008). Integrating the balanced scorecard and Six Sigma case study in Iran polyacryl company. Tehran: Iran Industrial Engineers site.
  • Moshbaki, A., Rezvanian, Z., Mohammad, R., & Khrmgah, S. S. (2011). Assess and improve competitive intelligence at car companies applying QFD. Improved Management, 5 (3), 81
  • Moshbaki Esfehani, A., & Zangoyi Nejad, A. (2008). Structural design of intelligent model- based competitive intelligence - organization. Journal of Business, 13 (49), 171-197.
  • Nadrynsb, M., Ehsani, M., Khabiri, M., Amiri, M., & Ghare Khani, H. (2011). Review the current status of football and soccer, the country's strategic positioning. Sport Management, 9 (1), 28-5.
  • Niven, P. R. (2003). Balanced scorecard step by step for government and nonprofit agencies,
  • New York: John Wiley Sons. Rezayi Dolat Abadi, H., Zeinali, Z., & Shekarchizadeh, Z. (2011). Effect of competitive intelligence to create competitive advantage. Landscape Business Management, 10 (5), 25-9.