Different aspects of melancholy in the museum of innocence

Orhan Pamuk’s The Museum of Innocence offers prevalent examples of melancholy which is based on the pratoganist Kemal’s state of mind. Even before losing the object of desire, Kemal mourns about the future separation which signals the beginning of melancholy that increases after the end of the affair with Füsun and turns into a mood of life that lasts as long as he lives. Attached to the lost object (Füsun) and the gesture of its loss, Kemal yearns to be a part of Füsun’s life. Therein resides the cause of his attachment to the objects that belong to Füsun which he gathers in Merhamet Apartment that already functions as a museum. This paper analyses object attachment and the idea of museum that devoloped from this which direct us to the concept of the “aura” and transmissibility of the past to the future.

Keywords:

Orhan Pamuk, The Museum of Innocence, Melancholy, Collector Loss,

PDF

___

Agamben, G. (1999). The Man Without Content. California: Stanford University Press.
_______. (1993). Stanzas: Word and Phantasm in Western Culture. Minneapolis: Uni-versity of Minnesota Press.
Aristotle. (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle. Vol. II. Ed. J. Barnes. Trans. E.S.Forster. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Benjamin, W (1973). Illuminations. Ed. Hannah Arendt. Trans. Harry Zohn.
London: Fontana Press.
_______. (1977). The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Trans. John Osborne. London:
NLB.
Flatley, J. (2008). Affective Mapping: Melancholia and the Politics of Modernism.
Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London: Harvard University Press.
Freud, S. (2000). ‘Mourning and Melancholia’. The Nature of Melancholy: From
Aristotle to Kristeva. Ed. Jennifer Radden. New York: Oxford University Press, 283-294.
Pamuk, O. (2013). İstanbul: Hatıralar ve Şehir. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
_______. 2008. Masumiyet Müzesi. İstanbul: İletişim.
Sina, İbn-i. (1930). Canon of Medicine. Trans. O. Cameron Gruner. London: Luzac & Co.
Zizek, S. (2000). “Melancholy and the Act”. Critical Inquiry. Vol. 26. No.4, 657-681.