RUSYA’NIN TARİHSEL-EKONOMİK KONUMUNUN RUS KİMLİĞİ VE MİLLİYETÇİLİĞİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Rusya’da ulusal kimliğin şekillenmesinde ekonomik gelişmeler ile politik milliyetçiliğin yan yana gittiği ve birbirlerini etkilediği söylenebilir. Özellikle Sovyetler Birliği’nin dağılmasından sonra Rusya Federasyonu içinde yaşanan ekonomik gelişmelerin Rus ulusal kimliği üzerinde nasıl bir etki yaptığı, cevaplandırılması gereken önemli bir sorudur. Ekonomik ve politik yorumların arasındaki farkın kapatılması ve Rusya’da kapitalizm ve milliyetçilik arasındaki tarihsel ilişkilerin ortaya çıkarılması ise bu çalışmanın temel amacını oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma esasen üç ana döneme ayrılmakta ve yaşananlar bu tarihsel bölümlendirme üzerinden açıklanmaktadır. Bu dönemlerden ilki, Çarlık Rusya’sındaki modernleşme hareketleri ve Rusya’nın kapitalist dünya ekonomisine eklemlenme süreci, ikincisi Sovyetler Birliği ile başlayan sosyalist rejim ve üçüncüsü Rusya Federasyonu dönemidir.

THE IMPACT OF RUSSIA'S HISTORICAL ECONOMIC POSITION ON RUSSIAN IDENTITY AND NATIONALISM

It can be suggested that the formation of Russian national identity is shaped in line with economic developments and political nationalism with intersections where they have influence over one another. One important question to be answered at this point is how the economic developments in Russian Federation following the Dissolution of the Soviet Union affected the national identity of Russia. The main goal of this study is to fill in the gap between economic and political discourses, while revealing the historical connection between capitalism and nationalism in Russia. The study is primarily divided into three main periods and the events are explained based on such chronologies. The first one of these periods comprises modernization movements in Tsarist Russia and Russia's articulation across the global economy; the second one focuses on the socialist regime that began with the Soviet Union; and finally, the third one focuses on the time of Russian Federation.

___

  • Armaoglu, Fahir (1991). 20. Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi (Cilt II: 1980-1990). Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  • Cliff, Tony (1974). State Capitalism in Russia. London: Pluto Press.
  • Falkus M.E. (1972). The Industrialisation of Russia, 1700-1914. London: Palgrave.
  • Fitzpatrick, Sheila (1999). Everyday Stalinism - Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times: Soviet Russia in the 1930s. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gellner, Ernest (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Giddens, Anthony (1981). A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism Vol.1 (Power, Property and the State). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Giner, Salvador (1993). “Religión Civil”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 61, 23-55
  • Gudkov, Lev (2016). “Russia's National Identity Through the Lens of the Kremlin's Foreign Policy” interview by Koshkin, Pavel. Russia Direct. http://www.russia-direct.org/qa/russias-national-identity-through-lens-kremlins-foreign-policy (Date of Access: 01.April.2017)
  • Guibernau, Montserrat (1996). Nationalisms: The Nation-State and Nationalism in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Hansen, Kurt Nesby (1992). “Continuity within Soviet Nationality Policy: Prospects for Change in Post-Soviet Era”, Rezun, Miron (ed.). Nationalism and The Break of an Empire: Russia and Its Periphery, London: Praeger Publishers, 11-25.
  • Hechter, Michael (1975). Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development, 1536-1966. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Hobsbawm, E.J. (1990). Nations and Nationalism since 1870: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hobsbawm, E.J. (1995). The Age of Extremes: 1914-1991. London: Abacus.
  • Kennedy, Paul (1988). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.
  • Kohn, Hans (1953). Pan-Slavism: Its History and Ideology. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Matuzewski, Daniel C. (1989). “Nationalities in the Soviet Future: Trends under Gorbachev”, Lerner, L.W. and
  • Threadgold, D.W. (eds.) Gorbachev and the Soviet Future, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • Minc, Alain (1995). Yeni Ortaçağ. (çev.) Agaogulları, Mehmet Ali, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
  • Nairn, Tom (1981). The Break-Up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-Nationalism. New York: Verso Books.
  • Roy, Olivier (2000). The New Central Asia: The Creation of Nations. London: I.B. Tauris Publishers.
  • Rutland, Peter (2016). “The place of economics in Russian national identity debates”, Kolsto, Pal and Blakkisrud, Helge (eds.). The New Russian Nationalism: Imperialism, Ethnicity and Authoritarianism 2000-15. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press Ltd., 336-361.
  • Smith, Anthony (1983). Theories of Nationalism. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel (1974). The Modern World-System I. New York: Academic Press.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel (1979). The Capitalist World-Economy. London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel (1980). The Modern World-System II. New York: Academic Press.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel (1989). The Modern World-System III. New York: Academic Press.
  • Taheri, Amir (1989). Crescent in a Red Sky: Future of Islam in the Soviet Union. London: Hutchinson.
  • Thom, Francoise (1989). The Gorbachev Phenomenon: A History of Perestroika. (trans.) Marshall, Jenny. London: Continuum International Publishing.
  • Zelnik, Reginald E. (1968). “The Peasant and the Factory”, Vucinich, Wayne (ed.). The Peasant in Nineteenth-Century Russia, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 158-190.