MUTLAK SATINALMA GÜCÜ PARİTESİ HİPOTEZİ’NİN TEST EDİLMESİ: TÜRKİYE VE DIŞ TİCARET ORTAKLARI UYGULAMASI
Bu çalışma Türkiye’nin de aralarında bulunduğu 42 dış ticaret ortağı ülke için 1994:M1-2016:M9 aylık verilerini kullanarak “Mutlak Satınalma Gücü Paritesi-Mutlak SGP Hipotezi” nin geçerliliğini test etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. SGP hipotezi, belli bir mal ve hizmet sepetinin, aynı para birimi cinsinden fiyatının tüm ülkelerde eşit olması gerektiğini iddia etmektedir. Çalışmada, Türkiye ve Türkiye’nin dış ticaret ortakları için SGP hipotezi, birinci nesil panel birim kök testleri, ikinci nesil panel birim kök testleri ve yapısal kırılmaları dikkate alan birim kök testiyle araştırılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgu, incelenen ülkelerden 41 ülke için SGP hipotezinin geçerli olduğudur.
TESTING THE ABSOLUTE PURCHASING POWER PARITY HYPOTHESIS: TURKEY AND FOREIGN TRADE PARTNERS APPLICATION
This study aims to investigate validity of “Absolute Purchasing PowerParity-Absolute PPP” for 42 foreign trade partner countries includingTurkey using monthly data 1994:M1-2016:M9. The PPP state that the priceof a fixed basket o f goods a nd services must be equal in all countries in thesame currency. In this paper the PPP hypothesis has been investigated byfirst generation panel unit root tests, second generation panel unit root testsand panel unit root test with structural breaks for Turkish and Turkishforeign trade partners. The finding is that the PPP hypothesis is valid for the41 countries.
___
- Acaravcı, Songul Kakilli; Acaravcı, Ali (2007a). “Purchasing Power Parity
Under The Current Float”. International Research Journal of Finance and
Economics, 10, 167-174.
- Acaravcı, Songul Kakilli; Acaravcı, Ali (2007b). "Nonstationarity and the Level
Shift for Turkish Real Exchange Rates”. Empirical Economic Letter, 6, 517-523.
- Adıgüzel, Uğur; Sahbaz, Ahmet; Özcan, Ceyhun Can; Nazlıoğlu, Şaban
(2014). “The Behavior of Turkish Exchange Rates: A Panel Data Perspective”.
Economic Modelling, 42, 177-185.
- Akçay, Aslı Önay; Erataş, Filiz (2015). “Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi Teorisinin
Geçerliliği: G7 Örneği”. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1),
81-100.
- Alba, Joseph D .; Park, Donghyun ( 2005). “ An Empirical Investigation of
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) for Turkey”. Journal of Policy Modeling, 27(8),
989-1000.
- Asea, Patrick; Corden, Max W. (1994). “The Balassa‐Samuelson Model: An
Overview”. Review of International Economics, 2(3), 191-200.
- Asteriou, Dimitrios; Hall, Stephen G. (2007). Applied Econometrics: A Modern
Approach Using EViews and Microfit. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bahmani-Oskoee, Mohsen; Brooks, Taggert J. (2006). “The Purchasing Power
Parity Puzzle in Developing Countries”. International Macroeconomics: Recent
Developments, Amalia Morales-Zumaqero (Ed.), New York: Nova Science
Publishers, 53-61.
- Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, (1998). "Do Exchange Rates Follow a Random
Walk Process in Middle Eastern Countries?”. Economics Letters, 58(3), 339-344.
- Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen; Kandıl, Magda (2007). “Testing the PPP in the
Non-Linear STAR Framework: Evidence from MENA Countries”. Scientific
Journal of Administrative Development, 5, 19-33.
- Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen; Chang, Tsangyao; Lee, Kuei-Chiu (2016).
“Purchasing Power Parity in Emerging Markets: A Panel Stationary Test with
Both Sharp and Smooth Breaks”. Economic Systems, 40(3), 453-460.
- Bai, J ushan; N G, S erena ( 2004). “ A Panic Attack on Unit Roots and
Cointegration”. Econometrica, 72.4, 1127-1177.
- Baltagi, Badi, H. (2014). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Chichester: John
Wiley&Sons Ltd.
- Bozoklu, Şeref; Yılancı, Veli (2010). “Reel Döviz Kurlarının Durağanlığı: E7
Ülkeleri için Ampirik Bir İnceleme”. Maliye Dergisi, 158, 587-606.
- Breitung, Jörg (2001). “The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel
Data”. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 161-177.
- Breusch, Trevor Stanley; Pagan, Adrian Rodney; (1980). “The Lagrange
Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics”.
The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
- Clarsson, Mikael; Lyhagen, Johan; Osterholm, Par (2007). “Testing for
Purchasing Power Parity in Cointegrated Panels”. IMF Working Papers,
7287(200), 1-19.
- Cassel, Gustav (1918). “Abnormal Deviations in International Exchanges”. The
Economic Journal, 413-415.
- Choi, In, (2001). “Unit Root Tests for Panel Data”. Journal of International
Money and Finance, 20(2), 249-272.
- Choi, In, (2006). “Combination Unit Root Tests for Cross-Sectionally Correlated
Panels”. Econometric Theory and Practice: Frontiers of Analysis and Applied
Research: Essays in Honor of Peter CB Phillips. Cambridge University Press,
311-333.
- Chowdhury, Muhammad K. (2007). “Belassa-Samuelson Effect Approaching
Fifty Years: Is It Retiring Early in A ustralia?”. University of Wollongong
Economics Working Paper Series, 1-25.
- Çeviş, İsmail; Ceylan, Reşat (2015). “Kırılgan Beşlide Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi
(SAGP) Hipotezinin Test Edilmesi”. Journal of Yaşar University, 10(37), 6381-
6393.
- Doğanlar, Murat; Bal, Harun; Özmen, Mehmet (2009). “Testing Long Run
Validity of Purchasing Power Parity for Selected Emerging Market
Economies”. Applied Economics Letters, 16(14), 1443-1448.
- Doğanlar, Murat; Özmen, Mehmet (2000). “Purchasing Power Parity and Real
Exchange Rates in Case of Developing Countries”. Istanbul Stock Exchange
Review, 4(16), 91-102.
- Erlat, Haluk, (2003). “The Nature of Persistence in Turkish Real Exchange
Rates”. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 39(2), 70-97.
- Erlat, Haluk, (2004). “Unit Roots or Nonlinear Stationarity in Turkish Real
Exchange Rates”. Applied Economics Letters, 11(10), 645-650.
- Erlat, H aluk, ( 2009). “ Persistence in Turkish Real Exchange Rates: Panel
Approaches”. FIW, No. 029.
- EUROSTAT Database, (2017). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
(Erişim Tarihi: 05.04.2017).
- Güloğlu, Bülent; Ispır, Serdar; Okat, Deniz (2011). “Testing the Validity of
Quasi PPP Hypothesis: Evidence from a Recent Panel Unit Root Test with
Structural Breaks”. Applied Economics Letters, 18(18), 1817-1822.
- Hadri, Kaddour (2000). “Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel
Data”. The Econometrics Journal, 3, 148-161.
- Im, Kyung So; Pesaran, M. Hashem; Yongcheol, Shin (2003). “Testing for Unit
Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.
- Im, Kyung So, Lee, Junsoo; Tieslau, Margie (2005). “Panel LM Unit-Root Tests
with Level Shifts”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 393-419.
- Im, Kyung So, Lee, Junsoo; Tieslau, Margie (2010). “Panel LM Unit Root Tests
with Trend Shifts”. FDIC Center for Financial Research Working Paper 2010-1.
- Kalyoncu, Hüseyin (2009). “New Evidence of the Validity of Purchasing
Power Parity from Turkey”. Applied Economics Letters, 16(1), 63-67.
- Kalyoncu, Hüseyin; Kula, Ferit; Aslan, Alper (2010). “The Validity of
Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis in Middle East And Northern Africa
Countries”. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 4(13), 125-131.
- Kasman Saadet; Kasman, Adnan; Ayhan, Duygu (2010). “Testing the
Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis for the New Member and Candidate
Countries of the European Union: Evidence from Lagrange Multiplier Unit
Root Tests with Structural Breaks”. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 46(2),
53-65.
- Kocakale, Yahya; Toprak, Hakan Hüsnü (2015). “Türkiye’nin Reel Efektif
Döviz Kuru Endekslerinin Güncellenmesi”. No. 1506: Research and Monetary
Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
- Korap, H. Levent; Aslan, Özgür (2010). “Re-Examination of the Long-Run
Purchasing Power Parity: Further Evidence from Turkey”. Applied Economics,
42(27), 3559-3564.
- Krugman, Paul R.; Obstfeld, Maurice (2003). International Economics Theory and
Policy. Boston: Pearson Education.
- Lau, C hi Keung Marco (2009). “A More Powerful Panel Unit Root Test with
an Application to PPP”. Applied Economics Letters, 16(1), 75-80.
- Levin, Andrew; Lin, Chien-Fu; Chu, Chia-Shang James (2002). “Unit Root
Tests i n P anel D ata: A symptotic a nd F inite-Sample Properties”. Journal of
Econometrics, 108, 1-24.
- Lopcu, Kenan; Burgaç, Almila; Dülger, Fikret (2012). “Balassa Samuelson
Hipotezi: Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Bir Sınama”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal
Bilimler Dergisi, 12(4), 1-22.
- Maddala, Gangadharrao S.; Shaowen, Wu, (1999). “A Comparative Study of
Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test”. Oxford Bulletin of
Economics And Statistics, 61, 631-652.
- Mankiw, Gregory N. (2008). Principles of Economics. Canada: South-Western.
Mladenovic, Zorica; Josifidis, Kosta; Srdıc, Slaðana (2013). “The Purchasing
Power Parity in Emerging Europe: Empirical Results Based on Two-Break
Analysis”. Panoeconomicus, 60(2), 179-202.
- Moon, Hyungsik Roger; Perron, Benoit (2004). “Testing for a Unit Root in
Panels with Dynamic Factors”. Journal of Econometrics, 122(1), 81-126.
- Özdemir, Zeynel Abidin (2008). “The Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis in
Turkey: Evidence From Nonlinear STAR Error Correction Models”. Applied
Economics Letters, 15(4), 307-311.
- Perron, Pierre (1989). “The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, and The Unit
Root Hypothesis”. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1361-1401.
- Pesaran, M. Hashem (2004). “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section
Dependence in Panels”. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion
Paper No. 1240, 1-39.
- Pesaran, M. Hashem (2007). “A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of
Cross-Section Dependence”. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
- Pesaran, M. Hashem; Ullah, Aman; Yamagata, Takashi (2008). “A Bias‐
Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross‐Section Independence”. The Econometrics
Journal, 11(1), 105-127.
- Pugel, Thomas A. (2004). International Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill,
Inc.
- Salvatore, Dominick (1999). Internatioal Economics. New York: John Willey &
Sons.
- Seyidoğlu, Halil (2009). Uluslararası İktisat. İstanbul: Gizem Can Yayınları.
- Tastan, Hüseyin (2005). “Do Real Exchange Rates Contain a Unit Root?
Evidence from Turkish Data”. Applied Economics, 37(17), 2037-2053.
- Tatoğlu, Ferda Yerdelen (2009). “Reel Efektif Döviz Kurunun Durağanlığının
Yapısal Kırılmalı Panel Birim Kök Testleri Kullanılarak Sınanması”. Doğuş
Üniversitesi Dergisi, 10(2), 310-323.
- Tatoğlu, Ferda Yerdelen (2013). İleri Panel Veri Analizi. İstanbul: Beta Basım.
- Uçan, Okyay (2012). “Açık Ekonomilerde Döviz Kuru Dinamikleri: Türkiye
Örneği”, (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal
Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana.
- Ünsal, Erdal M. (2005). Uluslararası İktisat Teori, Politika ve Açık Ekonomi Makro
İktisadı. Ankara: İmaj Yayıncılık.
- Yazgan, M. Ege (2003). “The Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis for a High
Inflation Country: A Re-Examination of the Case of Turkey”. Applied
Economics Letters, 10(3), 143-147.
- Žďárek, Václav (2012). “An Empirical Investigation of the Purchasing Power
Parity Hypothesis in European Transition Countries”. Prague Economic Papers,
21(3), 257-276.
- Zıvot, Eric; Andrews, Donald W. K. ( 1992). “ Further E vidence o n t he Great
Crash, The Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis”. Journal of Business
& Economic Statistics, 20(1), 25-44.