How the Social Construction of “Child Abuse” Affect Immigrant Parents: Policy Changes That Protect Children and Families

How the Social Construction of “Child Abuse” Affect Immigrant Parents: Policy Changes That Protect Children and Families

Immigrants who move to the United States often face the challenge of interpreting new laws and social norms (e.g., parenting norms), which may vary greatly from their native culture. Acceptable parenting practices are socially constructed beliefs, rooted in cultural context. What is acceptable in one culture may be labeled as child abuse in another. Thus, immigrant parents are at risk for having their parenting practices defined as child abuse by mainstream culture. Defining child abuse in a multicultural society is difficult. In the court system, a cultural defense brings culture into the courtroom, questioning the intent in “abusive” cultural parenting practices. This article offers suggestions that alter the response of social services and the legal system to abuse cases involving immigrant families. These changes to policy and education have potential to protect immigrant parents and families.

___

  • Behl, L. E., Crouch, J. L., May, P. F., Valente, A. L., & Conyngham, H. A. (2001). Ethnicity in child maltreatment research: A content analysis. Child Maltreatment, 6, 147.
  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company.
  • Brelvi, F. S. (1997). “News of the weird”: Specious normativity and the problem of the cultural defense. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 28, 657-683.
  • Carlson, K. P. (2004). Child abuse or parent abuse? Pediatrics, 113, 181-182.
  • Child Welfare League of America (2004). Children of color 2004. Retrieved October 29, , from http://www.ndas.cwla.org/research_info/minority_child/.
  • Child Welfare League of America (2004). CWLA fact sheet and relevant research. Retrieved October 29, 2007, from http://www.ndas.cwla.org/research_info/specialtopic1a.asp.
  • Critto, A. (1999). Choosing models of society and social norms: Improving choices and quality of life. Maryland: University Press of America.
  • Earner, I. (2007). Immigrant families and public child welfare: Barriers to services and approaches for change. Child Welfare, 86, 63-91.
  • Edgerton, R. B. (2000). Traditional beliefs and practices: Are some better than others? In L. E. Harrison & S. P. Huntington (Eds.), Culture matters: How values shape human progress (pp. 126-140). New York: Basic Books.
  • Fontes, L. A. (2005). Child abuse and culture: Working with diverse families. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Futterman, M. (2003). Seeking a standard: Reconciling child abuse and condoned child rearing practices among different cultures. University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 34, 491-514.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551-575.
  • Hoeffel, J. C. (2006). Deconstructing the cultural evidence debate. University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy, 17, 303-345.
  • Hughes, T. (2006). The neglect of children and culture: Responding to child maltreatment with cultural competence and a review of child abuse and culture: Working with diverse families. Family Court Review, 44, 501-507.
  • Johnson, O. R. (1981). The socioeconomic context of child abuse and neglect in native South America. In J. E. Korbin (Ed.), Child abuse & neglect: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 56-70). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Korbin, J. E. (Ed.). (1981). Child abuse & neglect: Cross-cultural perspectives. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • LaCayo, R. (1993). The “cultural” defense. TIME. Retrieved October 26, 2007, from, http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,979741,00.html?iid=chix- sphere.
  • LeVine, S., & LeVine, R. (1981). Child abuse and neglect in Sub-Sahara Africa. In J. E.
  • Korbin (Ed.), Child abuse & neglect: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 35-55). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Levine, K. L. (2003). Negotiating the boundaries of crime and culture: A sociolegal perspective on cultural defense strategies. Law and Social Inquiry, 28, 39-86.
  • Lincroft, Y., Borelli, K., & Velásquez, R. (Eds.). (2007). Proceedings from Annie E. Casey Foundation, Family to Family: Immigration and child welfare leadership forum and videoconference: A leaders of color series. San Francisco, CA.
  • Littlewood, P. C. (1997). Domestic child abuse under the U.N. Convention of the rights of the child: Implications for children’s rights in four Asian countries. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, 6, 411-448.
  • Lyman, J. (1986). Cultural defense: Viable doctrine or wishful thinking? Criminal Justice Journal, 9, 87-117.
  • Maguigan, H. (1995). Cultural evidence and male violence: Are feminists and multiculturalist reformers on a collision course in criminal courts? New York University Law Review, 70, 36-97.
  • May, K. M. (1998). Family counseling: Cultural sensitivity, relativism, and the cultural defense. The Family Journal, 6, 296-299.
  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Emotions and social norms. In L. P. Nucci, G. B. Saxe & E. Turiel (Eds.), Culture, thought, and development (pp. 41-63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Park, R. E. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. The American Journal of Sociology, 33, 881-893.
  • Peddle, N., Wang, C. T., Diaz, J., & Reid, R. (2002). Current trends in child abuse: Prevention and fatalities: The 2000 fifty state survey.
  • People v. Kimura, No. A-091133, L.A. Super. Ct. (C.A. 1985).
  • People v. Wu, 286 Cal.Rptr. 868 (C.A. 1991).
  • Public Health Agency of Canada (2001). A Booklet for Service Providers Who Work with Immigrant Families. Ontario: National Clearinghouse on Family Violence.
  • Sellin, T. (1938). Culture conflict and crime. New York: Social Science Research Council. State v. Kargar, 679 A.2d 81 (M.E. 1996).
  • Taylor, T. (1997). The cultural defense and its irrelevancy in child protection law. Boston College Third World Law Journal, 17, 331-364.
  • Terhune, C. (1997). Cultural and religious defenses to child abuse and neglect. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 14, 152-192.
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2007). U.S. Legal Permanent Residents: Annual Flow Report. Washington D.C.
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2007). Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant population residing in the United States: January 2006. Annual Flow Report. Washington D.C.
  • Wanderer, N. A., & Connors, C. R. (1999). Culture and crime: Kargar and the existing framework for a cultural defense. Buffalo Law Review, 47, 829-873.
  • Weller, S., Martin, J. A., & Lederach, J. P. (2001). Fostering culturally responsive courts. Family Court Review, 39, 185-201.
  • Wu, M. W. C. (2003). Culture is no defense for infanticide. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 11, 975-1022.
  • Zhao, Y. (May 29, 2002). Cultural divide over parental discipline. The New York Times. Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html.