Mark EULER, Jan FREESE

5013

A New Perspective to Integrate Different Social Capital Concepts

A New Perspective to Integrate Different Social Capital Concepts

The debate about ‘social capital’ is presented in brief. It is assumed that the discussion about it reissues the since the Enlightenment existing debate about the relation between individual and society. In this debate two lines of argumentation can be identified. On the one hand, a rather individualistic concept exists which sees social capital as an individual resource; and on the other hand, a rather collective understanding which sees social capital as pan-social phenomenon. The main goal of this article is to offer a new perspective that makes the integration of these two paradigms possible. Therefore new insights from the field of analytic philosophy are used to modify the concepts of social capital, focussing on the individualistic direction and in particular on Becker’s human capital theory. The resulting new perspective turns social capital into the core social category and is also calling for a new understanding of economics and management.
Keywords:

Social capital, Becker, homo oeconomicus identity capital, strategic interaction management.,

PDF

___

  • Abel, G. (1995). Interpretationswelten: Gegenwartsphilosophie jenseits von Essentialismus und Relativismus. Frankfurt a.M.
  • Adler, P.S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review 27(1), 17-40.
  • Aldrich, H., & Reese, P. R. (1993). Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In Churchill, N.C., Birley, S., Doutriaux, J., Gatewood, E.J., Hoy, F.S., & Wetzel jr., W.E. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 325-339). Wellesley MA.
  • Aldrich, H., Rosen, B., & Woodward, W. (1987). The impact of social networks on business foundings and profit: A longitudinal study. In Churchill, N.C., Hornaday, J.A., Kirchhoff, B.A., Krasner, O.J., & Vesper, K.H. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 154-168). Wellesley MA.
  • Akerlof, G.A. (1970). The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
  • Akerlof, G.A., & Kranton, R.E. (2005). Identity and the economics of organizations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 9–32.
  • Apinunmahakul, A. (2007). Social networks and the returns from labour market. NIDA Economic Review, 2(1), 10-26.
  • Astone, N.M., Nathanson, C.A., Schoen, R., & Kim, Y.L. (1999). Family demography, social theory and investment in social capital. Population and Development Review, (1), 1-31.
  • Baum, J., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Do not go it alone: alliance network composition and start-ups' performance in canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 267-294.
  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (Eds.). (1994). Riskante Freiheiten. Frankfurt a.M.
  • Becker, G.S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 9-49.
  • Becker, G.S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behaviour. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 385-409.
  • Becker, G. S. (1996). Accounting for Tastes. Cambridge MA.
  • Becker, G.S., & Murphy, K.M. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96, 675-700.
  • Becker, G.S., & Murphy, K.M. (1993). A simple theory of advertising as a good or bad. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(4), 941–964.
  • Becker, G.S., & Murphy, K.M. (1996). Die Familie und der Staat. In I. Pies (Ed.), Familie, Gesellschaft und Politik - die ökonomische Perspektive (pp.197-226). Tübingen.
  • Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2004). Incentives and prosocial behaviour. CEPR Discussion Paper, 4633
  • Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the enterpreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 107-117.
  • Blecker, T. (2000). Optimale Interaktionen in Kooperationen – Grundlagen, Erfolgsfaktoren und Gestaltungsempfehlungen. Nase Gospodarstvo (Our Economy), (1), 19-36.
  • Bohnen, A. (1975). Individualismus und Gesellschaftstheorie. Tübingen.
  • Bosma, N., van Praag, M., Thurik, R., & de Witt, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of start-ups. Small Business Economics, 23, 227-236.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1983). Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In R. Kreckel (Ed.), Soziale Ungleichheiten. Soziale Welt Sonderband 2 (pp.183-198). Göttingen.
  • Brandt, M. (2006). Soziale Kontakte als Weg aus der Erwerbslosigkeit. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 58(3), 468-488.
  • Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small Business Economics, 10, 213-225.
  • Burt, R.S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
  • Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge MA.
  • Cooper, A., Folta, T., & Woo, C. Y. (1991). Information acquisition and performance by start-up firms. In Churchill, N.C., Bygrave, W.D., Covin, J.G., Sexton, D.L., Slevin, D.P., Vesper, K.H., & Wetzel jr., W.E. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp.276-290), Babson Park MA.
  • Coté, J.E., & Levine, C.G. (2002). Identity formation, agency, and culture: a social psychological synthesis. New Jersey.
  • Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the form. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
  • Dahrendorf, R. (1973). Homo Sociologicus: ein Versuch zur Geschichte, Bedeutung und Kritik der sozialen Rolle. Opladen.
  • Dasgupta, P, & Seralgedin, I, (Eds.). (2000). Social capital: A multifaceted perspective. Washington DC.
  • Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301-331.
  • Diekmann, A. (1993). Sozialkapital und das Kooperationsverhalten in sozialen Dilemmata. Analyse und Kritik, 15, 22-35.
  • Dumont, L. (1991). Individualismus. Zur Ideologie der Moderne. Frankfurt a.M., New York.
  • Durkheim, E. (1976). Die Regeln der soziologischen Methode (5th ed.). Darmstadt.
  • Durlag, S.N. (2002). On the empirics of social capital. The Economic Journal, 112, 459–
  • Elfring, T., & Hulsink, W. (2003). Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high- technology firms. Small Business Economics, 21, 409-422.
  • Erickson, B.H. (2001). Good networks and good jobs: The value of social capital to employers and employees. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R.S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital. Theory and research (pp.127-158). New York.
  • Etzioni, A. (1997). The new golden rule. Community and morality in a democratic society. New York.
  • Euler, M. (2006a). Soziales Kapital – ein Brückenschlag zwischen Individuum und Gesellschaft. Oldenburg.
  • Euler, M. (2006b). Zusammen unterscheiden- Europa, Logik des Interpretierens und der Dialog der Kulturen. Oldenburger Universitätsreden. Oldenburg.
  • Euler, M. (2007). Networking. Ein Praxis-Leitfaden für erfolgreiches Interaktions- und Netzwerkmanagement. Oldenburg.
  • Feldman, T.R., & Assaf, S. (1999). Social capital: Conceptual frameworks and empirical evidence. An annotated bibliography. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper,
  • Francis, E.K. (1965). Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen soziologischen Denkens. Bern.
  • Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach. Boston.
  • Freese, J. (2007). Ökonomische Beiträge zur Erschließung menschlichen Verhaltens für die Lösung von Naturschutzfragen. Kapitel 1: Bausteine einer rationalen ökonomischen Rekonstruktion sozialer Interaktionen Dissertation am der Fakultät für Agrarwissenschaften, Lehrstuhl Umwelt und Ressourcenökonomik. Göttingen.
  • Freese, J., Euler, M., & Marggraf, R. (2008). Perspektiven einer rationalen ökonomischen Rekonstruktion sozialer Interaktionen als Basis des Sozialkapitalkonzepts. In W. Matiaske, & G. Grözinger (Eds.), Sozialkapital – eine (un)bequeme Kategorie. Jahrbuch Ökonomie und Gesellschaft. Band 20 (pp.79-109). Marburg.
  • Freudenthal, G. (1982). Atom und Individuum im Zeitalter Newtons. Zur Genese der mechanistischen Natur- und Sozialphilosophie. Frankfurt a.M.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York.
  • Gemünden, H.G., & Walter, A. (1995). Der Beziehungspromotor – Schlüsselperson für inter-organisationale Innovationsprozesse. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 65(9), 986.
  • Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D., & Sacredot, B. (2000). The economic approach to social capital. NBER Working Paper, w7728
  • Habisch, A. (1998). Extending capital theory - gesellschaftspolitische Implikationen eines theoretischen Forschungsprogramms. In I. Pies, & M. Leschke (Eds.), Gary Beckers ökonomischer Imperialismus (pp.31-50) Tübingen.
  • Håkansson, H. (Ed.) (1987). Industrial technological development: A network approach. London.
  • Hanifan, L.J. (1920). The community center. Boston.
  • Hansen, E. L. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Summer, 7-19.
  • Hannerz, U. (1969). Soulside: inquiries into ghetto culture and community. New York.
  • Haug, S. (1997). Soziales Kapital. Ein kritischer Überblick über den aktuellen Forschungsstand. Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung. Arbeitspapiere Arbeitsbereich II/ 15. Mannheim.
  • Isham, J., Kelly, T., & Ramaswamy, S. (2002). Social capital and economic development: well being in developing countries. Cheltenham, Northampton MA.
  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The life and death of great american cities. New York.
  • Jansen, D. (2001). Soziales Kapital von Unternehmensgründern. Theoretische Überlegungen und erste empirische Ergebnisse. Retrieved September 9, 2009 from http://www.foev- speyer.de/Survival/ppt/sozkap.pdf
  • Jokisch, R. (1996). Logik der Distinktion. Zur Protologik einer Theorie der Gesellschaft. Opladen.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
  • Kappelhoff, P. (1995). Soziale Interaktion als Tausch: Tauschhandlung, Tauschbeziehung, Tauschsystem, Tauschmoralität. Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften, 6, 13 and 57-67.
  • Kirchgässner, G. (2008). Homo oeconomicus: the economic model of individual behavior and its applications in economics and other social sciences. New York, London.
  • Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15, 1-26.
  • Lichter, M.I. (1998). Message posted May 20, 1998 to http://www.heinz.cmu.edu/project/INSNA/arc_soc/capital.html.
  • Also available at http://www.analytictech.com/borgatti/socnet_social_capital_discussion.htm
  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital. A theory of social structure and action. New York.
  • Lindenberg, S. (1985). An assessment of the new political economy for the social sciences and for sociology in particular. Sociological Theory, 3, 99-114.
  • Loury, G. (1977). A dynamic theory of racial income differences. In P.A. Wallace, & A. Le Mund (Eds.), Women, minorities and employement discrimination (pp.153-188). Lexington MA.
  • Luhmann, N. (1989). Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus zur Reduktion sozialer Komplexität (3th ed). Stuttgart.
  • Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society (ed. by Ch. Morris). Chicago.
  • Meckling, W.H. (1976). Values and the choice of the individual in the social sciences. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 112, 545-560.
  • Meyerson, E.M. (1994). Human capital, social capital and compensation: The relative contribution of social contacts to manager’s incomes. Acta Sociologica, 37, 383-399.
  • Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T.K. (2001). A social science perspective on social capital: social capital and collective action. A report commissioned by the Enquete Commision of the German Federal Government “Zukunft des bürgerschaftlichen Engagements”. KDrs. No. 14/107. Bloomington IN.
  • Pages, E.R., & Garmise, S. (2003). The power of entrepreneurial networking. Economic Development Journal, 2(3), 20-30.
  • Pareto, V. (1906). Manuale d’economia politica. Mailand.
  • Parsons, T. (1951). Some fundamental categories of the theory of action. In T. Parsons (Ed.), Toward a general theory of action (pp.3-27). Cambridge.
  • Parsons, T. (1961). The point of view of the author. In M. Black (Ed.), The social theories of Talcott Parsons (pp. 311-363). Englewood Cliffs New Jersey.
  • Persky, J. (1995). Retrospectives: The ethology of homo economicus. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 221-231.
  • Polanyi, K. (1977). The great transformation: politische und ökonomische Ursprünge von Gesellschaften und Wirtschaftssystemen. Wien.
  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
  • Preisendörfer, P. (1995). Vertrauen als soziologische Kategorie. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer entscheidungstheoretischen Fundierung des Vertrauenskonzepts. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 24(8), .263-272.
  • Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern italy. Princeton
  • Putnam, R.D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in america. Political Science & Politics, Dezember, 664-683.
  • Schmidt, S.J. (2003). Geschichten und Diskurse. Abschied vom Konstruktivismus. Reinbek bei Hamburg.
  • Schultz, T.W. (1973). The value of children: An economic perspective. The Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), 2-13.
  • Schultz, T.W. (1980). Nobel lecture: The economics of being poor. Journal of Political Economy, 88(4), 639-651.
  • Seibert, S.E., Kraimer, M.L., & Liden, R.C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219-237.
  • Selten, R., & Klopstech, A. (1984). Formale Konzepte eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens. In H. Todt (Ed.), Normgeleitetes Verhalten in den Sozialwissenschaften (pp.11-34). Berlin.
  • Simon, H.A. (1955). Behavioural model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
  • Smith, S.S., & Kulynych, J. (2002). It may be social, but why is it capital? The social construction of social capital and the politics of language. Politics & Society, 30(1), 149
  • Socialcapitalgateway. Retrieved September 9, 2009 http://www.socialcapitalgateway.org/
  • Spencer-Brown, G. (1973). Laws of form. Toronto, New York, London.
  • Stigler, G.J. & Becker, G.S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review, 67, 76-90.
  • Täube, V.G. (2002). Zur Messung des Sozialkapitals von Akteuren mit Einfluß in empirischen Netzwerken. Frankfurt a.M., Bern, Berlin.
  • Tönnies, S. (1996). Kommunitarismus - diesseits und jenseits des Ozeans. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B 36(96), 13-19.
  • Tullock, G., & MacKenzie, R.B. (1984). Homo oeconomicus: ökonomische Dimensionen des Alltags. Frankfurt a.M.
  • Turnbull, P., Ford, D., & Cunningham, M. (1996). Interaction, relationships and networks in business markets: An evolving perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 11(3/ 4), 44-62.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
  • Vanberg, V. (1975). Die zwei Soziologien. Tübingen.
  • Weesie, J., Verbebeek, A., & Flap, H. (1990). An economic theory of social networks. In J. Weesie, & H. Flap (Eds.), Social networks through time (pp.91-120). Utrecht.
  • Weimann, J. (1987). Normgesteuerte ökonomische Theorien. Frankfurt a.M, New York.
  • Wichardt, P.C. (2006). On why and how identity should influence utility. Retrieved September 9, 2009 from http://www.uibk.ac.at/economics/bbl/bbl- s06/wichardt.pdf
  • Wiesing, L. (2004). Zur Kritik am Interpretationismus oder die Trennung von Wahrheit und Methode. In G. Figal (Ed.), Internationales Jahrbuch für Hermeneutik. Band 3 (pp.137-151). Tübingen.
  • Wilson, T.P. (1973). Theorien der Interaktion und Modelle soziologischer Erklärung. In Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen (Eds.), Alltagswissen, Interaktion und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit. Band 1. Symbolischer Interaktionismus und Ethnomethodologie. Reinbek bei Hamburg.
  • Witt, P. (2004). Entrepreneurs‘ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16, 391-412.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1971). Tractatus logico philosophicus. Logisch philosophische Abhandlungen. Frankfurt a.M.
  • Wolf, D. (2005). Ökonomische Sicht(en) auf das Handeln. Marburg.
  • Woolcock, M. (1998). Social Capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151-208.
  • Worldbank. Retrieved September 9, 2009 from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTSOCIALDEVELOP MENT/EXTTSOCIALCAPITAL/0,,contentMDK:20193538~menuPK:401035~pagePK :148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:401015,00.html
  • Zierhofer, W. (2002). Gesellschaft. Transformation eines Problems. Oldenburg.
International Journal of Social Inquiry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1307-8364
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2008
  • Yayıncı: BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ > SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Managing the Educated Docility in the French Hypermarkets How Do the Unskilled Retail Jobs Seduce the Working Class Youth?

Mathieu Hocquelet

A New Perspective to Integrate Different Social Capital Concepts

Mark EULER, Jan FREESE

Does Gentrification Displace the Urban Poor? The Case of Bursa, Turkey

Doğan Bıçkı, Serhat Özgökçeler

Turkish Primary Education Students’ Evaluation Of The Instructional Activities Based On Social Learning Theory: Analysis Of An Experimental Study

Murat DEMİRBAŞ, Rahmi YAĞBASAN

From Foe to Friend: Turkish-Russian Relations in the 21st Century

Mert Gökırmak

Micro-Finance and Social Capital: A Study Of Microfinance Institutions in Andhra Pradesh, India-2009

D. Ajit, Rajeev C.B.