___

• Ahmad, R., and Yunos, Z. (2012). The Application of Mixed Method in Developing a Cyber Terrorism Framework. Journal of Information Security, Vol.03No.03, 6. doi:10.4236/jis.2012.33026
• Altier, M. B., Horgan, J., and Thoroughgood, C. (2012). In their own words? Methodological considerations in the analysis of terrorist autobiog-raphies. Journal of strategic security, 5(4), 85-98.
• Bakker, E. (2012). Forecasting Terrorism: The need for a more systematic approach. Journal of Strategic Security, 5(4), 69-84.
• Berg-Schlosser, D. (2012). Mixed Methods in Comparative Politics: Prin-ciples and Applications: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
• Berryman, D. R. (2019). Ontology, epistemology, methodology, and methods: Information for librarian researchers. Medical reference services quar-terly, 38(3), 271-279.
• Bond, J. R. (2007). The scientification of the study of politics: some ob-servations on the behavioral evolution in political science. The Journal of Poli-tics, 69(4), 897-907.
• Cherryholmes, C. H. (1992). Notes on pragmatism and scientific real-ism. Educational researcher, 21(6), 13-17.
• Clark, V. L. P. and J. W. Creswell (2008). Mixing quantitative and quali-tative approaches. Handbook of emergent methods, 363.
• Cordes, B. (1987). When terrorists do the talking: Reflections on terrorist literature. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 10(4), 150-171.
• Crenshaw, M. (2012). The causes of terrorism. Terrorism studies: A read-er, 99-114.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
• Davies, R. (2010). Critically examine the strengths and weaknesses of ter-rorism research giving examples from the recent literature. In Critical terrorism studies (pp. 230-250). Routledge.
• Dewey, J. (1931). Context and thought. University of California publica-tions in philosophy, 12(3).
• Dewey, J. (1999). The essential Dewey: Pragmatism, education, democ-racy (Vol. 1). Indiana University Press.
• Dolnik, A. (2011). Conducting field research on terrorism: A brief pri-mer. Perspectives on Terrorism, 5(2), 3-35.
• Elman, C., Gerring, J., and Mahoney, J. (2016). Case study research: Put-ting the quant into the qual. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(3), 375-391.
• Fowler, W. W. (1980). An agenda for quantitative research on terrorism. RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA.
• Gerring, J. (2011). How good is good enough? A multidimensional, best-possible standard for research design. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 625-636.
• Glaw, X., Inder, K., Kable, A., and Hazelton, M. (2017). Visual method-ologies in qualitative research: Autophotography and photo elicitation applied to mental health research. International journal of qualitative methods, 16(1), 1609406917748215.
• Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative infor-mation systems research. European journal of information systems, 21(2), 135-146.
• Gorard, S., and Taylor, C. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social research. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., and Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a con-ceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational evalua-tion and policy analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
• Gruenewald, J., Dooley, K. M. G., Suttmoeller, M. J., Chermak, S. M., and Freilich, J. D. (2016). A mixed-method analysis of fatal attacks on police by far-right extremists. Police Quarterly, 19(2), 216-245.
• Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualita-tive research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.
• Halcomb, E. J. (2015). Mixed methods research: The issues beyond com-bining methods. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75 (3), 499-501.
• Hall, R. (2013). Mixed Methods: In search of a paradigm. In T. Le (Ed.), Conducting Research in a Changing and Challenging World. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.
• Hanson, B. (2008). Wither qualitative/quantitative?: Grounds for method-ological convergence. Quality & Quantity, 42(1), 97-111.
• Horgan, J. (1997). Issues in terrorism research. The Police Journal, 70(3), 193-202.
• Horgan, J. (2012). Interviewing the terrorists: Reflections on fieldwork and implications for psychological research. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 4(3), 195-211.
• Lai, F., Hu, X., Chen, G., Zou, R., and Feng, Q. (2019). Quantitative re-search on global terrorist attacks and terrorist attack classifica-tion. Sustainability, 11(5), 1487.
• Huta, V. (2017). Meaning as a subjective experience. Journal of Con-structivist Psychology, 30(1), 20-25.
• Klein, H. K., and Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS quarterly, 67-93.
• LaFree, G., and Freilich, J. D. (2012). Editor’s introduction: quantitative approaches to the study of terrorism. Journal of Quantitative Criminolo-gy, 28(1), 1-5.
• Leiken, R. S., and Brooke, S. (2006). The quantitative analysis of terror-ism and immigration: an initial exploration. Terrorism and Political Vio-lence, 18(4), 503-521.
• Lützinger, S. (2012). The Other Side of the Story. A qualitative study of the biographies of extremists and terrorists. Germany: Bundeskriminalamt.
• Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin and B. Puranen et al. (eds.). (2022). World Values Survey: Round Six - Country-Pooled Datafile Version: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp. Madrid: JD Sys-tems Institute.
• Jones, A. (2007). Tackling obesities: future choices–obesogenic environ-ments–evidence review. London: Government Office for Science.
• Mahoney, J. (2007). Qualitative methodology and comparative poli-tics. Comparative political studies, 40(2), 122-144.
• Merari, A. (2012). Academic research and government policy on terror-ism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 3(1), 88-102.
• Merari, A. (2007). Psychological aspects of suicide terrorism. Psychology of terrorism, 101-115.
• Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Meth-odological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative meth-ods. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(1), 48-76.
• Neuman, L. W. (2007). Social research methods, 6/E. Pearson Education India.
• Norris, J. J., and Grol-Prokopczyk, H. (2018). Entrapment allegations in right-wing terrorism cases: A mixed-methods analysis. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 53(1), 77-88.
• Ortner, S. B. (2016). Subjectivity and cultural critique. Anthropological Theory, 5(1): 31-52.
• Pew Research Center. (2018). Globally, People Point to ISIS and Climate Change as Leading Security Threats, Pew Research Center.
• Pluye, P., Robert, E., Cargo, M., Bartlett, G., O’cathain, A., Griffiths, F., and Rousseau, M. C. (2011). Proposal: A mixed methods appraisal tool for sys-tematic mixed studies reviews. Montréal: McGill University, 2(1), 1-8.
• Quine, O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. In Can theories be refut-ed? (pp. 41-64). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Reid, E. F., and Chen, H. (2007). Mapping the contemporary terrorism re-search domain. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(1), 42-56.
• Reid, E. O. (1997). Evolution of a body of knowledge: An analysis of ter-rorism research. Information Processing & Management, 33(1), 91-106.
• Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., and Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative meta-synthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in nursing & health, 20(4), 365-371.
• Schuurman, B. (2020). Research on terrorism, 2007–2016: A review of data, methods, and authorship. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1011-1026.
• Shareia, B. F. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative case study research method on social science: Accounting perspective. International Journal of Eco-nomics and Management Engineering, 10(12), 3849-3854.
• Silke, A. (2001). The devil you know: Continuing problems with research on terrorism. Terrorism and political violence, 13(4), 1-14.
• Simon, P. (2015). Ontology. A data quality ontology for the secondary use of EHR data. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings (Vol. 2015, p. 1937). American Medical Informatics Association.
• Small, M. L. (2011). How to conduct a mixed methods study: Recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annual review of sociology, 37(1), 57-86.
• Smith, A. G., Suedfeld, P., Conway III, L. G., and Winter, D. G. (2008). The language of violence: Distinguishing terrorist from nonterrorist groups by thematic content analysis. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 1(2), 142-163.
• Storey, J. (2007). Human resource management: Still marching on, or marching out. Human resource management: A critical text, 1(1), 3-32.
• Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., and Teddlie, C. B. (1998). Mixed Methodo-logy: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: SAGE Publications.
• Taylor, C. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social re-search. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. SAGE Publications.
• Teymur, S. (2007). A conceptual map for understanding the terrorist re-cruitment process: Observation and analysis of DHKP /C, PKK, and Turkish Hezbollah terrorist organizations (Order No. 3288287). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (304814594). Retrieved from https://ezproxy.lis.nsysu.edu.tw/ezproxy/Authentication/Authentication_Interface.php?url= /dissertations-theses/conceptual-map-understanding-terrorist/docview/304814594/se-2
• Thaler, K. M. (2016). Mixed methods research in the study of political and social violence and conflict. Journal of mixed methods research, 11(1), 59-76.
• Tiwari, A., Chan, K. L., Cheung, D. S. T., Fong, D. Y. T., Yan, E. C. W., and Tang, D. H. M. (2015). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and sit-uational couple violence on mental health outcomes among abused Chinese women: a mixed-method study. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1-12.
• Yauch, C. A., and Steudel, H. J. (2003). Complementary use of qualitative and quantitative cultural assessment methods. Organizational research meth-ods, 6(4), 465-481.
• Yilmaz, I. (2009). Patterns of Differential Involvement in Terrorist Activi-ties: Evidence from DHKP/C and Turkish Hezbollah. (Doctoral Doctoral Disser-tation), Virginia Commonwealth University, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.
• Yvonne Feilzer, M. (2010). "Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmati-cally: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm." Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6-16.