ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM

ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM

The current study examined the psychometric features of the Turkish translation of the Mate Retention InventoryShort Form (MRI-SF) in Turkey. For this study, 286 participants were recruited with 78 participants (27.3%) being men and 208 participants (72.7%) women between the ages of 18 and 34 (M = 22.1, SD = 2.79). Participants were requested to complete a demographic form, the Turkish version of the Mate Retention InventoryShort Form (MRI-SF), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and Multidimensional Jealousy Scale. Consistent with the earlier studies, the 19 mate retention tactics constituted a twocomponent structure. Sex differences in the adoption of mate retention strategies were investigated in order to assess the construct validity of the Turkish version of the MRI-SF. Additionally, the relationship between mate retention strategies and sexual jealousy and self-esteem was examined to determine the construct validity. The findings were in accordance with the previous studies and the analyses revealed that the Turkish MRI-SF is a valid measurement tool.

___

  • Albert, G., & Arnocky, S. (2016). Use of mate retention strategies. Encyclo-pedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
  • Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 24
  • Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J. L., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females' indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19, 290–303.
  • Atari, M., Barbaro, N., Shackelford, T. K., & Chegeni, R. (2017). Psycho-metric evaluation and cultural correlates of the Mate Retention Inventory–short form (MRI-SF) in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), 1474704917695267. *
  • Bale, C., & Archer, J. (2013). Self-perceived attractiveness, romantic desira-bility and self-esteem: A mating sociometer perspective. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 68–84
  • Barnett, O. W., Martinez, T. E., and Bluestein, B. (1995). Jealousy and ro-mantic attachment in martially violent and non-violent men. Journal of Interperson-al Violence, 10, 473-486.
  • Braun, M. F., & Bryan, A. (2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 805-819.
  • Brewer, G., & Riley, C. (2009). Height, relationship satisfaction, jealousy, and mate retention. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(3), 147470490900700310.
  • Buss, D. M. (1988a). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tac-tics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.
  • Buss, D. M. (1988b). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317.
  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolution-ary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
  • Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Free Press
  • Buss, D. M. (2002). Human mate guarding. Neuroendocrinology Let-ters, 23(4), 23-29.
  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(2), 346.
  • Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differ-ences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological science, 3(4), 251-256.
  • Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., & McKibbin, W. F. (2008). The mate reten-tion inventory-short form (MRI-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 44(1), 322-334.
  • Buunk, B., and Bringle, R. G. (1987). Jealousy in love relationships. In Perlman, D., and Duck, S. W. (Eds.) Intimate Relationships: Development, Dynam-ics and Deterioration (pp. 123-147). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications
  • Carducci, B. J. (2020). Evolutionary Theory and Personality Correlates of Mate Selection. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 149-153.
  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution, and behavior (No. Sirsi) i9780871507679). Boston: Willard Grant Press.
  • Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jeal-ousy. Ethology and sociobiology, 3(1), 11-27.
  • Davis, A. C., Desrochers, J., DiFilippo, A., Vaillancourt, T., & Arnocky, S. (2018). Type of jealousy differentially predicts cost‐inflicting and benefit‐provisioning mate retention. Personal Relationships, 25(4), 596-610.
  • De Miguel, A., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Mate retention tactics in Spain: Per-sonality, sex differences, and relationship status. Journal of personality, 79(3), 563-586.
  • DeKay, W. T., & Buss, D. M. (1992). Human nature, individual differences, and the importance of context: Perspectives from evolutionary psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(6), 184-189.
  • Eisinga, R., TeGrotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642 Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Euler, H. A., Hoier, S., Schmitt, D. P., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2005). Mate retention, semen dis-placement, and human sperm competition: A preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 749–763.
  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention deci-sions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational research methods, 7(2), 191-205.
  • Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and in-dividual differences, 28(3), 501-513.
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  • Holden, C. J., Shackelford, T. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Miner, E. J., Kaighobadi, F., Starratt, V. G., ... & Buss, D. M. (2014). Husband's esteem predicts his mate retention tactics. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 147470491401200311.
  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185.
  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (authorized edition).
  • Kardum, I., Hudek-Knezevic, J., & Gracanin, A. (2006). Sociosexuality and mate retention in romantic couples. Psihologijske Teme, 5, 277–296.
  • Kernis, M. H. (2013). Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of cur-rent perspectives. psychology press.
  • Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they say?. Organizational research methods, 9(2), 202-220.
  • Leary, M. R. (1990). Responses to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychol-ogy, 9, 221–229.
  • Leary, M. R. (2003). Commentary on self-esteem as an interpersonal moni-tor: The sociometer hypothesis (1995). Psychological Inquiry, 14, 270–274
  • Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of person-ality and social psychology, 68(3), 518.
  • Lopes, G. S., Shackelford, T. K., Santos, W. S., Farias, M. G., & Segundo, D. S. (2016). Mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF): Adaptation to the Brazilian context. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 36-40.
  • McKibbin, W. F., Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Schipper, L. D., Starratt, V. G., & Stewart-Williams, S. (2007). Why do men insult their intimate partners? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 231–241.
  • Miner, E. J., Shackelford, T. K., & Starratt, V. G. (2009). Mate value of ro-mantic partners predicts men’s partner-directed verbal insults. Personality and Indi-vidual Differences, 46(2), 135-139.
  • Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differ-ences, 47(3), 214-218.
  • Murat, A. K. A. (2012). Türkiye’de diller ve etnik gruplar. Uluslararası Tü-rkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 1(1), 293-297.
  • Nascimento, B. S., & Little, A. C. (2019). Mate retention strategies, self-esteem, mate value and facial attractiveness disparity in Brazil and in the UK. Journal of sex & marital therapy, 45(6), 461-472.
  • Nunnally, J.C. (1970). Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill
  • Pham, M. N., Barbaro, N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Development and initial validation of the coalitional mate retention inventory. Evolutionary Psycho-logical Science, 1(1), 4-12.
  • Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory. Per-sonality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 415-425.
  • Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Buss, D. M., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2005). When we hurt the ones we love: Predicting violence against women from men's mate retention. Personal Relationships, 12(4), 447-463.
  • Shrestha, K., Rees, D. W., Rix, K. J. B., Hore, B. D., & Faragher, E. B. (1985). Sexual jealousy in alcoholics. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 72(3), 283-290.
  • Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Zeigler-Hill, V., Fulton, J. J., & McLemore, C. (2012). Discrepancies be-tween explicit and implicit self-esteem: Implications for mate retention strategies and perceived infidelity. The Journal of social psychology, 152(6), 670-686.