___

• Adigözel, S. (2012): Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Fen Ve Teknoloji Öğretimine Yönelik Pedagojik Hoşnutsuzluk Düzeylerinin Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Zonguldak.
• American Association for the Advancement of Science Project 2061. (1993). Benchmark for science literacy. Washington: Oxford University Pres.
• Amy Feiker Hollenbeck & Mindy Kalchman (2013). Professional development for conceptual change: extending the paradigm to teaching reading comprehension in US schools, Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 638-655. doi:10.1080/19415257.2012.728535
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
• Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75-78. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00064
• Bardak, Ş., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). Investigation about using strategies, methods and techniques of science teachers based on pedagogical content knowledge. Amasya Education Journal, 5(2), 567-605.
• Berkovich, I. 2011. ‘‘No, we won’t Teachers’ Resistance to Educational Reform.’’ Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 563-578. doi:10.1108/09578231111159548
• Bruce, C. D., & Ross, J. A. (2008). A model for increasing reform implementation and teacher efficacy: teacher peer coaching in grade 3 and 6 mathematics. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(2), 346-370.
• Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473-490. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
• Czerniak,C.M. (1990). A Study of Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, and Science Knowledge in Preservice Elemantary Teachers. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
• Demirkan, Ö., & Saraçoğlu G. (2016). Anadolu lisesi öğretmenlerinin derslerde kullandıkları öğretim yöntem ve tekniklerine ilişkin görüşleri. The Journal of International Lingual, Social and Educational Sciences, 2(1), 1-11.
• Donnell, L. A., & Gettinger, M. (2015). Elementary school teachers' acceptability of school reform: Contribution of belief congruence, self-efficacy, and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 47-57. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.003
• Durán, A., Extremera, N., Rey, L., Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Montalbán, F. M. (2006). Predicting academic burnout and engagement in educational settings: Assessing the incremental validity of perceived emotional intelligence beyond perceived stress and general self-efficacy. Psicothema, 18, 158–164
• Erden, E. 2007. Sınıf öğretmenlerinin fen öğretimi öz yeterlilik inançlarının fen tutumları ve akademik başarıları üzerindeki etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İlköğretim Anabilim Dalı, İzmir.
• Fackler, S., & Malmberg, L. E. (2016). Teachers' self-efficacy in 14 OECD countries: Teacher, student group, school doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.002 effects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 185-195.
• Fogleman, J., McNeill, K., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Examining the effect of teachers’ adaptations of a middle school science inquiry-oriented curriculum unit on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 149-169. doi:10.1002/tea.20399
• Gabriele, L. J., & Joram, E. (2007). Teachers’ reflections on their reform-based teaching in mathematics: Implications for the development of teacher self-efficacy. Action in Teacher Education, 29(3), 60-74. doi:10.1080/01626620.2007.10463461
• Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731–767. doi:10.3102/00028312040003731
• Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teacher’s cognition and appraisal processes doi:10.1023/A:10234771 conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147–179.
• Guskey, T.R. (1988). Teacher self-efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69. 051X(88)90025-X doi:10.1016/0742
• Hodges, C. B., Gale, J., & Meng, A. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy during the implementation of a problem- based science curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 16(4), 434-451.
• Hollenbeck, A., & Kalchman, M. (2013). Professional development for conceptual change: Extending the paradigm to teaching reading comprehension in US schools. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 638-655. doi:10.1080/19415257.2012.728535
• Kahveci, A., Kahveci, M., Mansour, N., & Alarfaj, M. M. (2018). Exploring science teachers’ affective states: Pedagogical discontentment, self-efficacy, intentions to reform, and their relationships. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1359-1386. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9606-y
• Koksal, M.S., Southerland, S. A. (2018). What is value of reform-oriented in-service teacher development attempts on inquiry teaching for pedagogically discontented science teachers? An expectancy- value perspective, Education and Science, 43(194), 157-184. doi:10.15390/EB.2018.7203
• Lardy, C. H., & Mason, C. L. (2011, June). Investigating reform and comparison courses: Long-term impact on elementary teachers’ self-efficacy. A paper presented at the NSEUS National Conference on Research Based Undergraduate Science Teaching: Investigating Reform in Classrooms, Bryant Conference Center, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
• Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers' epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38-62.
• Malmberg, L., Hagger, H., & Webster, S. (2014). Teachers’ situation-specific mastery experiences: Teacher, student group and lesson effects. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(3), 429–451. doi:10.1007/s10212-013-0206-1
• Miller, A., Ramirez, E., & Murdock, T. (2017). The influence of teachers’ self-efficacy on perceptions: Perceived teacher competence and respect and student effort and achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education 64(2017), 260-269. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.008
• National Commission on Excellence in Education. (NCEE). (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education United States Department of Education by the National Commission on Excellence in Education.
• National Research Council (2002). Scientific research in education. Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. R. J. Shavelson & L. Towne, Eds, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4).
• National Research Council. (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• National Research Council. (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national standards in science education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington: The National Academies Press.
• Olitsky, S. (2015). Facilitating changes in college teaching practices: Instructional reform, identity conflict, and professional community in a K-20 partnership. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 625 – 646. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9441-y
• Riggs, I. M. &Enochs L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(69), 625-637. doi:10.1002/sce.3730740605
• Saka, Y. (2007). Exploring the interaction of personal and contextual factors during the induction period of science teachers and how this interaction shapes their enactment of science reform. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University).
• Saka, Y. (2013). Who are the science teachers that seek professional development in research experience for teachers (RET’s)? Implications for teacher professional development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 934–951. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9440-1
• Settlage, J., Southerland, S. A., Smith, L. K., & Ceglie, R. (2009). Constructing a doubt-free teaching self: selfefficacy, teacher identity, and science instruction within diverse settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 102–125. doi:10.1002/tea.20268
• Smith, L., & Southerland, S.A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms? Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 396-423. doi:10.1002/tea.20165
• Southerland, S. A., Nadelson, L., Sowell, S., Kahveci, M., Saka, Y., & Granger, E. M. (2012). Measuring one aspect of teachers’ affective states: Development of the science teachers’ pedagogical discontentment scale. School Science & Mathematics, 112(8), 483–494. doi:10.1111/j.1949- 8594.2012.00168.x
• Southerland, S., Sowell, S., Blanchard, M., & Granger, E. M. (2011). Exploring the construct of pedagogical discontentment: a tool to understand science teachers’ openness to reform. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 299–317. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9166-5
• Southerland,S.A., Sowell, S., Kahveci, M., Granger, D.E.& Gaede, O. (2006). Working to Measure the Impact of Professional Development Activities: Developing and Instrument to Quantify Pedagogical Discontentment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco,CA.
• Sowell, S., Southerland, S., & Granger, E. (2006). Exploring the construct of teacher pedagogical discontentment: A tool to understand teachers’ openness to reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
• Spillane, J. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143-175. doi:10.1080/002202799183205
• Sunal, D. W., Hodges, J., Sunal, C. S., Whitaker, K. W., Freeman, L. M., Edwards, L., Odell, M. (2010). Teaching science in higher education: Faculty professional development and barriers to change. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 246-257. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18027.x
• Tyack, D. B., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
• Uzal, G., Erdem, A. ve Ersoy, Y. (2016). Bir grup matematik ve fen bilimleri öğretmeninin sınıf içinde gerçekleştirdikleri öğretim etkinliklerininin incelenmesi. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 64-85.
• Wheatley, K. F. (2000). Positive teacher efficacy as an obstacle to educational reform. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 34(1), 14–27.
• Wheatley, K. F. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 5–22. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00047-6
• Wheatley, K. F. (2005). The case for reconceptualizing teacher efficacy research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 747–766. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.009
• Williams, D.M. (2010). Outcome expectancy and self-efficacy: Theoretical implications of an unresolved contradiction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 417–425. doi:10.1177/1088868310368802