___

• Akyol, H. (2006). Türkçe öğretim yöntemleri. Ankara: Kök Yayıncılık.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs.
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Second edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
• DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Workman, K. (2012). A quasi experimental study of afterevent reviews and leadership development. Journal of Applied Psychology 97, 681-689.
• Dixon-Krauss, L. (1996). Vygotsky in the classroom: Mediated instruction and assessment. New York: Longman Publishing.
• Gambrell, L. B., Mazzoni, S. A., & Almasi, J. F. (2000). Promoting collaboration, social interaction, and engagement with text. In L. Baker, M.J. Dreher, & J.T. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 119-139). New York: Guilford Press.
• Guthrie, J. T., & Anderson, E. (1999). Engagement in reading. In J.T. Guthrie, and D.E. Alvermann (Eds.), Engaged reading: Processes, practices, and policy implications (pp. 17-45). New York: Teachers College Press.
• Hepler, S. I., & Hickman, J. (1982). “The book was okay. I love you”: Social aspects of response to literature. Theory into Practice, 21, 278-283.
• Kasten, W. C., & Yıldırım, K. (2011). Türk öğrencilerin iyi birer okuryazar olmalarına yönelik öneriler. Ankara: Maya Akademi.
• Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230-251.
• Morrow, L. M., Kuhn, M. R., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). The family fluency program. The Reading Teacher, 60, 322-333.
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00–4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• O’Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A.M. O’Donnell, & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 179-196).
• Rasinski, T. V. (1989). Fluency for everyone: incorporating fluency instruction in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 42, 690–693.
• Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Creating fluent readers. Educational Leadership, 61, 46-51.
• Rasinski, T. V., & Hoffman, J. V. (2003). Theory and research into practice: Oral reading in the school literacy curriculum. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 510-522.
• Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N. D., Linek, V., & Sturtevant, E. (1994). Effects of fluency development on urban secondgrade readers. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 158-165.
• Rasinski, T. V., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 350-361.
• Rasinski, T.V. (2010). The fluent reader: Oral & silent reading strategies for building fluency, word recognition & comprehension (2nd.). New York: Scholastic.
• Rasinski,T. V., & Padak, N. D. (2005). Three-minute reading assessments: Word recognition, fluency & comprehension 5-8. New York: Scholastic.
• Reutzel, D. R., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (1993). Effects of fluency training on second graders’ reading comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 86, 325-331.
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Royer, J. M. (2001). Developing reading and listening comprehension tests based on the sentence verification technique (SVT). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45, 30-41.
• Royer, J. M., Greene, B. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1987). The sentence verification technique: A practical procedure for testing comprehension. Journal of Reading, 30, 414-422.
• Ruddell, R. B. (2002). Teaching children to read and write: Becoming an effective literacy teacher (Third edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Ruddell, R. B., & Unrau, N. J. (2004). Reading as a meaning construction process: The reader, the text, and the teacher. In R.B. Ruddell, & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., p. 1462-1521). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Rumelhart, D. E. (2004). Toward an interactive model of reading. In R.B. Ruddell, & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., p. 1149-1180). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Tompkins, G. E. (2007). Literacy for the 21st Century. Teaching reading and writing in prekindergarten through grade 4 (Second Edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
• Ulusoy, M., & Çetinkaya, Ç. (2012). Cümle doğrulama tekniğinin okuma ve dinlemenin ölçülmesinde kullanılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43, 460-471.
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Wigfield, A. (2000). Facilitating children’s reading motivation. In L. Baker, M.J. Dreher, and J.T. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 140-158). New York: Guilford Press.
• Winne, P. H (1985). Steps toward promoting cognitive achievements. The Elementary School Journal, 85, 673693.
• Yildirim, K., Yildiz, M., Ates, S., & Cetinkaya, C. (2009). Effect of prosodic reading on listening comprehension. World applied Sciences Journal, 7, 744-747.
• Zutell, J., & Rasinski, T. V. (1991). Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency. Theory into Practice, 30, 211-217.