___

• [1] Jun S, Ahamad M. Incentives in bittorrent induce free riding. In 2005 ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-peer Systems; 22 August 2005; New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp. 116–121.
• [2] Liogkas N, Nelson R, Kohler E, Zhang L. Exploiting bittorrent for fun (but not profit). In 2006 International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems; 27-28 February 2006; Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
• [3] Locher T, Moor P, Schmid S, Wattenhofer R. Free riding in bittorrent is cheap. In 2006 Fifth Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-V); 29 November 2006; Irvine, CA, USA. pp. 85-90.
• [4] Levin D, LaCurts K, Spring N, Bhattacharjee B. Bittorrent is an auction: Analyzing and improving bittorrent’s incentives. Comp Comm R 2008; 38: 243–254.
• [5] Marti S, Garcia-Molina H. Taxonomy of trust: Categorizing p2p reputation systems. Comput Netw 2006; 50: 472–484.
• [6] Zhu B, Jajodia S, Kankanhalli MS. Building trust in peer-to-peer systems: a review. Int J Sec Netw 2006, 1: 103–112.
• [7] Dingledine R, Mathewson N, Syverson P. Reputation in p2p anonymity systems. In 2003 Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems; 5-6 June 2003; Berkeley, CA, USA.
• [8] Friedman EJ, Resnick P. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. J Econ Manage Strat 2000; 10: 173–199.
• [9] Marti S, Garcia-Molina H. Identity crisis: Anonymity vs. reputation in p2p systems. In 2003 International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing; 1 September 2003; Washington, DC, USA: IEEE. pp. 134–141.
• [10] Küpçü A, Lysyanskaya A. Usable optimistic fair exchange. Comput Netw 2012; 56: 50 – 63.