A Research On Deformation Based Buckling Damage Limit For Reinforced Concrete Columns

A Research On Deformation Based Buckling Damage Limit For Reinforced Concrete Columns

Buckling damage at longitudinal reinforcement of a reinforced concrete column under inelastic demand, leads to a rapid and significant decrease in capacity. Structural damage can be obtained in a more Abstract: Buckling damage at longitudinal reinforcement of a reinforced concrete column under inelastic realistic way with deformation based design methods compared to force based methods. In this study, an demand, leads to a rapid and significant decrease in capacity. Structural damage can be obtained in a more existing deformation based buckling damage limit state is introduced and the comparison of mentioned realistic way with deformation based design methods compared to force based methods. In this study, an damage limit state with experimental results is carried out. existing deformation based buckling damage limit state is intr

___

  • [1] Mau, S.T. and El-Mabsout, M., Inelastic Buckling of Reinforcing Bars, 1989, ASCE, J. Eng. Mech., 115(1): 1-17.
  • [2] Monti, G., and Nuti, C. Nonlinear cyclic behavior of reinforcing bars including buckling. J. Struct. Eng.,1992 118(12), 3268–3284.
  • [3] Gomes, A., and Appleton, J. Nonlinear cyclic stress-strain relationship of reinforcing bars including buckling, 1997, Eng. Struct., 19(10), 822–826.
  • [4] Rodriguez, M., Botero, J., and Villa, J. Cyclic stress-strain behavior of reinforcing steel including effect of buckling, 1999, J. Struct. Eng., 125(6), 605–612.
  • [5] Yalçın, C., and Saatçioğlu, M., Inelastic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Columns,Computers and Structures, 2000, No. 8, 539-555.
  • [6] Moyer, M., and Kowalsky, M., Influence of tension strain on buckling of reinforcement in RC bridge columns, 2001, Dept. of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State Univ. , Raleigh, N.C.
  • [7] Hose, Y. D. Seismic performance and failure behavior of plastic hinge regions in flexural bridge columns, 2001, PhD dissertation, Dept. Of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California, San Diego.
  • [8] Bae, S., Seismic Performance of Full-Scale Reinforced Concrete Columns, 2005, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
  • [9] Mieses, A.M., Inelastic Buckling Behavior of Concrete Reinforcing Bars under Monotonic Uniaxial Compressive Loading, 2002, M.S. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
  • [10] Aydemir, C , Eser Aydemir, M., Betonarme Kirişlerin Hasar Sınırlarının Deneysel Gözlemlerle İrdelenmesi, 2017, Teknik Dergi, 28 (4), 8023-8049.
  • [11] Dhakal, R.P. and Maekawa, K., Reinforcement Stability and Fracture of Cover Concrete in Reinforced Concrete Members, 2002, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 128(10):1253-1262.
  • [12] Berry, M.P. and Eberhard, M.O., A Practical Performance Model for Bar Buckling, 2005, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 131(7):1060-1270.
  • [13] Seismosoft, SeismoStruct v7.0 – A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures, 2014, available from http://www.seismosoft.com.
  • [14] Ghulam Mostafa WAZIRY, Betonarme Kolonlarda Burkulma Hasar Limiti, 2018, Yüksek lisans tezi, Istanbul Aydın Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • [15] Ang Beng G., Priestley, M.J.N., and Park, R., Ductility of Reinforced Bridge Piers Under Seismic Loading, Report 81-3, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, February 1981.
  • [16] Soesianawati, M.T., Park, R., and Priestley, M.J.N., Limited Ductility Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns, Report 86-10, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, March 1986.
  • [17] Tanaka H., and Park R., Effect of lateral confining reinforcement on the ductile behavior of reinforced concrete columns. Report 90-2, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, June 1990, 458 pages.
  • [18] Park, R., and Paulay, T., Use of Interlocking Spirals for Transverse Reinforcement in Bridge Columns. Strength and Ductility of Concrete Substructures of Bridges, RRU (Road Research Unit) Bulletin 84, Vol. 1, 1990, pp. 77-92.
  • [19] Wehbe, N., and Saiidi, M.S., and Sanders, D., Confinement of Rectangular Bridge Columns for Modrate Seismic Areas, 1998, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER) Bulletin, 12(1).
  • [20] Nosho, K., Stanton, J., and MacRae, G., Retrofit of Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Columns using Tonen Forca Tow Sheet Carbon Fiber Wrapping, 1996, Report No. SGEM 96-2, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • [21] Saatcioglu, M., and Grira, M., Confinement of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Welded Reinforcement Grids, 1999, ACI Struct. J., 96(1), 29-39.
  • [22] Watson, S., and Park, R., Design of Reinforced Concrete Frames of Limited Ductility, 1989, Report 89-4, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • [23] Cheok, G.S., and Stone, W.C., Behavior of 1/6-Scale Model Bridge Columns Subjected to Cycle Inelastic Loading, 1986, NBSIR 86-3494, U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
  • [24] Kunnath, S., El-Bahy, A., Taylor, A., and Stone, W., Cumulative Seismic Damage of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers, 1997, Technical Report NCEER-97-0006, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, New York.