___

• Abrahamson, Eric (1996), “Management fashion”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.21, No.1, pp. 254-285.
• Adler, Paul, Linda C. Forbes and Hugh Willmott (2007), “Critical Management
• Studies”, (in James P. Walsh and Arthur P. Brief Eds., Academy of Management Annals 1), New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 119-180. Alvesson, Mats and Hugh Willmott (1992), Critical Management Studies. London: Sage.
• Baofu, Peter (2007), The Future of Complexity. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
• Barnard, Chester I. (1938), The Functions of the Executive, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Bruce, Kyle and Chris Nyland (2011), “Elton Mayo and the deification of human relations”, Organization Studies, Vol.32, No.3, pp. 383-405.
• Burrell, Gibson (1999), “Normal science, paradigms, metaphors, discourses and genealogies of analysis”, (in Stewart R. Clegg and Cynthia Hardy Eds., Studying Organization: Theory and Method) London: Sage, pp. 388–404
• Cooper, Robert and Gibson Burrell (1988), “Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction”, Organization Studies Vol.9, No. 1, pp. –112.
• Copley, Frank B. (1923), Frederick W. Taylor: Father of Scientific Management, vols. New York: Harper.
• Czarniawska, Barbara (2003), “Social constructionism in organization studies”,
• (in Robert Westwood and Stewart Clegg Eds. Debating Organization) Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 128-139. Daft, Richard L. and Arie Y. Lewin (1990), “Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket: An editorial essay”, Organization Science, Vol. 1, No.1. pp.1-9.
• Deal, Terence E. and Allan A. Kennedy (1982), Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
• DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W. Powell (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”,
• American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 147-160. Farazmand, Ali (2003), “Chaos and transformation theories: A theoretical analysis with implications for organization theory and public management”, Public
• Organization Review: A Global Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 339-372. Fiedler, Fred E. (1967), A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness, NY: McGraw- Hill.
• Follett, Mary P. (1918), The New State: Group Organisation: The Solution for
• Popular Government, NY: Longmans Green. Follett, Mary P. (1924), Creative Experience, NY: Longmans Green.
• Frijda, Nico H. (1988), “The laws of emotion”, American Psychologist, Vol.43, No.5, pp. 349-358.
• George, Claude (1972), The History of Management Thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Hannan, Micheal and John Freeman (1977), “The population ecology of organizations, “American Journal of Sociology, Vol.82, No.5, pp. 929-964.
• Hannan, Micheal and John Freeman (1989), Organizational Ecology, Cambridge,
• MA: Harvard University Press. Hassard, John (1999), “Postmodernism, philosophy and management: concepts and controversies”, International Journal of Management Reviews,Vol.1, No. 2, pp. 171-195.
• Hassard, John and Martin Parker (1993), Postmodernism and Organizations, London: Sage.
• Hillier, Fred S., Mark S. Hillier, Karl Schmedders and Molly Stephens (2008),
• Introduction to Management Science, Singapore: McGraw-Hill. Irvin, Lisa (2002), “Ethics in organizations: A chaos perspective”, Journal of
• Organizational Change and Development, Vol.15, No. 4, pp. 359-381. Johnson, Jonathan L. and Brian B. Burton (1994), “Chaos and complexity theory for management”, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol.3, No.4, pp. 320-328.
• Khurana, Rakesh (2007), From Higher Ends to Higher Hands, Princeton, NJ:
• Princeton University Press. Kuhn, Thomas. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago:
• University of Chicago Press. Levy, David (1994), “Chaos theory and strategy: theory, application and managerial implications”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 167-178.
• Locke, Robert R. (1996), The Collapse of the American Management Mystique,
• Oxford: Oxford University Press. McKelvey, Bill (1999), “Complexity theory in organization science: Seizing the promise or becoming a fad?”, Emergence, Vol.1, No.1, pp.5-32.
• Mendellhall, Mark .E., James H. Macomber and Marc Cutright (2000), “Mary
• Parker Follett: prophet of chaos and complexity”, Journal of Management History, Vol. 6, No.4, pp. 191-204. Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan (1977), “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol.83, No.2, pp. 340–363.
• Mingers, (2006), “A critique of statistical modelling in management science from a critical realist perspective: Its role within multimethodology”, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 57, No.2, pp. 202-219.
• Morgan, Gareth (2006), Images of Organization, London: Sage.
• Perrow, Charles (1967), “A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations”, Ameican Sociology Review,Vol. 32, No.2, pp. 194-208.
• Perrow, Charles (1986). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, Glenview, IL: Scott,Foresman.
• Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Christina T. Fong. (2002), “The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye”, Academy of Management Learning and Education (September), pp. 78–95.
• Priesmeyer, Richard H. (1992), Organizations and Chaos. Westport: Quorum Books.
• Rahim, M. Afzalur (1983), “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2., pp. 368-376.
• Schwartz, John (2011) The limits of safeguards and human foresight, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/13/weekinreview/13limits.html?_r=1 retrieved on 30.03.2011
• Scott, Richard W. (2004), “Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology”, Annual Review of Sociology,Vol.30, pp. 1–21.
• Shenhav, Yehouda (2003), “The historical and epistemological foundations of organization theory: Fusing Sociological theory with engineering discourse”, (in Haridimos Tsoukas and Christian Knudsen Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory) Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183-209.
• Shrivastava, Paul (1994), “Castrated environment: Greening organization studies”, Organization Studies, Vol. 15, No.5, pp. 705-726.
• Smircich, Linda and Marta B. Calas (1995), “Introduction”, (in Linda M. Smircich and Marta B. Calas Eds., Critical perspectives on organization and management theory)Aldershot: Dartmouth, pp. xii-xxix
• Smith, Peter A. C. (2003), “Implications of complexity and chaos theories for organizations that learn”, The Learning Organization, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 321
• Stacey, Ralph D. (1992), Managing the Unknowable, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
• Starbuck, William H (2003), “The origins of organization theory”, (in Haridimos Tsoukas and Christian Knudsen Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory) Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143-182.
• Suzuki, D.T. (1997), Zen Budizm, İstanbul: Yol Yayınları.
• Taylor,Frederick (1911), The Principles of Scientific Management, NY: Harper.
• Tetzner, Reiner (2004), Cermen Tanrı ve Kahramanlarının Efsaneleri, İzmir: İlya Yayınevi.
• Thiétart,R.A and B. Forgues (1995), “Chaos theory and organization”,
• Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 19-31
• Townley, Barbara (1993), “Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No.3, pp. 518-545.
• Weick, Karl (1969), The Social Psychology of Organizing, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Wilding, Richard D. (1998), “Chaos theory: Implications for Supply Chain
• Management”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9, No.1, pp. 56. Williamson, Oliver E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust
• Implications. New York: Free Press. Wren, Daniel A. (2004), The History of Management Thought, NY: John Wiley & Sons.