Türkiye'de Yayılış Gösteren Bazı Tıbbi Rumex Türlerinin Anatomik Özelliklerinin Karşılaştırmalı Olarak İncelenmesi
Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de yayılış gösteren Rumexcinsine ait. R. crispusL., R. patientia L., R. obtusifoliusL. türlerinin anatomik özellikleri karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiştir. Anatomik çalışmalar için kök, gövde ve yapraktan enine kesitler alınmıştır. Ayrıca yapraktan yüzeysel kesitler alınarak stoma indeksi ve stoma özellikleri belirlenmiştir. R. obtusifoliuskökünde druz kristallare rastlanmıştır. R. crispuskökünde 4-5 kollu demetler radyal şekilde dizilmiştir. Sadece R. obtusifoliusgövdesinde glandular örtü tüyüne rastlanmıştır. R. crispusgövdesinde kutikula mevcuttur. Taksonların gövde köşe sayıları da türler açısından farklılık göstermektedir. R. crispus10, R. obtusifolius8, R. patientia14 köşelidir. Türlerin gövdelerindeki kollenkima tabaka sayıları ve tipleri de birbirinden farklıdır. Taksonların yaprak enine kesitlerinde orta damar bölgesinde dışarıya doğru çıkıntı tespit edilmiştir. Bu çıkıntı R. crispus’ta az belirgin, R. obtusifolius’ta iseçok belirgindir. Yaprak yüzeylerindeki stoma sayısı en az R. obtusifoliustüründe gözlenmiştir. R. patientiatüründe yaprak epidermis hücre çeperleri dalgalıdır. Tüm türlerin yapraklarında çok sayıda druz kristali belirlenmiştir.
Comparative Anatomical Features Study of the Some Medicinal Rumex Species Distributed in Turkey
Distributed in Turkey Rumexcrispus L., RumexpatientiaL., anatomical features of Rumex obtusifoliusspecies were comparatively investigated in this study. For anatomical studies, cross-sections were taken from root, stem and leaf. In addition, superficial sections were taken from the leaf and stomata index and stomata features were determined. Drusecrystals were found at the root of the R. obtusifolius.The radial-shaped vascular bundles in the root of R. crispushad 4-5 arms. Glandular hair was found only in the stemof R. obtusifolius. It is also characteristic that vascular bundles were scattered in the stem of this species. There was cuticle in the stem of R. crispus. Stem corner numbers of taxaalso differed in terms of species.R. crispuswas 10, R. obtusifoliuswas 8, R. patientiawas 14 cornered. The number and type of collenchyma layer in the stem of the species were also different.Outward bulge was detected in the mid vein region in leaf cross-sections of taxa.This bulge was less pronounced in R. crispusand the most prominentin R. obtusifolius. At least the number of stomata was observed on the R. obtusfoliusleaf. Leaf epidermis cell walls were wavy in R. patientia.A large number of druse crystals had been identified in the leaves of all species.
___
- [1] Geven, F., Bingöl, Ü., & Güney, K., (2008). The revision of Polygonaceae family at herbarium ANK and to prepare of the database. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 67- 85.
- [2] Davis, P.H., (1967). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press, 2, p. 265-293.
- [3] Davis, P.H., (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean lands. Edinburgh University Press, 10, p. 86-292.
- [4] Sharma, M., Sharma, P., & Rangaswomi, S., (1977) Crystalline chemical components of the roots of Rumex nepalensis. Indian J. Chem., 16B, 289-291.
- [5] Kuruüzüm, A., & Demirezer, L.Ö., (1997). Usage and Biological Activities of Rumex Species. Fabad J. Pharm. Sci., 22, 21-26.
- [6] El-Bakry, A. A., Mostafa, H.A.M., & Eman, A., (2013). Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of seedlings of Rumex vesicarius L. (Polygonaceae). Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 7(29), 2158-2164.
- [7] Ginovyan, M., Petrosyan, M., & Trchounian, A., (2017). Antimicrobialactivity of some plant materials used in Armenian traditional medicine. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 17(1),50.
- [8] Pareek, A., & Kumar, A., (2014). Rumex crispus L.–A plant of traditional value. Drug Discovery, 9(20), 20-23.
- [9] Aghajanyan, A., Nikoyan, A., & Trchounian, A., (2018). Biochemical activity and hypoglycemic effects of Rumex obtusifolius L. seeds used in armenian traditional medicine. Hindawi BioMed Research International, Volume 2018, 1-10.
- [10] Demir, E., Sürmen, B., Özer, H., & Kutbay, H.G., (2017). Salıpazarı ve Çevresinde (Samsun/Türkiye) Doğal Olarak Yetişen Bitkilerin Etnobotanik Özellikleri. Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 7(2), 68-78.
- [11] Ulcay, S., & Şenel, G., (2020). An Ethnobotanical Study on Some Medicinal and Edible Plants Distributed Around Tokat in Turkey. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Science, 8- 1, 62-69.
- [12] Metcalfe, C.R., & Chalk, L., (1950). Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, p: 724.Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- [13] Metcalfe, C.R., & Chalk, L., 1979. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, 2nd ed., vol. I. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 276.
- [14] Stace, C.A., (1984) The Taxonomic Importance of the Leaf Surface. In: Heywood, V.H. and Moore, D.M., Eds., Current Concepts in Plant Taxonomy, Academy Press, London, 67-94.
- [15] Lu, H.F., Jiang, B., Shen, Z.G., Shen, J.B., Peng, Q.F., & Cheng, C.G., (2008). Comparative leaf anatomy, FTIR discrimination and biogeographical analysis of Camellia section Tuberculata (Theaceae) with a discussion of its taxonomic treatments. Plant Syst. Evol., 274: 223–235.
- [16] Carlquist, S., (2003). Wood anatomy of Polygonaceae: analysis of a family with exceptional wood diversity. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 141, 25–51.
- [17] De Micco, V. and Aronne, G. (2010). Root structure of Rumex scutatus growing on slopes. IAWA Journal, Vol. 31(1), 13–28.
- [18] Ghazalah, Y., Khan, M.A., Shaheen, N., & Hayat, M.Q., (2010). Micromorphological investigation of foliar anatomy of Fagopyrum Mill., and Rumex L. of Polygonaceae. Pak. J. Bot., 42(1), 47-57
- [19] Sahney, M., & Vibhasa, (2012). Stem Anatomy of Medicinally Important Rumex hastatus D. Don (Polygonaceae). Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 8(2), 154-157.
- [20] Soleimani, M., Jafari, A., Shahrokhabady, N.K., & Moghadam, A.D., (2014). Comparative Anatomical and Palynological Studies on Rumex L. species (Polygonaceae) in NE Iran. Greener Journal of Biological Sciences, 4(4), 111-115.
- [21] Goremykina, E.V., & Dinekina, E.A., (2016). Traits of stem anatomy of some herbaceous members of the family Polygonaceae Juss. Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin, 71(3), 121–125.
- [22] Davis, P.H., (1966). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Edinburgh University Press. vol II, p. 15-88-246.
- [23] Vardar, Y., (1998). Botanikte Preparasyon Teknikleri. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Baskı İşleri, İzmir, p. 112.
- [24] Meidner, H. & Mansfield, T.A., (1968). Physiology of stomata. McGraw- Hill, London, p. 176
- [25] Laan,P., Berrevoets, M.J., Lythe, S., Armstrongt, T.W., & Blom C.W.P.M., (1989). Root morphology and aerenchyma formation as indicators of the flood-tolerance of Rumex species. Journal of Ecology, 77, 693-703.
- [26] Zimmermann, M.H., & Tomlinson, P.B., (1972). The Vascular System Of Monocotyledonous Stems. Botanical Gazette, 133(2), 141-155.
- [27] Maheshwari, P., & Singh, B., (1941). On the internal bundles in the stem of Rumex patientia L. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, Section B, 15(3), 153-157.
- [28] Keshavarzi, M., Ebrahimi, F., & Mosaferi, S., (2018). Comparative anatomical and micromorphological study of some Rumex species (Polygonaceae). Acta Biologica Szegediensis, 62(1), 45-52.
- [29] Tawab, S.A., Wafaa, S.M., Reem, M.S., & Morsi, F.A., (2017). Morphological and anatomical studies on some dicot plant species collected from East Egypt desert. Journal of Scientific Research in Science, 34(1), 602-610.
- [30] Khan ,M.A., & Hayat M.Q., (2010) Micromorphological investigation of foliar anatomy of Fagopyrum Mill., and Rumex L. of Polygonaceae. Pak. J. Bot., 42(1), 47-57.
- Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
- Yayıncı: Marmara Üniversitesi