Günümüz Türkiyesinde İranlı Göçmenlerin Sosyoekonomik Entegrasyonu

Kuzey Amerika ve Batı Avrupa hedefli göçlerde yaşanan zorluklar ile komşu ülkedeki fırsatlar, son yıllarda birçok İranlı için Türkiye’yi yeni “hedef ülke” konumuna getirmiştir. Bu araştırma, Türkiye’de yaşayan İranlı göçmenler ile uluslararası koruma başvurusunda bulunmuş İranlıların göç deneyimlerini, Türkiye’ye entegrasyonlarında karşılaştıkları zorlukları, sosyal, ekonomik ve kültürel faktörleri de dikkate alarak incelemektedir. Araştırmanın temel amacı; İranlıların Türkiye’yi hedef ülke olarak seçme nedenleri ile ülkeye yerleşme ve entegrasyon süreçlerini analiz etmektir. Bu amacı gerçekleştirmek için çalışmada, Türkiye’nin farklı illerinde yaşayan 41 İranlı ile yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Nitel bulgular, coğrafi ve kültürel yakınlığı nedeniyle Türkiye’nin İranlılar için en iyi varış ülkelerinden biri olduğunu ve bu yakınlıkların İranlıların Türkiye’ye daha kolay entegre olabilmelerine imkân sağladığını göstermektedir. Ancak göçmenlerin yeni topluma entegre olma konusunda ciddi zorluklarla karşılaştıkları da görülmektedir. Bu zorluklar, işgücü piyasasına dâhil olmanın önündeki engellerden sağlık hizmetlerine erişime kadar uzanmaktadır. Ayrıca İranlı göçmenlerin günlük yaşamları ve gelecek planları, Türkiye’nin göçmenlere yönelik sürekli değişen uygulamalarından da etkilenmektedir. Bu araştırma, göç yönetimindeki karar vericilere İranlı göçmenlerin sosyoekonomik entegrasyonundaki engelleri azaltmak için stratejiler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Göç, uyum, parçalı asimilasyon, Türkiye, İranlı göçmenler.

Socio-economic integration of Iranian immigrants in contemporary Turkey

Recent difficulties in migrating to North America and Europe and new opportunities in the neighboring country made Turkey a new destination country for many Iranians. This study examines the migration experience of Iranian immigrants and those Iranians seeking international protection refugees living in Turkey by exploring their social, economic, and cultural integration along with the barriers they face in integrating into Turkey. The main purpose of the research is to analyze the reasons for Iranians to choose Turkey as a target country and their settlement and integration processes. This study adopted a qualitative approach by conducting semi-structured interviews with 41 Iranians living in various cities of Turkey. The qualitative findings reveal that Turkey’s geographical and cultural proximity provides significant facilitating factors for the integration of Iranians in their new host society. The immigrants, however, face serious challenges in integrating into the Turkish society. These challenges range from obstacles in involving in the labor market to access to health services. Furthermore, daily lives of Iranian immigrants are also affected by Turkey’s changing migration policies which refrains them from making clear plans for their future lives. This study also provides strategies to policy-makers in immigration services to reduce the barriers in the social integration of Iranian immigrants.

Keywords:

Migration, integration, segmented assimilation, Turkey, Iranian migrants.,

PDF

___

Adıgüzel, Y. (2016). Göç sosyolojisi (1. Cilt). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
Akçapar, S. K. (2010). Re‐thinking migrants networks and social capital: A case study of Iranians in Turkey. International migration, 48(2), 161-196.
Akçapar, S. K. (2006). Conversion as a migration strategy in a transit country: Iranian Shiites becoming Christians in Turkey. International Migration Review, 40(4), 817-853.
Allen, S. (2008). Finding home: Challenges faced by geographically mobile families. Family Relations, 57(1), 84-99.
Andrews, A., & Shahrokni, N. (2014). Patriarchal accommodations: women’s mobility and policies of gender difference from urban Iran to migrant Mexico. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(2), 148-175.
Aysan, M. F. (2020). Access to social protection by immigrants, emigrants and resident nationals in Turkey. In J. M. Lafleur, & D. Vintila (Eds.). Migration and social protection in Europe and beyond: A focus on non-EU sending states (Volume 3, pp. 389-400). Springer.
Aysan, M. F., & Aysan, U. (2021). Institutions and individuals: Social policies in contemporary Turkey. In A. A. Tajmazinani (Ed.). Social policy in the Islamic world (pp. 137-157). Palgrave Macmillan.
Azadi, P., Mirramezani, M., & Mesgaran, M. B. (2020). Migration and brain drain from Iran. Working Paper 9 Stanford Iran 2040 Project. Stanford University.
Bauer, T., Epstein, G. S., & Gang, I. N. (2005). Enclaves, language, and the location choice of migrants. Journal of Population Economics, 18(4), 649-662.
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5-34.
Berry, J. W. (1994). Acculturation and psychological adaptation: An overview. In A. M. Bouvy, F. J. R. van de Vijver, P. Boski, & P. G. Schmitz (Eds.). Journeys into cross-cultural psychology (pp. 129-141). Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
BMMYK-UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2020). Resettlement data finder. https://rsq.unhcr.org/en/#90Vd adresinden erişilmiştir.
Browne, C. V., & Braun, K. L. (2008). Globalization, women's migration, and the long-term-care workforce. The Gerontologist, 48(1), 16-24.
Bushin, N. (2009). Researching family migration decision‐making: A children‐in‐families approach. Population, Space and Place, 15(5), 429-443.
Canefe, N. (2016). Management of irregular migration: Syrians in Turkey as paradigm shifters for forced migration studies. New Perspectives on Turkey, 54, 9-32.
Carter, F. W., French, R. A., & Salt, J. (1993). International migration between East and West in Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16(3), 467-491.
Castles, S., Korac, M., Vasta, E., & Vertovec, S. (2002). Integration: Mapping the field. Home Office Online Report, 29(3), 115-118.
Central Intelligence Agency-CIA. (2020, October). CIA World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ adresinden erişilmiştir.
Chiswick, B. R., & Miller, P. W. (2005). Linguistic distance: a quantitative measure of the distance between English and other languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 26(1), 1-11.
Cohen‐Goldner, S., & Eckstein, Z. (2008). Labor mobility of immigrants: Training, experience, language, and opportunities. International Economic Review, 49(3), 837-872.
Danış, D. (2006). Integration in Limbo: Iraqi, Afghan, Maghrebi and Iranian migrants in İstanbul. MireKoc Research Projects.
Derose, K. P., Escarce, J., & Lurie, N. (2007). Immigrants and health care: Sources of vulnerability. Health affairs, 26(5), 1258-1268.
Fyvie, A., Ager, A., Curley, G., & Korac, M. (2003). Integration Mapping the Field Volume II: distilling policy lessons from the “mapping the field” exercise. Home Office Online Report, 29(3).
Göç İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü-GİGM. (2021, 2022). Directorate general of migration management. DGMM istatistikler. https://www.goc.gov.tr. adresinden erişilmiştir.
Gurak, D. T., & Caces, F. (1992). Migration networks and the shaping of migration systems. In M. Kritz, L. L. Lim, & H. Zlotnik (Eds.). International migration systems: A global approach (pp. 150-176). Clarendon Press.
Heilbrunn, S., Kushnirovich, N., & Zeltzer-Zubida, A. (2010). Barriers to immigrants integration into the labor market: Modes and coping. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(3), 244-252.
İçduygu, A., & Yukseker, D. (2012). Rethinking transit migration in Turkey: reality and re‐presentation in the creation of a migratory phenomenon. Population, Space and Place, 18(4), 441-456.
İçduygu, A. (2009). International migration and human development in Turkey. Human Development Research Paper (HDRP) Series, 52.
İçduygu, A. (2005). Transit migration in Turkey: Trends, patterns and issues.
İçduygu, A. (2003). Irregular migration in Turkey. International Organization for Migration.
Isphording, I. E., & Otten, S. (2011). Linguistic distance and the language fluency of immigrants. Ruhr Economic Paper, 274.
Kalaylıoğlu, Y. A. (2015). Uluslararası göç bağlamında Bourdieu’nun kavramları: Ankara’da yaşayan İranlılar örneği. İdealkent, 5(14), 182-205.
Kirişçi, K. (2007). Turkey: A country of transition from emigration to immigration. Mediterranean politics, 12(1), 91-97.
Kirişçi, K. (1995). Post second World War immigration from Balkan countries to Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 12, 61-77.
Kogan, I. (2007). Working through barriers. Springer.
Labrianidis, L., & Sykas, T. (2009). Geographical proximity and immigrant labour in agriculture: Albanian immigrants in the Greek countryside. Sociologia Ruralis, 49(4), 394-414.
Lotfi, S. & Porsuk, S. (2021). Türkiye'ye göç etmiş İranlı kadınların sosyoekonomik durumlarının değerlendirilmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(78), 1047-1059.
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431-466.
McAuliffe, M., Khadria, B., Bauloz, C., Nguyen, M., Qu, S., Kitimbo, A. & Acosta, D. (2020). World migration report 2020. International Organisation for Migration.
Mobasher, M. M. (2018). The Iranian diaspora: Challenges, negotiations, and transformations. University of Texas Press.
Morokvasic, M. (1984). Women in migration. The International Migration Review, 18, 882-1382.
Norredam, M. (2011). Migrants’ access to healthcare. Dan Med Bull, 58(10), B4339.
O’Reilly, K., & Benson, M. (2009). Lifestyle migration: escaping to the good life? Routledge.
Osanloo, A. (2009). The politics of women's rights in Iran. Princeton University Press.
Portes, A. (1997). Immigration theory for a new century: Some problems and opportunities. International Migration Review, 31(4), 799-825.
Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530(1), 74-96.
Ray, B. (2002). Immigrant integration: Building to opportunity. Migration Information Source.
Robinson, V. (1998, November). Defining and measuring successful refugee integration. In Proceedings of ECRE International conference on Integration of Refugees in Europe (pp. 3-12). ECRE.
Rowlands, D. (2004). The effects of poverty, environmental degradation, and gender conditions on south to north migration. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D'études du Développement, 25(4), 555-572.
Ryan, L., Sales, R., Tilki, M., & Siara, B. (2009). Family strategies and transnational migration: recent Polish migrants in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(1), 61-77.
Ryan, L. (2011). Migrants social networks and weak ties: accessing resources and constructing relationships post-migration. The Sociological Review, 59(4), 707-724.
Schibel, Y., Fazel, M., Robb, R., & Garner, P. (2002). Refugee integration: Can research synthesis inform policy. Feasibility Study Report.
Sert, D. Ş., & Danış, D. (2021). Framing Syrians in Turkey: State control and no crisis discourse. International Migration, 59(1), 197-214.
Thadani, V. N., & Todaro, M. P. (2019). Female migration: A conceptual framework. In Women in the Cities of Asia (pp. 36-59). Routledge.
Thränhardt, D. (1996). European migration from East to West: Present patterns and future directions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 22(2), 227-242.
Turkish Statistical Institute. (2020, September). Housing sales statistics. https://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?_id=1056 adresinden erişilmiştir.
Van Meeteren, M., & Pereira, S. (2016). New roles for social networks in migration? Assistance in Brazilian migration to Portugal and the Netherlands. In Beyond networks (pp. 47-68). Palgrave Macmillan.
Zetter, R., Griffiths, D., Sigona, N., & Hauser, M. (2002). Survey on policy and practice related to refugee integration. Oxford, European Refugee Fund Community Actions 2001/2002; Conducted By School Of Planning, Oxford Brookes University.
Zijlstra, J. (2014). Stuck on the Way to Europe? Iranian Transit Migration to Turkey. Insight Turkey, 16(4), 183-199.
Zlotnik, H. (1995). The South-to-North migration of women. International Migration Review, 29(1), 229-254.