Democratic Left: The Leading Discourse of the 1970s in Turkey
As the leading actor of the Democratic Left movement, Bülent Ecevit emerged in the Republican People’s Party (CHP). Firstly, he became the leader of the CHP and then came to power in the Republic of Turkey in a short time. However, his power struggles both within his party and in Turkey was formidable. The first protuberant in his way through accessing the power was a historical personality, that is İsmet İnönü. He was the leader of the CHP when Ecevit initiated the challenge. This paper aimed to analyse the elements of Ecevit’s ideological discourse in the 1970s within the confines of arguments concerning Mithat Paşaa, Kemalism, and Marxism. In the first part, the contribution of Mithat Paşa, a moderniser in the Ottoman Empire during Abdulhamid II’s reign, to Ecevit’s movement was evaluated. Then, the relationship between Kemalism and Ecevit’s Democratic Left was discussed. In the last part, the differences and similarities between Ecevit’s leftist outlook and Marxism were identified. In the conclusion part, there was a general assessment of Ecevit and his discourse.
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Bülent Ecevit, Democratic Left, CHP, İsmet İnönü, Kemalism
Democratic Left: The Leading Discourse of the 1970s in Turkey
As the leading actor of the Democratic Left movement, Bülent Ecevit emerged in the Republican People’s Party (CHP). Firstly, he became the leader of the CHP and then came to power in the Republic of Turkey in a short time. However, his power struggles both within his party and in Turkey was formidable. The first protuberant in his way through accessing the power was a historical personality, that is İsmet İnönü. He was the leader of the CHP when Ecevit initiated the challenge. This paper aimed to analyse the elements of Ecevit’s ideological discourse in the 1970s within the confines of arguments concerning Mithat Paşaa, Kemalism, and Marxism. In the first part, the contribution of Mithat Paşa, a moderniser in the Ottoman Empire during Abdulhamid II’s reign, to Ecevit’s movement was evaluated. Then, the relationship between Kemalism and Ecevit’s Democratic Left was discussed. In the last part, the differences and similarities between Ecevit’s leftist outlook and Marxism were identified. In the conclusion part, there was a general assessment of Ecevit and his discourse.
Keywords:
Bülent Ecevit, Democratic Left, CHP, İsmet İnönü, Kemalism,
___
- Aydemir, Ş. S. (1971). “Ekonomik Yapı, Ekonomik Politik Değişmeler”. In Türkiye’nin Yapısal Analizi, (pp. 27-64). Ankara.
- Berkes, N. (2005). Türkiye’de Çağdaşlaşma, Istanbul: YKY.
- Boratav, K. (1983). Türkiye’de Popülizm: 1962-1978 Üzerine Bazı Notlar, Yapıt 1
- Cardoso F. H. (1982) Dependency and Development in Latin America. In: Alavi H., Shanin T. (eds) Introduction to the Sociology of “Developing Societies”. Palgrave, London.
- CHP. (1969). CHP’nin Düzen Değişikliği Programı, Ankara.
- CHP. (1973). Ak Günlere, Ankara: Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi.
- CHP. (1974). Başbakan Ecevit’le Sohbet, Ankara: CHP Tanıtma Komitesi Yayınları.
- CHP. (1976). Program, Ankara: Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi.
- Coşkun, A. (1978). Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi ve Demokratik Sol, Istanbul: Tekin Yayınları.
- Ecevit, B. (1968). Ortanın Solu, Ankara: Tekin Yayınevi.
- Ecevit, B. (1972). Perdeyi Kaldırıyorum. Ankara: Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi.
- Ecevit, B. (1973). Atatürk ve Devrimcilik, Istanbul: Tekin Yayınları.
- Ecevit, B. (1974). “Başbakan Bülent Ecevit’in Demokratik Sol Düşünce Forumunda Yaptığı Konuşma”. In Demokratik Sol Düşünce Forumu, (pp. 1-21). Ankara: CHP Gençlik Kolları Yayınları.
- Ecevit, B. (1975a). Demokratik Solda Temel Kavramlar. Ankara.
- Ecevit, B. (1975b). Demokratik Sol, Ankara: Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi.
- Ecevit, B. (1992). Neden ve Nasıl Demokratik Sol, Ankara: DSP Yayınları.
- Ecevit, B. (1993). Mithat Paşa ve Türk Ekonomisinin Tarihsel Süreci, Ankara: DSP Yayınları.
- Ecevit, B. (2005). “Türkiye’de Demokrasi”. Çankaya Üniversitesi Gündem, No. 20, (15-23)
- Erdoğan, N. (1998). “Demokratik Soldan Devrimci Yola: 1970’lerde Sol Popülizm Üzerine Notlar”, Toplum ve Bilim, No. 78, (pp. 22-37).
- Gülalp, H. (1998), “The Eurocentrism of Dependency Theory and Question of Authenticity: a View from Turkey” in Third World Quarterly, Vol 19, No 5.
- Karpat, K. (1991). “The Republican People’s Party: 1923-1945”. In M. Heper and J. Landau (eds.), Political Parties and Democracy in Turkey, (pp. 42-64). London: I. B Tauris.
- Koloğlu, O. (2001). Kim Bu Ecevit?, İstanbul: Boyut Kitapları.
- Konuralp, E. (2009). “Ecevit’s Conception of Nationalism: A Unique Position or a Syncretic Vision?” Master of Science Thesis, Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
- Konuralp, E. (2013). Ecevit ve Milliyetçilik. İstanbul: Togan.
- Laclau, E. (1977). Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: New Left Books.
- Tachau, F. (1991). “The Republican People’s Party, 1945-1980”. In In M. Heper and J. Landau (eds.), Political Parties and Democracy in Turkey, (pp. 99-107). London: I. B Tauris.
- ISSN: 2459-0584
- Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
- Başlangıç: 2016
- Yayıncı: Iğdır Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
Book Review: Democratization: A Critical Introduction
An Analysis On the Authoritarian Nature of the Turkmenbashy Regime
Democratic Left: The Leading Discourse of the 1970s in Turkey
Kuzey Kafkasya Analizi: Gölgelenen Savaşlar
Zorunlu Türk-Yunan Nüfus Mübadelesinin Etkileri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme