Thinking with Universal Design in Historical Environment

Thinking with Universal Design in Historical Environment

Historical environment is a unique and irreplaceable resource whichreflects the social, cultural and economic characteristics of the pastsocieties (Donely, 2011). It is an integral part of local, regional andnational cultural idendity. The environment especially consists ofhistorical environment and buildings are significant because of theiruses as place where people’s daily life activities. Moreover, meeting ofsocial and cultural assets which societies have been figuring from thepast with daily life turns into a resource for a sustainable future.However, it is generally impossible that those buildings which have beenconstructed in their own terms can satisfy the needs of today. In Turkeywhere the balance of protecting-using is on behalf of the first one, theprotection policies and protection regulations exceedingly limit theintervention to the natural environments. Wishing that historicalbuildings are actualized into daily life on one hand and clamping downon accessing, visiting and using those buildings on the other hand leadsto a serious discrepancy. However, the prominent examples whichoversee the balance of protecting-using show that historicalenvironments can be intervened through designing which will create oradd values without compromising on protection. All sorts ofinterventions to be conducted consider the potential needs of the userswithout giving any harms to the originality of the building. Thus, it isexpected that everyone can access the buildup area including thehistorical buildings, products and services and information equally andunder equitable conditions. For that reason, making the built-upenvironment accessible, visitable and usable through universal design isone of the fundamental rights for the people who expand their dailyliving environment through accessibility and universal design.In this study, accessibility, visitability and usability of BedestenHistorical Site in the city of Konya are discussed through the theme of“Thinking through Universal design” and suggestions of designing aregiven in various scales (urban scale, street scale and building scale).

___

  • Akın Güler, G., & Tutal, O., (2017). Accessibility and Attachments Of Historic Buildings. Paper Presented At The 6th International Symposium On Conservation And Consolidation Of Historical buildings, 2-4 November 2017, Trabzon.
  • Aydın, Ş., (1989). Geleneksel Konya çarşısının karakteristik özellikleri, Yüksek lisans tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • Çakmak, B. Y. (2013). Kültürel Mirasın Korunması Bağlamında Bir Yeniden Kullanım Örneği, Hamdi Gültepe Evi. Artium, 1(1), 64.
  • Donely, J., (2011). Access, Improving the Accessibility of Historic Buildings and Places, nDA National Disability Authority, http://www.buildingsofireland.ie/FindOutMore/Access%20-%2 0Improving%20the%20Accessibility%20of%20Historic %20Buildings%20and%20Places%20(2011).pdf (Accessed: 01.07.2018)
  • Ergenç, Ö., (1995). Osmanlı Klasik Dönem Kent Tarihçiliğine Katkı, XVI. Yüzyılda Ankara ve Konya, Ankara Enstitüsü Vakfı Yayınları:1., Ankara.
  • Evcil, A.N., (2014). Herkes İçin Tasarım Evrensel Tasarım, Boğaziçi Yayınları, İstanbul
  • Goldsmith, S., (2000), Universal Design A Manual of Practical Guidance for Architects, Architectural Press, Oxford Hacıhasanoğlu, I. (2003). Evrensel Tasarım. Tasarım+ Kuram Dergisi, 2(3), 93-101.
  • Heitzman, F. E. (2005). Universal Access in Historic Buildings, AIA, ASID,.http://academics.triton.edu/faculty/fheitzman/ihp abrochure.html (Accessed: 27.01.2018)
  • Herssens, J., (2013). Design(ing) for more – towards a global design approach and local methods https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268686968_ Designing_for_more__towards_a_global_design_approach_ and_local_methods (Accessed: 12.02.2018)
  • Kocadağıstan, M.A., (2015). Konya Bedesten Çarşısı Sağlıklaştırma Projesi, Mimaran, Sayı:12, pp.71-82
  • Mace, R. (1985). Universal Design: Barrier free environments for everyone. Designers West, 33(1), pp.147-152
  • Ostroff, E. (2001). Universal Design: An Evolving Paradigm, Chapter 1, Universal Design Handbook, Presier, W. F. E., Editor in Chief, ISBN: 0-07-162923-4, New York: Mc Graw Hill
  • Steinfeld, E., & Tauke, B. (2002). Universal design. In J. Christophersen (Ed.), Universal Design. 17 Ways of Thinking and Teaching, Norway
  • Topçu, K., (2011). Alışveriş Alanlarının Mekânsal Kalite Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz, Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • Tutal, O., (2012). I. Ulusal Cami Mimarisi Sempozyumu: "Gelenekten Geleceğe Cami Mimarisinde Çağdaş Tasarım ve Teknolojiler", Dini Yapıların Ulaşılabilirliği ve Ulaşılabilir Bir Cami Olarak Eskişehir Hacı Hasan Cami, İstanbul
  • Tutal, O., (2013). Improving the Universal Access in Historic Environment, IGU Urban Challenges In A Complex World, Life in a changing urban landscape, 21-26 July 13, South Africa
  • Uslu, A., & Shakouri, N. (2014). Kentsel peyzajda engelli/yaşlı birey için bağımsız hareket olanağı ve evrensel tasarım kavramı. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 7-14.
  • Uysal, M, (2004). Tarihi merkezlerde ticaret mekanlarının değişim/dönüşüm analiz yaklaşımı; Konya, Kayseri, Sivas örneği, basılmamış doktora tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • URL 1 http://www.tabuenca-leache.com/portfolio/mejora-de-laaccesibilidad-de-la-zona-noroeste-con-la-ciudadhistorica/
  • URL 2 https://vassallohistory.wordpress.com/the-barrakka-lift/
  • URL.3.http://mila.izkustvo.net/wpcontent/uploads/2009/06/athens-acropolis-elevator.jpg