Prediction of Metabolisable Energy Value and in vivo Digestibility of Some Organic Feedstuffs and Diet for Roosters

Digestibility coefficients of organic nutrients and metabolisable energy (ME) values of organic maize, wheat, barley and diet (complete feed mixture) were investigated in an experiment with individually followed at 64 weeks of age, 60 Hubbard roosters. In the experiment, average in vitro ME (MJ/kg) values were obtained 13.31-13.81 for maize; 12.42-12.99 for wheat; 10.73-11.71 for barley; 11.43-12.58 for soybean meal; 11.27 for diet. Digestibility coefficients (%) for dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), crude fiber (CF), nitrogen free extract (NFE), eutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were identified espectively 87.41, 88.44, 65.85, 85.42, 12.03, 94.55, 42.36 and 14.26 for maize; 84.81, 86.27, 71.67, 72.31, 25.71, 95.74, 60.79 and 35.71 for heat; 77.77, 79.19, 72.28, 58.21, 15.92, 87.80, 44.77 and 27.36 for barley; 70.06, 72.27, 73.38, 94.31, 24.40, 95.97, 67.99 and 45.47 for soybean meal; 82.83, 86.83, 71.77, 89.55, 24.76, 93.66, 58.36 and 28.76 for diet. The average in vivo ME (MJ/kg) values were determined 13.98 for maize; 13.62 for wheat; 11.84 for barley; 13.67 for soybean meal; 13.35 for diet.Anahtar kelimeler: Etlik piliç, öğün yemleme, performans, kan parametreleri, tonik immobilite

-

Digestibility coefficients of organic nutrients and metabolisable energy (ME) values of organic maize, wheat, barley and diet (complete feed mixture) were investigated in an experiment with individually followed at 64 weeks of age, 60 Hubbard roosters. In the experiment, average in vitro ME (MJ/kg) values were obtained 13.31-13.81 for maize; 12.42-12.99 for wheat; 10.73-11.71 for barley; 11.43-12.58 for soybean meal; 11.27 for diet. Digestibility coefficients (%) for dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), crude fiber (CF), nitrogen free extract (NFE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were identified respectively 87.41, 88.44, 65.85, 85.42, 12.03, 94.55, 42.36 and 14.26 for maize; 84.81, 86.27, 71.67, 72.31, 25.71, 95.74, 60.79 and 35.71 for wheat; 77.77, 79.19, 72.28, 58.21, 15.92, 87.80, 44.77 and 27.36 for barley; 70.06, 72.27, 73.38, 94.31, 24.40, 95.97, 67.99 and 45.47 for soybean meal; 82.83, 86.83, 71.77, 89.55, 24.76, 93.66, 58.36 and 28.76 for diet. The average in vivo ME (MJ/kg) values were determined 13.98 for maize; 13.62 for wheat; 11.84 for barley; 13.67 for soybean meal; 13.35 for diet

___

  • AOAC. 1980. Association of official analytical chemists, official methods of analysis. 13th edition. Arlington, VA, USA.
  • Blair, R. 2008. Nutrition and feeding of organic poultry. CAB International. ISBN: 9781845934064.
  • Boldaji F., Nakaue, H.S., Goeger, M.P., Arscott, G.H., Savage, T.F. 1985. The true metabolisable energy values of 15 Pacific Northwest poultry feeds. Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University, Corvallis, Special Report 751.
  • Buchanan, N. P., Hott, J. M., Kimbler, L. B., Moritz, J.S. 2007. Nutrient composition and digestibility of organic broiler diets and pasture forages. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 16: 13–21.
  • Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009. The Commission of The European Communities.
  • Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fibre analyses. Agriculture handbook No: 379, Washington D.C., pp: 829-835.
  • Härtel, H. 1977. Relations between N-corrected metabolisable energy and nutrient content of feeds for chickens. Arch. Geflügelk. 41: 152-182.
  • Jacob, J.P., Noll, S.L., Brannon, J.A. 2008. Comparison of metabolic energy content of organic cereal grains for chickens and turkeys. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 17: 540–544
  • Janssen, W. M. M. A. 1989. European table of energy values for poultry feedstuffs. 3rd ed. Beekbergen, Netherlands: Spelderholt Center for Poultry Research and Information Services.
  • Janssen, W. M. M. A., Terpstra, K., Beeking, F. F. E. and Bisalsky, A. J. N. 1979. Feeding values for poultry. 2nd ed. Beekbergen, Netherlands: Spelderholt Center for Poultry Research and Information Services.
  • Kearl, L.C., Harris, L.E., Lloyd, H., Farid, M.F.A., Wardeh, M.F. 1979. Arab and Middle East tables of feed composition. International Feedstuffs Ins., Utah Agric. Experiment Station Logan, Utah, Research
  • Report 30.
  • Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D. 1997. Commercial poultry nutrition. 2nd ed. University Books, Guelph, Canada, 355 pp.
  • Lessire, M. 1990. Effect of Feeding technique, adlibitum, dry or wet force feeding, on the metabolisable energy values of raw materials for
  • poultry. British Poultry Science 31: 785-793.
  • Marquardt, R.R. 1983. A simple spectrophotometric method for the direct determination of Uric acid in avian excreta. Poultry Science 62(10): 2106-2108.
  • McNab J.M. and Boorman K.N. 2002. Poultry feedstuffs supply, composition and nutritive value. CABI Publishing, CAB International
  • Naumann, C. and Bassler, R. 1993. Methodenbuch, Band III. Die Chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Nadeem, M.A., Gilani, A.H., Khan A.G. and Mahr-Un-Nisa. 2005. True metabolisable energy values of poultry feedstuffs in Pakistan. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 7(6): 990-994.
  • NRC. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. Ninth Revised Edition, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  • NRC. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. seventh revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  • SPSS for Windows 2006. Released 15.0 version, SPPS Inc. Chicago, IL.
  • TSI, 1991. Turkish Standard Institute, Animal Feeds-Metabolic Energy Determination (Chemical Method). TSI Nr: 9610, Ankara, Turkey.
Hayvansal Üretim-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-9597
  • Başlangıç: 1974
  • Yayıncı: EGE ZOOTEKNİ DERNEĞİ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

İşçi Arılarda (A. mellifera L.) Yumurta Denetleme Davranışı

Gonca ÖZBAKIR

Bazı Agro-Endüstriyel Yan Ürünlerin Doğal Antioksidan Kaynağı Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Burcu AKTAŞ, Pınar ÖZDEMİR, Hatice BASMACIOĞLU-MALAYOĞLU

Genel Doğrusal Karışık Modellerde Farklı Kovaryans Yapıları ve Tahmin Yöntemlerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması

Gazel Ser, Barış KAKİ, Abdullah Yeşilova, Ayhan YILMAZ

Etlik Piliçlerde Öğün Yemleme Uygulamalarının Performans, Parametreleri ve Korku Davranışı Üzerine Etkileri

Zümrüt Açıkgöz, Özge Altan, Figen Kırkpınar, Özer Bayraktar

Etlik piliçlerde öğün yemleme uygulamalarının performans, bazı kan parametreleri ve korku davranışı üzerine etkileri

Özge ALTAN, Ö. Hakan BAYRAKTAR, Figen KIRKPINAR, Zümrüt AÇIKGÖZ

Buzağı Beslemede Doğal Yem Katkı Maddelerinin Kullanımı

Hayrullah ÜNLÜ, Ramazan Erkek, Mürsel Özdoğan, Selim MERT

Prediction of Metabolisable Energy Value and in vivo Digestibility of Some Organic Feedstuffs and Diet for Roosters

Figen Kırkpınar, Muazzez POLAT, Hülya ÖZELÇAM, Hülya Hanoğlu, Yılmaz ŞAYAN

Gökçeada Kuzularının Büyüme ve Yaşama Gücü Özellikleri Üzerine Bazı Çevre Faktörlerinin Etkisi

Ayhan Ceyhan, Tamer Sezenler, Mehmet Yüksel, Mesut Yıldırır

Kesim Sırasında Farklı Frekanslarda Alternatif ve Doğru Akım Uygulamalarının Etlik Piliçlerin Bazı Et Kalite Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi

İhsan Bülent Helva, Mustafa Akşit