___

• Burrough-Boenisch, J . (2005). NS and NNS scientists' amendment s of Dutch scientific English and their impact on hedging. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (1), 25-39.
• Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 post graduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13 (2), 133-151 .
• Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
• Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland, Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 99-122). London: Longman.
• Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academi c writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (3), 239-256.
• Johns, A. (2001). Book review: hedging in scientific research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (2), 200-203.
• Jordan, R.R. (1997). English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Kamler, B.& Thomson , P. (2004). Driven to abstraction: doctoral supervision and writing pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 9 (2), 195-209.
• Koutsantoni, D. (2006). Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academi c literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5 (1), 19-36.
• Lewin, B.A. (2005). Hedging: an exploratory study of authors' and readers' identification of 'toning down ' in scientific texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (2), 163-178.
• McEnery, T.& Kifle, N. A. (2002). Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second language writers. In J . Flowerdew, Academic Discourse (pp. 182¬ 196). London: Longman.
• Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (2), 149-171 .
• Salager-Meyer, F. (2000). Procrustes' recipe: hedging and positivism. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 175-187.
• Silver, M. (2003). The stance of stance: a critical look at way s stance is expressed and modeled in academi c discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4), 359-374.
• Swales, J . M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Varttala, T. (1999). Remark s on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18 (2), 177-200.