HEMŞİRELERDE İŞLE İLGİLİ YAŞAM KALİTESİ ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONUNUN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ

Hemşireler yoğun iş yükü ve ağır çalışma koşulları gibi olumsuz işyeri koşulları nedeniyle işyerinde fiziksel ve psikolojik baskıya maruz kalmaktadırlar. Hemşirelerin iş yaşam kalitelerinin düşük olması, düşük performansa, tıbbi hatalara neden olmakta ve istenen sağlık sonuçlarına ulaşmayı engellemektedir. Arzulanan sağlık sonuçlarına ulaşabilmek için hemşirelerin iş yaşam kalitesinin ölçülmesi ve iyileştirilmesi gerekir. Bu çalışma, İşle İlgili Yaşam Kalitesi ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonunun psikometrik özelliklerini belirlemeyi amaçlamıştır. Araştırma Türkiye'nin İç Anadolu Bölgesi'nde bir eğitim ve araştırma hastanesindeki (N=226) hemşireler üzerinde yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin faktör yapısını belirlemek için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Çalışma yaşam kalitesini etkileyen sosyo-demografik değişkenleri belirlemek için regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin faktör yapısı doğrulanmıştır (χ2/sd = 2.370, RMSEA = 0.070). Ölçeğin yüksek düzeyde güvenirliğe sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.944). Sosyo-demografik değişkenlerden yaş, cinsiyet, medeni durum ve hastanede çalışma süresi ölçek üzerinde veya en az bir alt boyut üzerinde etkiye sahiptir. İşle İlgili Yaşam Kalitesi ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonu hemşirelerin çalışma yaşam kalitesini değerlendirmede geçerli ve güvenilir bir araçtır.

PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE WORK-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE SCALE ON NURSES

Nurses are exposed to physical and psychological pressure in the workplace due to adverse workplace conditions such as heavy workload and working conditions. The low quality of work life of nurses causes poor performance, medical errors and prevents reaching the desired health outcomes. In order to achieve the desired health outcomes, nurses' quality of work life should be measured and improved. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Work-Related Quality of Life scale. The study was conducted with nurses in a training and research hospital in Central Anatolia Region, Turkey (N = 226). Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to determine the scale’s factor structure. The regression analysis was performed to determine sociodemographic variables affected the quality of working life. The scale’s factor structure was confirmed (χ2/df = 2.370, RMSEA = 0.070). The scale had a high level of reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.944). Among socio-demographic variables, age, gender, marital status and years of working in the hospital have an effect on the scale or at least one subscale. The Turkish version of the Work-Related Quality of Life scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the nurses’ quality of working life.

___

  • Abbasi, M., Zakerian, A., Mehri, A., Poursadeghiyan, M., Dinarvand, N., Akbarzadeh, A., & Ebrahimi, M. H. (2017). Investigation into effects of work-related quality of life and some related factors on cognitive failures among nurses. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 23(3), 386–392.
  • Akar, H., & Üstüner, M. (2017). Turkish adaptation of work-related quality of life scale: Validity and reliability studies. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18(2), 159–176.
  • Akar, H. (2018). The relationships between quality of work life, school alienation, burnout, affective commitment and organizational citizenship: A study on teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 169–180.
  • Akter, N., Akkadechanunt, T., Chontawan, R., & Klunklin, A. (2018). Factors predicting quality of work life among nurses in tertiary‐level hospitals, Bangladesh. International Nursing Review, 65(2), 182–189.
  • Almalki, M. J., FitzGerald, G., & Clark, M. (2012). The relationship between quality of work life and turnover intention of primary health care nurses in Saudi Arabia. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), 1–11.
  • Alpar, R. (2012). Uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik-güvenirlik: spor, sağlık ve eğitim bilimlerinden örneklerle [Applied statistics and validity-reliability: With examples from sports, health and educational sciences] (3. Ed.). Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Alvanoudi, N. (2020). A study of the quality of work life for the staff of Greek academic libraries. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 9(3), 461–474.
  • Carrillo-García, C., Solano-Ruíz, M. D. C., Martínez-Roche, M. E., & Gómez-García, C. I. (2013). Job satisfaction among health care workers: The role of gender and age. Revista latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 21(6), 1314–1320.
  • Casida, J. M., Combs, P., Schroeder, S. E., & Johnson, C. (2019). Burnout and quality of work life among nurse practitioners in ventricular assist device programs in the United States. Progress in Transplantation, 29(1), 67–72.
  • Chen, W. S., Haniff, J., Siau, C. S., Seet, W., Loh, S. F., Abd, M. H., ...,& Baharum, N. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Malay work-related quality of life (WRQoL) scale in Malaysia. World, 1(1), 57–67.
  • Çokluk, O., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik spss ve lisrel uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics SPSS and LISREL applications for social sciences] (4. Ed.). Pegem Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Dai, H. D., Tang, F. I., Chen, I. J., & Yu, S. (2016). Taiwanese version of the work-related quality of life scale for nurses: Translation and validation. Journal of Nursing Research, 24(1), 58–67.
  • Demir, İ. (2020). SPSS ile istatistik rehberi. Efe Akademi Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Duyan, E. C., Aytaç, S., Akyildiz, N., & Van Laar, D. (2013). Measuring work related quality of life and affective well-being in Turkey. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 105–116.
  • Easton, S., & Van Laar, D. L. (2012). User manual of the WRQoL scale. University of Portsmouth: Portsmouth. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/en/publications/user-manual-for-the-work-related-quality-of-life-wrqol-scale-a-me.
  • Easton, S., & Van Laar, D. (2018). User manual for the work-related quality of life (WRQoL) scale: a measure of quality of working life. University of Portsmouth. https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/en/publications/user-manual-for-the-work-related-quality-of-life-wrqol-scale-a-me
  • European Commission (2011). Occupational health and safety risks in healthcare sector - Guide to prevention and good practice. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxemburg, 275. https://doi.org/10.2767/27263. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ilo.org/dyn/travail/docs/1965/osh.pdf
  • Ferreira, M., de Oliveira, S. B., Cribb, A. Y., & Ferreira, M. S. (2017). Improvement of processes in managing the organizational climate and work-related quality of life in a public-sector research company. Procedia Computer Science, 121, 475–482.
  • Garzaro, G., Clari, M., Donato, F., Dimonte, V., Mucci, N., Easton, S., ... & Pira, E. (2020). A contribution to the validation of the Italian version of the work-related quality of life scale. La Medicina del Lavoro, 111(1), 32–45.
  • Halcomb, E., Williams, A., Ashley, C., McInnes, S., Stephen, C., Calma, K., & James, S. (2020). The support needs of Australian primary health care nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(7), 1553–1560.
  • Hu, H., Zhou, H., Geng, J., & Zhang, L. (2020). Current status and influencing factors of the quality of work life of nurses in intensive care unit. Yangtze Medicine, 4(03), 183–192.
  • Kanten, S, & Sadullah, O. (2012). An empirical research on relationship quality of work life and work engagement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 360–366.
  • Liu, M., Lam, B., Fong, P., & Yuan, H. B. (2012). Nursing shortage: The facts and strategies in Macao society. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18(1), 1–9.
  • Mo, Y., Deng, L., Zhang, L., Lang, Q., Liao, C., Wang, N., ...,& Huang, H. (2020). Work stress among Chinese nurses to support Wuhan in fighting against COVID‐19 epidemic. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(5), 1002–1009.
  • Nayak, T., Sahoo, C. K., & Mohanty, P. K. (2018). Workplace empowerment, quality of work life and employee commitment: A study on Indian healthcare sector. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 12(2), 117–136.
  • OECD (2020, July 08). OECD data, nurses. OECD. https://data.oecd.org/healthres/nurses.htm#indicator-chart
  • Opollo, J. G., Gray, J., & Spies, L. A. (2014). Work‐related quality of life of Ugandan healthcare workers. International Nursing Review, 61(1), 116–123.
  • Shukla, K., Shahane, S., & D’Souza, W. (2017). Role of demographic and job-related variables in determining work-related quality of life of hospital employees. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 63(1), 4–10.
  • Suzuki, K., Ohida, T., Kaneita, Y., Yokoyama, E., Miyake, T., Harano, S., ...,& Uchiyama, M. (2004). Mental health status, shift work, and occupational accidents among hospital nurses in Japan. Journal of Occupational Health, 46(6), 448–454.
  • Van Laar, D., Edwards, J. A., & Easton, S. (2007). The work‐related quality of life scale for healthcare workers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 325–333.
  • Wang, Q. Q., Lv, W. J., Qian, R. L., & Zhang, Y. H. (2019). Job burnout and quality of working life among Chinese nurses: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(8), 1835–1844. Wang, L., Wang, X., Liu, S., & Wang, B. (2020). Analysis and strategy research on quality of nursing work life. Medicine, 99(6), 1–5.
  • Yıldız, A., Kaya, S., Teleş, M., & Korku, C. (2020). The effect of nurses’ empowerment perceptions on job safety behaviours: A research study in Turkey. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 26(3), 489–496.
  • Yoosefi Lebni, J. Y., Toghroli, R., Abbas, J., Kianipour, N., Nejhaddadgar, N., Salahshoor, M. R., ...,& Ziapour, A. (2021). Nurses’ work-related quality of life and its influencing demographic factors at a public hospital in Western Iran: A cross-sectional study. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 42(1), 37–45.
  • Zubair, M. H., Hussain, L. R., Williams, K. N., & Grannan, K. J. (2017). Work-related quality of life of US general surgery residents: is it really so bad? Journal of Surgical Education, 74(6), 138–146.
Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

GELENEKSEL VE TAMAMLAYICI TIBBA YÖNELİK GÖRÜŞLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: AİLE SAĞLIĞI MERKEZİ ÖRNEĞİ

Fatma YÜKSELİR ALASIRT, Pınar YALÇIN BALÇIK

SAĞLIK-HİZMET-HATASI ÖLÇEĞİ: SAĞLIK HİZMET HATALARININ BELİRLENMESİNE YÖNELİK BİR ÖLÇEK GELİŞTİRİLMESİ

Yusuf ÖCEL, Kahraman ÇATI, Songül YORGUN, M. Fatih BAYRAKTAR

DAHİLİYE KLİNİKLERİNDEKİ HEMŞİRELERİN YENİLİKÇİ ÖZELLİKLERİNİN VE KANIT TEMELLİ HEMŞİRELİĞE İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARININ BELİRLENMESİ

Safiye YANMIŞ, Şadiye ÖZCAN

SAĞLIK ÇALIŞANLARININ COVID-19 İLE İLGİLİ ALGILARININ KAYGI DÜZEYİNE ETKİSİ

Ahmet YILDIZ, Erhan EKİNGEN, Mehmet TOP

ÇOCUKLUK ÇAĞI OBEZİTESİNİN SAĞLIK HARCAMALARINA ETKİLERİ: TÜRKİYE'DEN KANITLAR

Elnaz KARAMELİKLİ, Hülya GÜL

SAKARYA AKYAZI İLÇESİNİN TERMAL TURİZM POTANSİYELİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Hüseyin ASLAN, Buse METE, İsmail ŞİMŞİR, Cemil ÖRGEV

ÇOCUKLUK ÇAĞI OBEZİTESİNİN SAĞLIK HARCAMALARINA ETKİLERİ: TÜRKİYE'DEN KANITLAR

Elnaz KARAMELİKLİ, Hülya GÜL

BİR SAĞLIK KURULUŞUNDA KALİTE FONKSİYON GÖÇERİMİNE DAYALI YENİ ÜRÜN GELİŞTİRME SÜRECİNİN UYGULANMASI

Aliye Kübra ÜNAL, Aynur TORAMAN

KRONİK HASTALIĞA SAHİP OLAN BİREYLERE BAKIM VEREN HASTA YAKINLARININ HASTALIK SÜRECİ YÖNETİMİNE İLİŞKİN DAVRANIŞLARININ İNCELENMESİ

Elif AKDOĞAN, Elif KAYA

ECZANE ÇALIŞANLARININ SALGIN SÜRECİ VE SOSYAL DAMGALANMA ALGISI

Perihan EREN BANA, Duygu GÜRCAN COŞKUNER