Comparison of the alternative parameter estimators of Pearson distributions by robustness criteria
Pearson's differential equation is used for fitting a distribution to a data set. The differential equation has some alternative moment-based estimators (depending on the transformation to data). The estimator used when no transformation is made on the data set has 4 elements, and the estimators that require any transformation have 3 elements. We describe all elements of the estimators by corresponding vectors. One of the factors affecting the preference of an estimator is robustness. We use covariance matrix, bias, relative efficiency and influence function as our robustness criteria. Our aim is to compare the performance of the estimators of the differential equation for some specific distributions (namely Type I, Type IV, Type VI and Type III). 10,000 samples with specific sizes were selected with replacement. Also, we evaluated the performance of the estimators over real-life data. Considering the results, there is no best estimator in all criteria. Depending on the criterion to be based, the estimator to be preferred varies.
___
- [1] A. Andreev , A. Kanto and P. Malo, Computational examples of a new method for
distribution selection in the Pearson system, J. Appl. Stat. 34 (4), 487-506, 2007.
- [2] K. Arora and V.P. Singh, A comparative evaluation of the estimators of the log Pearson
type (LP) 3 distribution, J. Hydrol. 105 (1-2), 19-37, 1989.
- [3] F. Ashkar and B. Bobée, The generalized method of moments as applied to problems
of flood frequency analysis: some practical results for the log-Pearson type 3 distribution,
J. Hydrol. 90 (3-4), 199-217, 1987.
- [4] K.O. Bowman and L.R. Shenton, Approximate percentage points for Pearson distributions,
Biometrika 66 (1), 147-151, 1979.
- [5] K.O. Bowman and L.R. Shenton, Notes on the distribution of $\sqrt b_1$ in sampling from pearson distributions, Biometrika 60 (1), 155-167, 1973.
- [6] Y. Büyükkör and A.K. Şehirlioğlu, A Robust Regression Method Based on Pearson Type
VI Distribution, in: Advances in Econometrics, Operational Research, Data Science and
Actuarial Studies, 117-142, Switzerland:Springer, 2022.
- [7] S. Chen and H. Nie, Lognormal sum approximation with a variant of type IV Pearson
distribution, IEEE Commun. Lett. 12 (9), 630-632, 2008.
- [8] A.C. Cohen, Estimation of parameters in truncated Pearson frequency distributions,
Ann. Math. Stat. 22 (2), 256-265, 1951.
- [9] H. Cramér, Mathematical Methods of Statistics, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1946.
- [10] K.A. Dunning and J.N. Hanson, Generalized Pearson distributions and nonlinear
programing, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 6 (2), 115-128, 1977.
- [11] W.P. Elderton and N.L. Johnson, System of Frequency Curves, USA: Cambridge
University Press, 1969.
- [12] J.F. England, J.D. Salas and R.D. Jarrett, Comparisons of two moments-based estimators
that utilize historical and paleoflood data for the log Pearson type III distribution,
Water Resour. Res. 39 (9), 1-16, 2003.
- [13] A.M. Fiori and M. Zenga, The meaning of kurtosis, the influence function and an
early intuition by L. Faleschini, Statistica 65 (2), 135-144, 2005.
- [14] F.R. Hampel, E.M. Ronchetti, P.J. Rousseeuw and W.A. Stahel, Robust Statistics,
The Approach Based on Influence Functions, New York: Wiley, 1986.
- [15] F.R. Hampel, The influence curve and its role in robust estimation, J. Amer. Statist.
Assoc. 69 (346), 383-393, 1974.
- [16] P.J. Huber and E.M. Ronchetti, Robust Statistics, New York: John Wiley and Sons,
2009.
- [17] T. Isogai, On using influence functions for testing multivariate normality, J. Amer.
Statist. Assoc. 41 (1), 169-186, 1989.
- [18] M.G. Kendall, A. Stuart, J.K. Ord, S.F. Arnold, A. O’Hagan and J. Forster, Kendall’s
Advanced Theory of Statistics (Vol.1), London: Griffin, 1987.
- [19] I.A. Koutrouvelis and G.C. Canavos, Estimation in the Pearson type 3 distribution,
Water Resour. Res. 35 (9), 2693-2704, 1999.
- [20] R.V. Krejcie and D.W. Morgan, Determining sample size for research activities, Educ.
Psychol. Meas. 30 (3), 607-610, 1970.
- [21] B. Lahcene, On Pearson families of distributions and its applications, Afr. J. Math.
Comput. Sci. Res. 6 (5), 108-117, 2013.
- [22] K.W. Liao and N.I.D.R. Biton, A heuristic optimization considering probabilistic constraints
via an equivalent single variable Pearson distribution system, Appl. Soft Comput.
2019 (78), 670-684, 2019.
- [23] N.C. Matalas and J.R. Wallis, Eureka! It fits a Pearson type: 3 distribution, Water
Resour. Res. 9 (2), 281-298, 1973.
- [24] Y. Nagahara, A method of simulating multivariate nonnormal distributions by the
Pearson distribution system and estimation, Comput Stat Data Anal 40 (2004), 1-29,
2004.
- [25] Y. Nagahara, Non-Gaussian filter and smoother based on the Pearson distribution
system, J. Time Ser. Anal. 24 (6), 721-738, 2003.
- [26] Y. Nagahara, The PDF and CF of Pearson type IV distributions and the ML estimation
of the parameters, Stat Probab Lett 43 (3), 251-264, 1999.
- [27] B. Naghavi, J. Cruise and K. Arora A comparative evaluation of three estimators of
log Pearson type 3 distribution, Transp. Res. Rec. 1279, 103-112, 1990.
- [28] N.U. Nair and P.G. Sankaran, Characterization of the Pearson family of distributions,
IEEE Trans Reliab 40 (1), 75-77, 1991.
- [29] O. Özdemir and H. Emeç, CDS Primleri, Hisse Senedi Piyasası ve Petrol Piyasası
Arasındaki Oynaklık Yayılımı in Ekonometride Ampirik Çalışmalar, 137-160, Ankara:
Nobel, 2020.
- [30] R.S. Parrish, On an integrated approach to member selection and parameter estimation
for Pearson distributions, Comput Stat Data Anal 1, 239-255, 1983.
- [31] H.O. Posten, The robustness of the one-sample t-test over the Pearson system, J.
Stat. Comput. Simul. 9 (2), 133-149, 1979.
- [32] M.H. Quenouille, Notes on bias in estimation, Biometrika 43 (3/4), 353-360, 1956.
- [33] R. Serfling,Asymptotic Relative Efficiency in Estimation, International Encyclopedia
Of Statistical Science, 68-72, 2011.
- [34] M. Shakil, B.M.G. Kibria and J.N. Singh, A new family of distributions based on the
generalized Pearson differential equation with some applications, Austrian J. Stat. 39 (3),
259278, 2010.
- [35] M. Shauly and Y. Parmet, Comparison of Pearson distribution system and response
modeling methodology (RMM) as models for process capability analysis of skewed data,
Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2011 (27), 681-687, 2011.
- [36] V.P. Singh and K. Singh, Parameter estimation for log-Pearson type III distribution
by POME, J Hydraul Eng 114 (1), 112-122, 1988.
- [37] H. Solomon and M.A. Stephens, Approximations to density functions using Pearson
curves, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 73 (361), 153-160, 1978.
- [38] S. Stavroyiannis, On the generalised Pearson distribution for application in financial
time series modelling, Glob. Bus. Econ. Rev 16 (1), 1-14, 2014.
- [39] J. Sun, A. Kabán and J.M. Garibaldi, Robust mixture clustering using Pearson type
VII distribution, Pattern Recognit. Lett. 31 (2010), 2447-2454, 2010.
- [40] A.K. Şehirlioğlu and S. Dündar, Pearson Dağılış Ailesi,İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi
Basımevi, 2014.
- [41] M. Ünlü, Comparison of The Parameter Estimators of The Main Types of Pearson
Distributions by Robustness Criteria, PhD Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, 2019.
- [42] R. Willink, A closed-form expression for the Pearson type IV distribution function,
Aust N Z J Stat 50 (2), 199-205, 2008.
- [43] Z. Winiewski, M-estimation with probabilistic models of geodetic observations, J.
Geod. 88 (10), 941-957, 2014.